Jump to content

Char lie

Members
  • Posts

    8
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Profile Information

  • Favorite Area of Science
    Theoretical physics

Char lie's Achievements

Lepton

Lepton (1/13)

-12

Reputation

  1. Yes, you are right. So go on, please.. why i feel i have to make things clear is because you guys belong to kindergarden but still have no idea of where you are. "What is space made of?" Just the topic itself is showing the lack of vision.. It''s just wrong to start with this necause it leads dirrctly to a bad reference. You want to know why? Not sure you can. I didn't mean no offense but now i understand. And the long message you just sent is just propf that you know i am right but frustrated and so try to find a way to lake you become important... Don't worry, it's just human. Bye guys. Not surprised.. You won't solve anything here. But keep playing, it's cute.
  2. Hi Strange, First, you have no ability to define what i know or not. You say you like science, so respect it. 2nd, my words have a sense that you re not sensitive to. So, your problem only. 3rd, if you can't find the answer, it's just that you don't look at the right problem. As well, you speak a lot with no point. Who is showing nonsense. Finally, do you know what Asperger syndrome? I have skills you don't and i would be just please to share it with you all. But don't be mean and frustrated when some lne smarter than you want to help you.
  3. Hello everyone, I am very interested into this topic because, but my answer would require the study of different concepts before being understood clearly enough. Someone did say a very clever thing:" Why does it have to be made of anything?" The answer is in the question. Human can't represent themselves nothing when it's shown 24h over our head. Did anyone get why Einstein was interested into Brownian movement? Judt saying that "nothing is real". It means "Nothing" is "Real"!!!! We re so screwed with just words to explain a truth which existed before the word being created.... Fyi: e=mc2 works for both ways:" dématérialisation and materialisation When i think mankind has been waiting for Einstein to know about relativity... The universe is continuous and relativity manage all relative moving things. There are maths our consciousness can deal with perfectly, which are static maths.. if a car start form A at 12:00 and another car etc..? These are moving véhicules but the maths are static. Every answer will be ask regarding a certain time! Defining the notion of point on something contious as time??? There is no point in our universe!! The only point is our universe itself!!! So you can averagely know the answer to a question you thought that was easy before... So Space is made of nothing until provrn otherwise by observation, ok? Shroedinger's cat bloody hell!!! Sorry, i had to let this out. All the best guys! Thanks.
  4. I'll do my best. But, looks like there is a whole education to be redone with you, so, I won't waste my time. All you learned came from other people. Communication isn't perfect so by definition, you cannot get the full idea someone wants to transmit. So your knowledges you try to play with don't belong to you. And you think you understand??? Ok. Good bye.
  5. Why are you so offensive? This just theory. Let's take it easy, and enjoy new perspectives.. that's funny that such a thing makes you so angry... Might be because only the truth can hurt.. sorry about that. Didn't mean to. So I retract my theory and let you enjoy the dark. Regards. And yes you can block me. But think about it: "what would you be showing if you would?"
  6. First, before answering or emmitting any comments, it should be understood the topic. No offense, but, your answer just is the consequence of the frustration to not understand it because you're u can't. It's not because you cannot understand something that some one else cannot... So, when you say there is a max speed of light, you are already showing a lack of logic. First, it has to be specified "in an empty space". Second, as you still seems to wonder about what space is made of, how could you possibly take it as a reference for any debate. The max speed you are talking about is just the max measurable speed. The soeed in the material domain. Kind of like aerodynamics with compressible and uncompressible. You saying these make me think a lot of the people who told once to Galilée that he was wrong, and as well people thinking at the time that max speed would be 100km/h... or even max speed is the speed of sound... Howcome we are still stuck with this obvious things? So, demonstrate me the max soeed of light any domain and if you are right, i ll be happy too, because you will have tought me something new... But i doubt it. Humbly and sincerely honest. No offense. I don't speculate and that's my curse. Regards.
  7. If the man in the rocket suffer no more acceleration, then, it's the same as if he was the one resting and the other moving from him. Twins... that maintain both of them into the same space-time dimension. But in this case, when the movement stops, they should have the same age... to this we must notice that one his actually moving. Giving a direction... as universe is expanding at various speeds, the maximum being light speed, the one moving at light speed would actually slow down his time to 0 when light speed max is reached. Common mistake about light speed is to consider a max for it. Max if Inifinity. We can only observe a range of speed I would call material light speed. Universal time variation= 0 We suffer time because we are not able to consider light speed! To have a conscious of it... so our universe expand slower than the real universe. That difference gives us "time". Time is just the consequence of an error between the real universe and what we can perceive of it. The more you can see, the slower time goes. And that counts for everyone. We re living in the same space time, but, depending on your intellectual skills, time stretches from one to the other. Cheers. Charles Rouffilange
  8. Space is just made of nothing. There is no real space as we picture it. If you take earth as the observer, our planète is "touching" the sun. Relativity stops time in earth movement towards the sun created by gravity. But when space contracts enough, time stop and so the mouvement. It touches the sun as we never touched nothing. Maths dictates that distance can only diminish to an infinitely small size, so we shall never create a contact... Could maths be wrong? I tell you.. no it can't. Relativity makes us stop our move towards matter because of space contraction. I'm working on origin of gravity and brownien movements. Energie cannot be by itself, yes, but Then, how come matter provide energie? Where does it come from? What physical concept create this energie? Differential pressure I tell you. Between empty space(Nothing, no matter) and non empty space(matter). What has to be specified is that the actual volume occupied by matter is still occupied by nothing too. Our universe is 2 dimensional at the end. Creation of time is to be taken as a mistake, an anomaly. Reality is to be understood with no time factor. Because, time factor involves death and so emotions, and so disturbs the signal of understanding, giving worth to unworthy parameters. You want to understand the universe, you have to start with creating the appropriate referential. Universe="infinity"(to be discussed later, because, universe is as infinite than finite.) So knowing the universe is the same as knowing yourself, and if yourself is the universe, you don't a shit about time... So take it out your thinking for more clarifications. Thanks for reading.feedback much appreciated. Best regards to all and happy new year! Charles R.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.