Speculations

I see the electron cloud as being composed of individual constituents which are virtual (dissipate when separated) oblong and have equal strength magnetic poles which bind them together in linear curving waves. I see this electron cloud as having velocity around the nucleus and being more densely packed closer to the nucleus and less dense with vacuum spaces towards the outer shell limits. I see the electron forming as a vortex would form in water or a tornado in the atmosphere. The bulk of the electron would be the top of the vortex or tornado and that bulk would be responsible for the negative charge and mass of the electron while the positive end of electrons field wo…

I would like to discuss a string model that may contain two dimensions of time. I don't know if I am counting dimensions correctly or not and the model has parts I have not been able to identify, strange as that may sound.

The unobserved quantum side doesn't care about time or distance so the order goes something like this: quantum field excitation of a new particle is about to happen it gets assigned a path in the quantum field if the path contains a spacetime enactor (a detector), it swaps the particle to be physical the particle or wave is sent via the quantum field if it's a wave / spacetime if physical

Hi, I read this article, and I have a theory https://www.zmescience.com/science/physics/physicists-are-a-step-closer-to-a-theory-of-quantum-gravity/ Let me explain : in model, - quantum theory use "virtual particles". In my model : particle are not virtual, but what we call "void" is filled with two kinds of real particles : matter and antimatter (or maybe some other kind of symmetry).. think of it like electric charges in a metal.. you have two opposite charges but they globally cancel out each other. If the void is indeed filled with particles of matter and antimatter interacting, (but ! stable of course, because the high energy of the photons would …

You may think you have evidence of a particle acting as a wave at the same time ..but you don't. You are assuming they are both at the same time because you are not taking observation into account. You wouldn't catch a quantum wave being a wave before it went through a detector (that it was moving towards). The particle is likely pre-set to be physical or a wave before it starts moving. Observation gives one type of result ..a physical one. (unless you messing around with polarizers) . They key to killing duality is pointing out that the final panel of an experiment doesn't count as observation. When you say you can measure wave-like properties, it is derived from that…

First, are you claiming they are both at the same time or not? What started this assumption? In what world is an electron equivalent to a whole atom? So, I'll take this to mean we haven't tested two unobserved atom matter waves interacting? Oh, we have, but it does the typical thing of a fringe pattern. They don't ever bounce off each other like they were physical at the time. hmmm I'll bite, what does your electron experiment look like? Does it somehow display the electron and wave version at the same time while it propagates on its path? Why would orbitals have anything to do with what I'm asking for? I'm not interested in atoms exchanging electrons. Yo…

Not without a mathematical model. The LCDM doesn't do this but my mathematical model was recently recognized: https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg24332440-600-quantum-weirdness-isnt-real-weve-just-got-space-and-time-all-wrong/ There's also a plethora of observational data supporting it, CCC as black holes have evaporated in this universe as well as galaxies that lack a central black hole having no dark matter as well as Entanglement and The Eraser and FRBs as white holes corresponding to black holes as well as circumventing the 3 different measurements of the CC by explaining away redshift as simply newly merged extracosmic black holes added at the event hori…

Teleportation vs time travel both requires the manipulation of space time. Teleportation is like going through space time where time travel is like falling through space time(going in between space time). Is this analogy correct? Or is there other scientific resources relating to this?

We agree that the smaller the particles the faster it moves? We got photon traveling at the speed of light. And electrons that orbit the atom sometimes even above light speed, speculation. And we further theorized the constitution of electrons, photons, and neutrons making out of quarks. What do you think is the moving speed of these quarks? If quarks do move on the border line of light speed, what does it say about the smallest fundamental particles? Is it a form of energy?

I don't think the double slit should count as there is a good chance those two waves going through the slits are entangled. What do you know about unobserved quantum wave behavior?

My Triple DNA Bases model based on modified pyrene(C16H10) molecules has a issue with "Tautomerism" !!! (First Image) So, I had to include the Tautomerism into my design !!! (Second Image)

Let me introduce for your attention a very interesting mechanical system. It is called: "Varipend." Variable pendulum ( VariPend = VARIable + PENDulum) A pendulum of variable length and mass, implemented in an isolated system. - the case increases its mass - working moving mass decreases The mass of the entire system is unchanged! [math]M(t) = {m_{liquid}}(t) + {m_{case}}(t) = const[/math] The total momentum of the Varipend system: [math]{{\vec p}_{var}}(t) = {m_{liquid}}(t)\;{{\vec v}_1}(t) + {m_{case}}(t)\;{{\vec v}_2}(t)[/math] …

My theories that Strange keeps locking may be vindicated ..and stolen at the same time. https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg24332440-600-quantum-weirdness-isnt-real-weve-just-got-space-and-time-all-wrong/

Time doesn't pass in a black hole (past the event horizon) because unobserved quantum waves don't use time. If unobserved quantum waves don't use time, is it a safe bet they are using frequency instead? The quantum field is usually intermixed with spacetime, but apparently it doesn't always have to be.

