Speculations

Ok, well a question for all those here that are well versed in physics, and believe they are absolutes. In July this year, we had the Pentagon it self admit to the existence of UAP's (UFO's). These UAP's have mass, as they show up on all forms of radar. They also have no visible means of propulsion. Along with that, they perform maneuvers that the current known laws of physics do not allow for. Perhaps those here well versed in the laws of physics can explain all this ?. Quote: He views the UAP/UFO phenomena as a scientifically interesting problem, driven in part by observations that seem to defy the laws of physics. https://www.space.com/unidentified-aerial-phenome…

Rather than defining positions on the diagram as events, define the diagram as representing actual reality in the following manner and then locate the event in the resulting dynamic model. The hyperplane going through the origin is the present of all space, three dimensional space depicted in two dimensions, . This hyperplane falls through the dynamic model at 1 sec per second along the z axis. All past events for the observer at the origin existed above the plane but are visible as photons coming in from all directions, shown on the diagram as the upper light cone. The lower light cone represents photons or signals going out, at light speed from the observer. T…

Hello all. Ok, well as this is my first post, i will start with my name, which is Brad. As always, I know there will be very strong opposition to any such device that seems to break the laws of physics. But no laws are being broken here, as there is an equal and opposite reaction to the action. The conservation of momentum also still applies--so on we go. I will confirm that this is not a theoretical experiment. This is an actual working device. Anyway, over the past 6 years, I have been developing a reactionless drive. The name !reactionless drive! would assume that there is no reaction to the action, and we all know that that would not produce any thrust …

''The Higgs field is a field of energy that is thought to exist in every region of the universe. The field is accompanied by a fundamental particle known as the Higgs boson, which is used by the field to continuously interact with other particles, such as the electron.'' ''In physics and electromagnetism, Gauss's law, also known as Gauss's flux theorem, (or sometimes simply called Gauss's theorem) is a law relating the distribution of electric charge to the resulting electric field. ''

This new concept of quantum gravity that DARPA is currently interested in is based upon a novel method of magnetic confinement I developed that curves charged particles about a singularity in a way that allows for charged particles to relatively accelerate and interact from geodesic deviation. The subtle Relative Accelerated Energy (RAE) generated from deviating charged particles interacting is able to be focused and exponentially increased for possible experimental observation. I initially developed this novel quantum theory of gravity a few years ago while I was writing the patent for a magnetic confinement device for fusion that generates a negative well potential s…

SO A FEW YEARS AGO NASA DISCOVERED THERE IS A HUMONGUOUS 10 MILLION-DEGREE HALO OF GAS ENVELOPING THE MILKY WAY: https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/chandra/multimedia/hot_gas_halo.html If you look at the illustration, it looks exactly like the hypothetical dark matter halo. Except this one is real. They even say that 'it might be a solution to the missing baryon problem'. Well done Nasa. You finally confirmed Frank Zwicky's gas theory.(that was his vision of 'dark matter', not the current view which is plain sci-fi) And you also disproved Einsteins relativity theory. So long 'gravitational lensing'. Its now clear that it is this supe…

Contemplation of the Universe, how it is structured or how it was formed, has to be among the very top of those things on the mind of humankind throughout the whole of history. What is this Earth we stand on? What exactly is the Sun that we see, that gives us light? How far does the Universe go, and what happens after that? Is the Earth Flat or Round? Millions, and possibly billions, of hours have been spent in quiet contemplation of these Questions of the Universe. But can we know if the Earth is flat? Can this relatively straightforward question be resolved? The answers might surprise you. Using definitions and theorems found at my own website, we can answer n…

Can you give us some examples where interactions between light and matter can't be explained as a wave. The photoelectric effect has been discussed and the discrete nature of photon termination can also be explained as a wave without recourse to the simplistic analogy of particle impact. I don't find either of these as convincing evidence for the particle nature of light or am I missing something?

lPl-2 is the vacuum energy from QFT in m-2 on the right I have 1(kg s-2) or 1(N/m) inverse of a surface tension. Is my problem insolvent or do you see a solution please?

I assume that all electromagnetic waves travel through time in any direction with different powers. They also target existing electromagnetic waves at a specific point in time. Thus, it is possible to register a certain sequence of waves after their release. To carry out the experiment, you need to put the transmitter and receiver in one place and cover the transmitter with a solid piece of metal. The metal will absorb all waves, but the receiver will register those waves that have passed through time.

If I might be so bold as to take a stab at one of the most controversial definitions in philosophy and science, I would define consciousness as a causal chain from perception, to instinct, to conceptualization. This causal chain is reflected in our evolution across time as a species, as well as our day-to-day actions. Single celled organisms perceive light, complex organisms develop feelings in accordance with higher level perceptions, and eventually conceptualization acts as a modifier on perception-based instinct. I.e., I see a tiger (by the time light bounces off the tiger into my eyes, I am seeing an image of the tiger a fraction of a second in the past). A fraction o…

I have recently been reading Michio Kaku's new book, The God Equation, and a couple of things stood out to me that raised significant questions. "But if we blindly accept Einstein's theory, then we get into trouble, since his equations predict that the gravitational force at the very center of a black hole or the beginning of time is infinite, which makes no sense." Why is it that this "makes no sense"? Why is it that this assertion is frequently purported to be unassailable without any accountability to basic logic? In a section entitled "Why is the Night Sky Black?" Kaku writes: "If we start with a universe that is infinite and uniform, then everywhe…

