Speculations

Reactionless drive url deleted

So does the body age because *Insert biological reason- DNA deterioration, etc"... Or does the body age because of the 'space-time' of the physical universe?

http://www.scienceforums.net/topic/102124-why-do-elements-want-to-achieve-a-stable-state/ I was just reading above thread, wanted to ask a question. @swansont I understand that lead & iron are classed as stable elements, but will eventually decay to Hydrogen/Helium. but will take trillions of years? I believe Hydrogen is a stable element that would never decay? So when all the stars/planets burn out, would their cold cores eventually decay to hydrogen/helium over trillions upon trillions of years? If the above all do decay to Hydrogen/helium, would these now very dispersed hydrogen atoms, eventually have the gravity to create a singularity &amp…

If the man in the rocket suffer no more acceleration, then, it's the same as if he was the one resting and the other moving from him. Twins... that maintain both of them into the same space-time dimension. But in this case, when the movement stops, they should have the same age... to this we must notice that one his actually moving. Giving a direction... as universe is expanding at various speeds, the maximum being light speed, the one moving at light speed would actually slow down his time to 0 when light speed max is reached. Common mistake about light speed is to consider a max for it. Max if Inifinity. We can only observe a range of speed I would call mate…

I would like to hear ideas on anybody's take on bioelectric magnetism. The reason for this is my personal interest in ways of achieving artificial gravity without the use of constant acceleration, centrifugal force, or an almost impossibly dense object as the source of a gravity field. My true question is: is it possible to charge or ionize a human body on a cellular or smaller level that will allow it to attract to a medium electromagnetic field built into a deck or walkway to simulate gravity to an extent?

Energy is a dimension just as much as Time. In this dimension everything travels as energy in waveform. The entire EM Spectrum is a subset to this dimension (until it is measured). All quantum weirdness events takes place in this dimension (superposition). The double slit experiment finally makes sense. The particle is an energy wave until it is measured and becomes mass. Dimensions of Mass = xyz ​Dimension of Energy = quantum waves Dimension of Time = t This revelation will be closed down by the mods, but will soon become the most viewed threads in the history of the site.

This post is an extension of an earlier post meant to focus specifically on a photons "self energy" and how it moves through space. Specifically consider Landau & Lifshitz Vol. II. On page 108, the wave equation section talks about electromagnetic waves “in which the field depends only on one coordinate, say x (and on the time). Such waves are said to be plane”. Electromagnetic waves are ever changing “plane waves moving in the positive direction along the X axis”. In volume IV, page 5, Landau & Lifshitz continue, talking about Quantization of the Free Electromagnetic Field and on page 11, introducing photons: These formulae enable us to introduce the concep…

Hi, I present below an alternative version (not a questioning) to the theory of general relativity in order to integrate the accelerating expansion of the universe, the dark matter and to solve the problem of quantum time. To do this, quantifying space-time is essential. It’s not an easy concept to explain. To do so, I will describe my approach below and have written an article for those who will be interested. There is a strong similarity (which is not obvious) between the energy of an elementary particle and the energy of a fluid in motion (describes the Bernoulli’s principle): For a moving particle, the energy comes from two sources: having speed and ha…

I originally assumed gravity had something to do with the cutoff ..but now this seams like a good answer?

i suppose i could define it from the equation s=vt taking v as the velocity of an object under no external forces so next would be define whats space a space is defined as the distance between two objects but lets imagine there are just two objects alone in the whole universe distance is relative to ones size and how can i define distance if i dont define size for example if i slowly double the size of both objects APPARENT distance will be half than before i hope you see where im going how can i define the distance dimention if i dont define the size dimention? we are just assuming as theres no RELATIVE change in size theres no change in size at a…

Please, I hope you will be open-minded. If you must, please, in the very least read the following as a form of entertainment, but I am telling you the following is correct. I've been given a noticeable part of the New Physics. In another thread I've already provided a detailed radio wave sub-photon experiment that if replicated by notable physicists and engineers would cause shock waves through mainstream. Additionally I've built gravity devices that demonstrate the nature of gravity. Such gravity devices can detect motion through space without using accelerometers or known methods. In short, such devices cannot be explained with the standard model. There are two gravity …

Why are we so certain EM packets travel physically as waves when not being measured? What if there is an invisible 3d lattice throughout the universe that an EM packet has to traverse when not being observed? When a measurement is made, the lattice disappears or morphs out of the way. If this turned out to be true, it would suggest a bubble of space-time, engulfing the experiment, is what would be changing dependent on a detector being used. I would be curious of multiple double slit experiments being conducted next to each other to see if overlapping bubbles cause anything weird in the results.