I have a theory for discussion that time is created by the expansion of space. I propose that every point of space in the universe is expanding at the speed of light and time as we perceive it is the measurement of the potential to move into the space created. This creates a reality horizon. A physical barrier if you like which is light speed. When you travel in space you are closer to the horizon in the direction you are moving meaning that space in front is effectively expanding slower creating a time dilation for the object in motion. Travelling at the speed of light would mean that space would not be expanding in the direction of travel at all so there woul…

"Dark" implies something is unobservable. So that's what Dark Matter/Energy are. Dark Energy is the unobservable quantum field. Quantum objects don't use spacetime, but spacetime's gravity can bend the fabric of the quantum field. Dark Matter is matter that normally would convert over to spacetime naturally but doesn't. It's found in abundance as halos around galaxies. Which leads me to believe it's a substance that held together galaxies before spacetime was turned on.

Over the past several years I posted inquiries in this forum a few times as I developed my theory. A few folks were considerate and helpful, in particular Mordred. Most were rude and derisive, so I stopped participating here. My final theory was published today as peer reviewed in the Journal of Cosmology, Vol. 26, #21, at: http://journalofcosmology.com/JOC26/General%20Relativity%20and%20Effects%20in%20Time%20as%20Causation%20JofC.pdf. I would now be interested in non-derisive discussion.......

Just for a minute, think what the collapsing core of a black hole is doing to spacetime. It creates its own space and lots of it. There is vastly more space inside a black hole than it takes up in our universe. Looking from the outside, space is reversed, with more and more space as you approach the center. What this looks like from inside, is that the event horizion is in the center and the initial mass that collapsed is fleeing into outer space. There is a quantum leap at the event horizon. You either go slower than light on this side of the event horizon, or go slower than light on the other side of the event horizon. Time always elapses forward but space reverses. Rel…

You have a double slit with opposite linear polarizers at each slit. You get an observed clump. You then add a 45 degree polarizer and the fringes come back. It's not because the which way information is getting erased. It's because the particle starts a new life when passing through multiple filters. The state of a particle is predetermined based on the path it will fly through. But something interesting happens with you place multiple detectors. The particles state is reassessed while passing through a polarizer. If it sees another polarizer in its path it's going to cycle back to being a wave. Atoms normally shake around with thermal energy ..but not a…

You make a request by setting something that can analyze the particle during its life/path. You are saying you want the particle to be real/physical. Double slit interpretation: Randomly shot particles are shot through a double slit, if no one places a detector in the path of the particle, the unobserved particle will be in the form of two waves (one for each slit) . Depending on the which wave ends up with more energy (after the split) ..the final position of a channel representing a fringe will be the final resting place of the now collapsed particle. If the energy wasn't unbalanced, I would expect to see only a single channel of fringe be filled in. Now …

I had a random idea recently that popped in my head out of nowhere. The Idea itself is that mass such as Earth is occupying space. The space occupied therefore is now encompassing the mass in layers evenly around it. Space is not a substance and cannot exert pressure downward on mass. However space has been proven to constantly expand, Expansion is a form of movement which I could assume would also be a form of energy however undefined that energy may be. So if that energy of space expansion exists, Than the closer you are to the layers of space the stronger this energy becomes. I propose that the expansion force does exert constant flow towards all mass due to spa…

Its my belief that the Universe has always been here. I believe time and space are both infinite. Its also my belief that Gravity is created by matter and only effects matter, without any effect on time or space.

The scientific community’s understanding, at present, is that the spacetime continuum exists, but there is no clear understanding of how or what it’s made of. One of the major objectives of physics is to unify quantum mechanics with general relativity in a theory of everything. All expectations are that some very abstract mathematical equation will solve everything. However, it is possible to reason out the mechanism that causes QM and GR by considering some facts and their implications. Let’s start with an event and then consider the spacetime interval. The spacetime interval is a mathematical formulation that starts with an event that is seen by two observers…

If space is defined as the first three dimension would you then define time as the next three dimensions also running perpendicular to each other in the same way as space does? If so would it create a system that works as: dimension zero (a point in space) dimension one (a line in space), dimension two (a plane in space), dimension three (an area in space), dimension four (a point in time), dimension five (a line in time), dimension six (a plane in time), dimension seven (an area in time), or a system that works as: dimension zero (a point in space) dimension one (a line in space), dimension two (a plane in spa…

(E)=1(E·V1 /(U·I1) (E)E2 (Q2) where E=Eq(L) V1=Eq(V1-U-I) U1=Eq(U1-II) II=Eq(II-U2-1) (Eq(1)) = 2l/E (Eq(2)) = (1)(E0). = 2l/E U0=Eq(V0-E1-U1-I) I0=Eq(I0-II0-U2-1) (1)E = Eq(2) (2)E = Eq(4) (Equal): (1) E = Eq(3) In conclusion, For whatever reason this formula is so easy to apply to anything, that I would be curious to know, why it works with "nothing"?