Raider5678

Senior Members
  • Content Count

    2553
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Raider5678 last won the day on April 13 2018

Raider5678 had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

35 Good

3 Followers

About Raider5678

  • Rank
    Primate
  • Birthday 10/27/2002

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://jraider5678@gmail.com

Profile Information

  • Location
    Pennslyvania
  • Interests
    Physics, engineering, space, science in general with the exception of biology, and most of all: everything that I find interesting.
  • College Major/Degree
    Nothing
  • Favorite Area of Science
    Space

Recent Profile Visitors

17361 profile views
  1. Raider5678

    Great article about the 2017 neutron star merger

    I remember being a kid somewhere and someone told me we would run out of gold to put in our electronics eventually.(Now that I'm older I find it unlikely) Out of curiosity, was any plutonium created? Or is that not created when stars merge?
  2. Raider5678

    Dangerous politic climate

    This is the same exact type of bull shit false equivalence you have a habit of accusing anyone who disagrees with you of. That isn't what he said, and your repeated pathetic attempts to lie about what he says is disgusting. We can have a perfectly normal discussion without you constantly accusing him of trying to censor you, creating false equivalences, making up false narratives, derailing the thread, making a mountain out of a molehill, and making bogus assertions. To quote you:
  3. Raider5678

    Dangerous politic climate

    Do you have anything to add to this discussion besides repeatedly attacking J.C. MacSwell and flipping out on him for everything he says? FTFY
  4. Raider5678

    Dangerous politic climate

    Your definition of politically charged is telling the truth?
  5. Raider5678

    Dangerous politic climate

    So you were talking to Ten Oz? He was the only person who said anything prior to me.
  6. Raider5678

    Dangerous politic climate

    President calls the media an enemy of the people. It's inciting violence. Media makes jokes like "Where's John Wilke's Booth when you need him?" It's freedom of speech.
  7. Raider5678

    Dangerous politic climate

    Oh, so if Democrats denounce the violence, then they're all good. ALright. Republicans have denounced almost every single attack, including the one where pipe bombs were sent. So they're all good. Glad we can agree, so let's move on. People have been calling Trump "Hitler" and "Worse than Osama Bin Laden." Do you think people spreading those stories are unaware of the connection? If people calling AOC are actually trying to call for her to be killed, then so are the people calling Trump Hitler and Osama Bin Laden. Therefore, the whole lot of them should be thrown in jail. However, that doesn't fit your narrative. It's only one-sided where Republicans are advocating violence against Democrats. Pointing to "other sides" in direct response to a statement "It's only their side, not ours" is pointing out the hypocrisy that is there. The key to solving the underlying problem of those inciting violence is to acknowledge the problem exists, instead of denying it where it's not in your favor. I agree, a lot of what these people are saying is wrong. I haven't said it wasn't. I don't think anybody here is. But the fact that it's supposedly one side is utterly false, and I will point it out. Ah. One example was incorrect. Clearly, all 550 of them were just whataboutism.
  8. Raider5678

    Dangerous politic climate

    No. There is free speech. They're not there calling for death. Just because there are a bunch of idiots who try to blame the media for their actions, doesn't mean it's so. Everyone has individual responsibility for what they do. A Republican party office was burned to the ground. A Republican senator was beaten half to death in his yard. A Republican Congressional candidate was attacked by a man with a switchblade. There have been over 550 recorded physical attacks on Republicans* in the last year. But it's one side. *This is only counting ones where the motive was that they were Republicans. A random robbery against a republican doesn't count, for example. Does liberal-leaning media have the same responsibility? MSNBC's host declared Trump worse than Osama Bin Laden. We killed Osama Bin Laden, in case you didn't know. Or celeberties asking "Where's John Wilkes Booth when you need him?" But I'm sure she was just referencing peaceful protest there.
  9. Raider5678

    Shamima Begum

    I read the link. Citizenship can be revoked as long as she doesn't become stateless. At the moment, according to Bangladesh law, she is a citizen of Bangladesh. So if it comes down to who's doing something illegal, it's Bangladesh. Either way, your narrative that she can be punished with something that those over 21 can't be, is completely false. It has much less to do with age, and more to do with if you have citizenship to another country or not. She turned her back on the UK. 15 at the time or not, she committed treason, and she's been convicted of that by extension of confession.(She confessed to committing something that is known as treason. So it's a confession to committing treason by extension.) And finally, she doesn't want a citizenship to the UK. The second she lands on the ground, she'll be arrested, sentenced, and locked in prison for a significant period of time. According to her, she's shocked the UK would do something like this. She thinks it's unjust that the UK sees her as a threat. I mean. All she did was support ISIS. And say that the 22 civilians who died by a suicide bomber in her home country deserved it. How dare they? She's just an innocent little girl, after all. All these big mean men are just bullying her. Stateless or not, I don't see why the UK can't just revoke her citizenship.
  10. Raider5678

    Shamima Begum

    This is a complete red herring. She's not 2. Yes. Could you link me to the law that states this?
  11. Raider5678

    Shamima Begum

    Yes. Too many people attempting to reduce the responsibility of others to accept the consequences of their actions.
  12. Raider5678

    Shamima Begum

    The UK's high treason is defined as this: "Offences constituting high treason include plotting the murder of the sovereign; committing adultery with the sovereign's consort, with the sovereign's eldest unmarried daughter, or with the wife of the heir to the throne; levying war against the sovereign and adhering to the sovereign's enemies, giving them aid or comfort; and attempting to undermine the lawfully established line of succession." And I agree. She deserves a trial to determine the punishment. But until then, she's already been convicted of high treason against the United Kingdom.
  13. Raider5678

    Shamima Begum

    And she will. It's already in the process.
  14. Raider5678

    Shamima Begum

    He was referring to what she did. She didn't simply make an opinion. She acted upon that opinion and supported a declared enemy of the United Kingdom. That is treason. Except this is a red herring. Because this is not the case. The evidence is not secret, her parent's citizenship is not being revoked, and it's not suspected actions. It's real actions.
  15. Raider5678

    Shamima Begum

    Yes. Some teenage boys rape girls. What teenager hasn't made a mistake? Whether you consider it a mistake or not, you should live with the consequences of your actions. That's called responsibility.