Speculations

.....Quantificational expression is not just secondary because of some describable subjectivity, but that quantification is only demonstrant through the observer's existence therefore, what we experience is of an inherent inversality. This means that experienced realism is of a representative infinite-supposition, that makes the content of quantification and the observer synonymous aspects, a supra-presuppositional context, thus representing a type of equality between the two that quantificationing betrays, thus any description of an observer, that is in any way separated from the wholeness of reality, is incomplete, much like stating that 5 = 3 when the whole is repres…

Whilst musing on a statistical question I had a thought. Consider an isolated box of gas. The expectation is that the particles will be evenly distributed throughout the box. This is shown in fig 1 where there are 3 particles in each subdivision. Now as the particles move about consider the situation where two particles have temporarily moved from other divisions, B and D into division A. This is shown in fig2 This constitutes a local decrease in entropy in A and an corresponding increase in B and D since the overall or global entropy must remain constant. Now this must be true however small the divisions or however large the box. So the …

so I recenIly made a discovery with a flashlight that you can do in your own home, that let's you see with your own eyes a perfect grid pattern energy and a neutral rotational energy that moves counter clockwise and is constant, I have looked over the internet and haven't found a hint of these energies. And I k ow you say speculation but this is something you see with your own eyes with focus and conecentraition, there are others like a triangular pattern but I haven't seemed to mapped it quite yet, all with different colors and speeds, but the same rotational energy you see with your eyes appears in static on the tv if you put a fine a dead channel, reply if you want to …

The Bousso limit is a holographic hypothesis, the maximum amount of information on the border of the light sphere is equal to its surface area. I = A / 4 I propose to generalize this result for all cases of motion, for fixed and light holographic screens. Information equals speed times screen area I = v A / 4 This result is interesting because it gives a different interpretation of the velocity addition theorem based on the Fisher metric 24.pdf

We live in four dimensions. Time/light is the first dimension. The basic foundation of all reality is time/wave/frequency. These properties all exist in the first dimension. Photon's only come into existence (for us in the fourth dimension) when they interact with our dimension. They are the ultimate time travellers. In the absense of light (time) linear velocity shifts down to a lower dimension and starts to take on the qualities of a wave/frequency. All higher dimensions drop one level and assume the properties of the lower dimension. A particle drops out of the fourth dimensions and becomes a three dimensional being. It's linear velocity starts to take on the qualities…

This is the calculation Swansnot was asking for. If I made any newbie mistake feel free to point it out instead of yelling at me about it, thanks. So Argon gas has a atomic number of 18, which means it has 18 electrons. When an electric field or enough energy is applied to the Argon gas it would strip an electron off call the ionization energy. The result is if enough electron is stripped off it would turn the Argon gas into Argon plasma like the video below. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TrZxUdJcxNk Now I want to produce enough energy to satisfy the formula for E=mc^2. I would use a mass of 1kg and that would get me an energy of 9*10^16 joules. I would a…

Proposed on the basis of the model preons, I obtained an empirical formula for all energy scales (neutrinos, standard model, theories of great unification, planck scale). Mn / Mq = (Mg / Mp) 2 Mn = 0.13 eV Mq = 1 GeV Mg = 10^14 GeV Mp = 10^19 GeV The great thing is the relationship between these scales based on this one formula. E = 1 / Mp2 ∫dA dB dC Where A, B, C are parameters of the braid topology in the form of gravitational field lines. This formula shows that the energy of the particles is a combination of the field fluxes A, B, C in the spit topology. In general, the uniform dimensions of the braids are the…

Quantum entanglement would be one instantaneous force observed, the photon's speed of light another. Although, it's currently assumed that photons are always moving at the speed of light upon creation. What if these are connected and a clue to how matter basically operates? (Previous meandering post aside. If these ideas are out there, I may as well discuss them.)