Among them, stupidity condenses 🤣🤣🤣 Black Holes May Gain Mass From the Expansion of the Universe Itself https://scitechdaily.com/black-holes-may-gain-mass-from-the-expansion-of-the-universe-itself/ "Over the past 6 years, gravitational wave observatories have been detecting black hole mergers, verifying a major prediction of Albert Einstein’s theory of gravity. But there is a problem — many of these black holes are unexpectedly large. Now, a team of researchers from the University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa, the University of Chicago, and the University of Michigan at Ann Arbor, have proposed a novel solution to this problem: black holes grow along with the expansio…

There is only one Truth: The Universe is infinite. Everything else is speculation relative to observation. What are the odds that a measurement made to the nearest inch will be exactly 1 inch when measured to the nearest quintillionth of a quadrillionth of an inch? Negligible, in terms of the scientific burden of proof. As this methodology can be applied endlessly to any system of measurement regardless of the context, I have conclusively and scientifically proven that every single thread in this forum belongs to the category "Speculation". #math

[math]\Large{ M_{\text{U Hubble at }t_H} = \sum_{1}^{t_H / t_p} \frac{ m_{Pl}}{2}} [/math] I have an idea but I need confirmation thanks in advance

I got shut down with the two nows idea because SwansonT thought I was going against mainstream science. I am absolutely not going against the results of the experiments. GPS works. What I am suggesting is that you can arrive at thre same equations without distorting space and time. Most clocks these days, like the heated Cesium ones work on the basis of a certain frequency of light being given off by a certain drop of an electron in the Cesium atom to a lower energy level. This particular frequency is always 9,192,631,770Hz. Now suppose you are traveling fast toward this light. It will be blue shifted. The space the waves exist in will appear to be shortened.…

Check out this video https://youtu.be/DZQTuHqyHQg Now you too have the opportunity to do real science. That is, it should be clarified in which areas these studies related to pendulum disturbances have been performed when disturbances have occurred and in which areas when they have not occurred. One of the mysteries of physics, then, is why the precise pendulums become confused during the eclipse of the Sun. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allais_effect It goes without saying that the conditions in the experiments have certainly not been similar on a small scale due to the very angle at which particles / densities from the center of the Earth have encoun…

The way the universe works in Savo terms. Recycling is the A and O of everything Everything basically consists of one and the same thing. What it all basically consists of is in itself a pushing force. There is no separate substance and four separate forces separately. The atomic model and worldview will be revolutionized in the near future. A direct observation of how galaxies are born from the middle / inside out proves the current theories to be incorrect. That’s to be discovered at the latest with the new space telescope James Webb. Ok, and now for that matter. The birth of a visible universe expanding in space. First, the …

The world is completely connected. Everything fits. The planets cycle the sun the sun revolves around the center of the galaxy, the galaxy spins in relation to the great attractor. Every molecule, every atom has a history and a present state and a likely future condition. No part of the whole can be removed from its current state and inserted in a different time, because the past has already happened in total and the future has not yet happened. The whole universe fits together seamlessly. No way to exist in another time without taking the whole universe with you. If you take the whole universe with you you are effectively where you began. No time travel is po…

What do you think? Fundamental Cosmology and Physics Beyond the Standard Model4.pdf

I believe that evolution is highly unscientific since the statistical possibility of any level of sophisticated integrated life developing randomly unguided through random geentic mutation and natural selection based on said traits expressed via said genetic mutation is (or seems to me) so highly unlikely as to be impossible rationally - even given full 5 billion years - i would galdly discuss this with someone who is able to rationally counter this by having regard inter alia to statistical probability -

Especially in superconductors/superfluids there are observed so called macroscopic quantum phenomena ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Macroscopic_quantum_phenomena ) - stable constructs like fluxon/Abrikosov vortex quantizing magnetic field due to topological constraints (phase change along loop has to be multiplicity of 2pi). There is observed e.g. interference ( https://journals.aps.org/prb/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevB.85.094503 ), tunneling ( https://journals.aps.org/prb/pdf/10.1103/PhysRevB.56.14677 ), Aharonov-Bohm ( https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0375960197003356 ) effects for these particle-like objects. It brings question if this similarity …

(This is an extract from a piece I wrote elsewhere. I only intended to write an improvised paragraph but more ideas kept coming to me. I didn’t research anything. Could someone tell if anything I said makes genetic sense or if it’s wrong!?) As I said before nonphysical doesn’t mean nonlogical. If something was spiritually created that doesn’t translate to “anything goes”. It doesn’t mean that it was created by a particular God at a specific time for this stated prophetic reason. Nonphysical doesn’t mean nonobjective and subjective either. Much like the existence of eternal hell for nonbelievers can still be defeated solely on logical grounds of disproportionality …

Hello it is again a function of Hubble time tH =1/H as here : https://www.scienceforums.net/topic/125960-why-this-egality-is-exact-please/ you will not have the referential immediately, so don't contest with dimensional analysis please. here his equation, you will adapt the dimensions: [math]\rho_{\text{Vacuum at }t_H}= \frac{1}{ \vartheta} \frac{ G \text{ }m_{Pl}^2}{ (t_H\text{ }c)^2} [/math] with : [math] \vartheta=2 [/math] if tH>tPl (1) and [math] \vartheta=1 [/math] if tH=tPl (2) can you please confirm that : (2) give the exact numerical value ? and that (1) is a good approximation of the me…

Hello everyone,i came here to get some help about the topic i will write about now. Sorry for my English in advance. The topic Has allready been Here for 10 years : Anyways in the end nobody did really get to a proper answer. The thing Is that since i was a boy,i discovered that i could induce some kind of a feeling in to my body literaly instantly,and i can hold it up for a few seconds max before i eventually and sometimes twitch and stop doing it. I can hold that feeling for longer if i dont induce it with maximum pressure or whatever(i cant explain it better,hope u understand) The feeling starts vibrating from my chest to every pa…