It's the uv. The moon is near the horizon more red, less ultra violet/blue. This is because particles in our atmosphere absorbe (a bit of the) ligth. It's due to the path of the ligth. It also has to travel a longer distance in our atmosphere so it is being absorbed more. So is it with the sun. Easy to understand this. It affects a lot. I have not thinked so mutch about climate change because I do'nt care anymore. They spend billions of dollars but didn't understood/know this and more. I will keep the rest for myself. But one I can explaim. Good to know. Flora knows that autumn has come from the more red less uv/blue and the shorter dayligths. I takes/needs/ab…

I can explain but then all whould know/understand this. They explain it with balls on youtube on on childsplayground or with a plane but they theirselfes doesn't know/understand it. So any one who can explain this? If i explain it now, this topic would be moved I think. I will explain afterwards and I promisse even the average mind will understand the balls. Let's make it more interesting. In part one I will explain the balls and the coriolis effect. In part 2 on another topic I will explain the coriolis force and the gravity of earth. The upwards push low presure and towards pull (of the atmosphere) high presure.

Speed is how fast an object move in this physical reality. An object can move because there is space around it. We know base on the teaching of G.R. that no object can travel faster than the speed of light or even the speed of light itself because it is the top speed which our reality limits. We also know base on G.R. that an object that moves actually slows the time base on the perspective of observer and it changes it's shape as well as it increase it's mass. Now the intriguing part of it is that base on my speculation, if an object happens to travel faster than the speed of light it actually disappear on the view of an observer.Another profound speculation is that the…

Philosophical: time is an measurmentstool of us to set the past, live the moment and to organize the future. I know Einsteins aimings and what he did to prove his theory. He sended an atom clock with an plane and aimed that time on the surface will slow to opposite to the atom clock that is in an plane with HIGH SPEED. Back in 2014 I was a bit hyper. And had the thougth of all. The planets etc etc and was brainstorming about speed etc. I know more about time because I experienced a lot. When we brainstorm so mutch and fast time seems not to pass as usual. It seems slower. This is my theory and I know I'm rigth because I discovered mutch more with this: Tim…

I'm looking for comments on this: url removed per Rule 2.7 Thanks in advance! Please be brutal!

Can a homosexual, become heterosexual? I think it's possible. I assert homosexuality is not genetic, but mental; that homosexuality, is an abstraction of 'human competitive nature'. Boys will be boys... "There is a woman, long lost, in every homosexual man's imagination". 'Human competitive nature' spans from small-scale to large-scale; for example, simple games, and then, war... The abstraction of, this nature, can be abstruse. The long lost woman of the homosexual man's imagination, is hard to keep track of. A homosexual man may find comfort in pure-homosexuality (where there is no alternative); he may endure a life, and sexual life, withou…

Preface Is science today blinkering itself with complexity? black holes, bent space/time, string-theory, multiverses and the search for a God particle. Possibly, are the answers more simple? Below is the only proposition I am aware of that postulates what gravity is, and therefore what Black holes possibly are, and hypothesizes 'Time' before the Big Bang. The Eureka moment came from an inversion of one of science's assumptions. If this inversion is proven correct, then out comprehension of our universe is also upside down. The proposal may contradict an accepted unchallenged theory, but it is provocatively logical' A UNIFYING THEORY There cannot be nothing. The…

Clocks measure more time in expanding space. Maybe time is an expanding space.

As usual, the science gets into wrong conclusion about the following evidence. http://www.sciencealert.com/scientists-have-found-evidence-of-a-planet-eating-death-star Two new planets discovered… but there used to be three. . "When the team analysed the star's composition, they found four times more lithium than they expected for a star of its age – 6 billion years – along with evidence of a surplus of refractory elements: heat-resistant metals that are abundant in rocky planets. When the team analysed the star's composition, they found four times more lithium than they expected for a star of its age – 6 billion years – along with evidence of a surplus …

Before I state what I beleive it is :- I must acknowledge due respect to SRIMAN DUTTA and the responsive comments of SWANSONT . Having read a short new thread , in CLASSICAL PHYSICS this morning . While getting up this morning fired with the comments quoted above , a whole set of beliefs and contemplation over my entire life , gently yet powerfully , like a pile of books falling on top of me :- one of those 'EUREKA THOUGHTS , HAPPENED' That's it : ITS ALL RESONANCE FROM TOP TO BOTTOM . It's all resonance , throughout the entire universe . The only way it works and can work properly :- .- IS BY RESONANCE -. Mike Ps. .... One litt…

Where is the north pole? Everybody knows that (or so I thought). To be sure, I pulled out my compass & the blue needle_end pointed north, the silver end south. (That) Seemed pretty reliable, till I gathered compasses together, & then they started pointing at each others tails, instead, when they were close together. Hmm? Now I was totally lost. So I looked at a globe & in the Arctic area at the top it said North pole & magnetic north pole. I pointed my compass at the globe, but the compass needle didnt budge (staying in the direction it was before). (The globe must have been made of aluminum or plastic, or something else). …

The idea I had for this was to 'cheat' the geometry of how waves accelerate a particle by setting up an nano-apparatus which would distribute absorbed inertia such that the apparatus continuously accelerates into more waves of force. If possible, the major drawback would be that it wouldn't be able to travel in a straight line, and how it would fit into designs above the nanoscale is a head-scratcher. Another idea I had for long distance space travel (maybe not FTL, but relativistic speeds) would be to set up a solar-sail turbine with sort of a screw-like shape, which also has a strong electrical current running through it; as the solar sail reaches a relativistic th…

and why that is.