Information technology have constant form: zero(0) & one(1) With zero(0) is no conductive electricity, or "0" is no electricity. And one(1) is conductive electricity, or "1" is have electricity. OK, this is about information tech. And now I want to associate with physics: "0" is no power energy "1" is have power energy But in information tech not mean electricity stronger or weaker in "1" value. But in physics field, if we intergrate with this recipe: 1 = 1/10 x 10 = 1/100 x 100 = 1/1000 x 1000 = 1/1000.. x 1000.. = 1 1 = 0,1 x 10 = 0,01 x 100 = 0,001 x 1000 = 0,00...1 x 1000.. = 1 In final conclusion, va…

md65536; A measures the length of objects by recording the time of reflected light signals as they pass. In the top view, initial conditions are m1 and m2 at rest in the A frame. Each is 1 unit in length and 1 unit apart. In the middle view, m1 and m2 are moving at .6 toward A. A measures their length as .8 units. In the bottom view, A is moving at .6, past m1 and m2, but assumes a pseudo rest frame, with m1 and m2 moving past him. A measures the lengths and the separation as .8 unit. The measurements of the middle view differ from those of the bottom view. Length contraction is a change in the em forces that bond molecules. This phe…

While I realize some of what I'm about to say will bear the hallmarks of pseudoscience, I hope once people read it they will see the merit and the moderators won't remove it out of hand. This isn't an attempt to avoid peer review, it's a rush towards it. Abstract: This theory will attempt to explain all matter, energy, space and time in the universe as massless momentum expressed in different dimensions. The core postulation is that all energy at the most basic level is inherently directional. This comes from over a decade of research breaking down each possible clue to the base components of matter and how they may operate to unite as many concepts as pos…

Based on Strange's question about how I came up with 1km distance for plasma generation in mid air. Well, first thing we need to know is how to create plasma in mid air and Aerial Burton has a good idea about doing it from the video below. Now for the electron density in air for plasma generated with this method is around 10^15 electrons per cm^3(this means 10^21 electrons per m^3). Normal air is mostly O^2 which gives a molarization energy of around 1320KJ. So If you do the math to find the amount of plasma you need to satisfy E=mc^2 equation you will find that you need about 1km of plasma which is inefficient. On another hand you can compress the gas and …

I might go straight to the proposal. Consider that the interior of black holes (BH)s only contain negative energy densities, also known as negative masses. These negative masses have been predicted to be repulsive by other famous physicists such as H. Bondi and W. B. Bonnor, but have not been taken seriously due to a paradox called "runaway motion" which takes place between masses of different signs. These negative masses would be created from infalling particles to the BH by a time transformation taking place at the event horizon, which only switches to antigravitational interactions, without violating Einstein's equivalence principle. The original S…

There is an interesting fact, if the de Broglie wavelength is equal to the Planck length, then the momentum is determined on the Planck scale L= 10 {-35} m p = m v = h k = h / L = 60 ( kg m/s) A person lives with such an momentum (60 kg, 1 m / s) , intelligent creature. I think this is not a simple coincidence, on the Planck scale the concept of space-time is replaced by quantum gravity, moreover, the quantum theory is modified (generalized uncertainty principle). This means that the wave properties on the Planck scale should disappear (the many-worlds interpretation disappears, a single self remains), the border between the quantum world and the cl…

Some aspects of special relativity can be defined through the geometry of entanglement, such quantities as holographic screens, speed, time. The main focus is on the entangled empty space entropy as the basis for the emergence of holography in special relativity sp.pdf

Particle wave duality. I can’t remember where, book or video, probably video maybe both, but it was presented amazingly that a particle could pass through two slits at the same time. To me that would be amazing. So, I question it. It’s difficult for me to accept, as I understand the concept. Of course it could be my understanding. I read that for what seems the most part particles only exist for a short time. Also, amazingly presented as popping in and out of existence. Then there is my understanding of Heisenberg‘s uncertainty principle. Note, I am not questioning it. I am accepting it as true to a point, and that point is that you can’t measure both at …

Deep into this rabbit hole, soon to be collaborating with a researcher who will carry out extensive molecular modelling on these proposed structures. Part shameless plug but also looking for feedback - I've been working at getting my thoughts together on a website - SPAM LINK DELETED These ideas seem to illicit some upset responses from people - not my intention! I just have a genuine curiosity and reserve the right to be completely wrong about all this...

If the ship underwent contraction as it approached light-speed, wouldn't the hydrogen atoms inside the ship get so squeezed together, that they underwent nuclear fusion, and blew the ship apart in a gigantic nuclear explosion?

i apologize if I'm posting in the wrong forum, but I signed up just a matter of moments ago and didn't see an obvious candidate to post this in. What I'm going to describe, I have to believe, is commonplace. Yet I've never heard -- or sought -- an answer for it. Perhaps others can provide insight. This concerns what I describe in the title as instant pre-cognition while in a dream state. I'll give you the example which sparked my participation here. It occurred ten minutes ago at the end of a dream, so I have no doubt that I'm reporting it as I experienced it. First off, I was in the show "Game of Thrones" which was enormously exciting. It was a longish, multi-s…

I agree. That's only an analogy with a structure that could in principle be in agreement with the "wave-particle duality" concept. It is not a given structure for light or any particle. For all of you to have an idea of what I'm talking about, the special structure I gave for a photon is basically a pair of rings of current, one positively charged, the other negatively charged and travelling together at an equilibrium distance equal to half of the De Broglie lambda. They also have a protective shield around which acts in the case of collisions with other particles. The diffraction behavior is explained then as in the "Photons diffraction" pdf file I have a…

The establishment of the Maxwell equations marks the perfection of the classical physics. But it is resolved from the Maxwell equations that the velocity of light is a constant. To explain the confict between the Maxwell equations and the classical physics, Lorentz revised the Galilean transformation to Lorentz transformation. Since the invariableness of the light velocity is veried by Michelson and Morley experiment, the light velocity has been accepted by people as a constant, and thus the special relativity put forward by Einstein. According to the special relativity theory equation: Suppose that R1 and R2 are both inertial reference systems whose relative…

In past discussions, for those who recall or have interest, I described a diminished functional similarity specific to both the schizophrenic brain and the dreaming brain. Generally, both brains experience a decreased state of prefrontal blood flow (hypofrontality), which suggests decreased prefrontal brain activity. This prominent physiological effect that both brains appear to share suggests some shared root cause, which is not my focus in this discussions. My focus is the hallucinatory nature of schizophrenia relative to the nature of dreaming. My speculation is that schizophrenic hallucinations are similar to dreams in that they are interpretive responses to stimu…

Is it possible to build spacetime based on system without time and dynamic? It looks as it is not possible. However, seems as there is way to derive spacetime based on system without time and dynamic. I wrote article how it can be done. Link to article is: https://vixra.org/abs/1812.0157 Or, direct link to pdf document: https://vixra.org/pdf/1812.0157v5.pdf In the article, I propose following model: 1. Time and dynamic is absent on fundamental level. No any motion, no energy, nothing related to time and dynamic on fundamental level 2. On fundamental level there is Euclidean space, with al least 4 dimensions. (And yes, I know about imp…

Most of them directly use GEM, like Gravity Probe B - please specify experiment and we can discuss it. This question is not only "alternative history", but also many e.g. in SETI hypothesize existence of other civilizations - it might be worth understanding if their physics would be based on GR, or maybe on adding corrections to GEM - which might asymptotically reach GR? Not having Einstein, which experiment could convince e.g. them that it is necessary to give up flat spacetime and introduce intrinsic curvature?

This was going to end up here anyway. Using plancks constant times the grav constant over c^3 for lp and 5th power for lt I multiplied 9^28 into it as the numerator and it equated to the planck mass and when divided by the wavelength of a photon I got the planck density synonymous with the planck temperature. That is, irrc. I have it all written down. Anyway what is being said is that there is a limit to gravitation where the planck time is exceeded there is a recurring rescaling of c and the planck constants at 1/9^28th scale in the singularity collapse where the material achieved stability again. At half that miniaturized recursive constants volume, we picture…