Speculations

I have provided a special clock that measures time !

Hi, how big is the Universe ?

The nuerological reference frame , NRF for short , is a more advanced way of explaining the mind. The NRF is entangled with the universe when your eyes are open and is your conscious reference frame , making note of all we sense , storing information we gain .

My point of view about time The human observer invented the concept of time and clock because it was difficult for him to measure change and speed of change (rapidity of change or slowness of change) which along with: space, matter, energy, forces, fields, .... are fundamental constituents and properties of the universe. Time is nothing but the relationship between change and the speed of change. Time only makes sense for what is changing at a certain speed, so it is a function of these two. Time is relative depending on the nature of the change: life time, half-life for radioactive substances, reaction time, astronomical time ....

Hello , I have an experiment that may demonstrate the existence of an Aether . In theory the experiment should work but the potential results of the experiment could be highly dangerous with several possible outcomes. The physics of the experiment seems viable physics and there is a great chance for success ! The problem I have , how do I explain the experiment here when there is potential dangers ? I wouldn't want the results to end up in the ''wrong hands'' . This isn't the sort of experiment I can do at home ! One of the possible good outcomes of the experiment , is that we invent a way to ''siphon'' spatial energy .

Hi. I hade one speculation/discussion here, but it got locked. Do anyone know of any forum where I can speculate and discuss wildly, about space/time and quantum physics without being locked out and where there is people who know about gravitational waves, general relativity and quantum physics who can help me get any of my thought experiments discussed, if they can be anything of interest ? Regards MagI --------------------------------

----------------------------------------------------- In the movie Interstellar(2014) they live on planet Gargantua near a black hole and time is moving much slower. One hour on the planet would be 7 years on earth. Lets say time moved much slower on the planet. They would see the planets and stars moving like white stripes in the night sky. The planets would seem to be as a cloud around the sun in its solar system. They would see time and the speed of light in space moving much much faster than on the planet. Now lets say it is like that in micro-cosmos. Time is moving much faster in particle physics. Our time is much slower than …

Origins of Natural Order A Strong Bond Between Geometry, Mathematics, and Physics S. Solomon © 2022 Abstract: An omission occurred during the early development of our formal geometric knowledge, it was a notable Problem that lacked a satisfactory Solution, which was eventually set aside and nearly forgotten about over time. Since then, the many advances in geometry, mathematics, and physics now constitute the rigor, logic &amp…

My Quantitative theory coincides with Einstein's, is its continuation; without using space, speed, acceleration, energy, and so on and so forth: Postulate I: In this volume there is only this exact number of minimal elements. This postulate is ergodic, in the spirit of Poincare recurrence theorem. Einstein: Postulate 1 (Einstein's principle of relativity). The laws of nature are the same in all coordinate systems moving rectilinearly and uniformly relative to each other. Monotheism in both theories. Postulate II: The inclusion time of the minimum element in any set is the minimum possible. Einstein the same: Postulate 2 (the princip…

1. STM Let us accept an existence of homogenous formation space-time-matter, shortly STM. STM = S + TM = T + SM = M + ST [spacetimematter = space + timematter = time + spacematter = matter + spacetime] M + ST is concerning macroscopic conditions. If - M, + ST matter loses then spacetime profit, it is distance - perspective, objects decrease with distance - ordinary contraction. If + M, - ST matter profit then spacetime loses, it is bringing closer - perspective, objects increase in progress of bringing closer - ordinary dilatation. S + TM is concerning microscopic conditions. If - TM, + S timematter loses then space profit, it leads to…

Hello! Because I'm not how to take pictures, I put this link: which the moderators removed per Rule 2.7 I hope to get feedback.

Is this type of brain a fascination? Is this a rarity? I feel I need to bring attention to this. I came into this over two years knowing nothing about the brain. I am the only one that has ever had access to this childlike state. And his powers over the brain phenomenal! There was input over 40 years, from his outside world altered state. Blocked were memories of childhood trauma. From my understanding when in childlike state, experienced flashbacks of this trauma. Over two years he had enlisted me through my subconscious, I was unaware of it at the time, to bring him information on the brain. He was intent on resolving the flashbacks. He was suffering over 40 years wi…

Hello. Here is a topic which is not one of the simplest. Here is the proposal for a new metric which has the principle of being able to take into account cosmic inflation in relation to the expansion of the universe. Indeed its mechanism is that of the interpretation and for a gravitational singularity of a single-particle entropic convergence. IOW what is defined as a singularity with infinite value would then only be an interpretation of a paricle at rest. The expansion of the particle from its singular point which expresses its rest will therefore propagate asymmetrically in space-time. At first, the entropy of a supermassive black hole is only the particle's alte…

I read of 3 phase motor cores, without the armature, as having some small weight loss when energized. Although the evidence is not much more that anecdotal, it does seem as an interesting experiment, although any weight loss is most likely due to interactions with the earth's magnetic field, from other external sources such as house wiring or simple error. I wonder if anyone on the forum has personally made a device to see if any effects could be seen, as the experiment itself could be a simple one to fabricate. Thanks for any input.

I got a new theory about the Down Quark, gravity, black holes and dark matter. I wrote a small paper about it. Who should I send it to ?

It sounds like something that wouldn't happen naturally or by accident. Sounds like something that would take some preparation to set up. Yet regardless of how you feel about deities creating universes, it would seem that the more important thing to figure out is: what is spacetime made of? ...and can I test a small piece of it in the lab?

Hello, Here are in pictures of the evolution of the universe as you've probably never seen it. References: Spoiler 1. John. D. Barrow; Mariusz. P. Dabrowski; Oscillating universes. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astro nomical Society 1995, 275, 850-862, 10.1093/mnras/275.3.850. [82] [83] [84] 2. Yun-Song Piao; Yuan-Zhong Zhang; Inflation in oscillating universe. Nuclear Physics B 2005, 725 , 265-274, 10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2005.07.021. 3. Itzhak Goldman; Nathan Rosen; Gravitation Theory and Oscillating Universe. Physical Review D 1972, 5, 1285-1287, 10.1103/physrevd.5.1285. 4. Roy A. Briere; LHCb Collabor…

After doing 3 years of professional photography and also avid research into astronomy I am convinced with the technology that we have that we can finally debunk the conspiracy of whether or not we actually landed on the moon. This means no offense to the families of astronauts that have claimed to make the trip, however this monolithic task of being on the moon within the decade (according to JFK) was literally unbelievable. We have access to photos and videos of this event. We can then process those images to see if it was fallacy or reality. Note: I was born in the 90’s therefore I was unable to witness this event in person. However I have accumulated as …

There are three dimensions of space. Four dimensions of space time. Isn't the fifth dimension e (as in E=MC²) ? There seems to be five properties of an event, not four. Space time without the involvement of energy doesn't do anything. It might as well not exist. And does time actually exist, without changes in the location of energy? So energy is more of a dimension than time. So I'm proposing that events occur in five dimensions. Whether you could work out a system of maths for that is beyond me though.

Could not upload full file nor writing. Please view on social platforms. Time - (a tangible noun) with (repeating change) Distance = (a tangible noun) with (no change) Combine Logics, maths, arts, linguistics, etc... MAINLY LOGICS Think Logically. DEFINE IT = WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE = 1 SOCIAL PERSPECTIVE Syntax garbled in upload. Contact or view on other platform. TIME IS NOT SECOND JUST AS SQUARE IS NOT RECTANGLE

In the middle of the last century, there was a theory of the Soviet astrophysicist Nikolai Kozyrev, according to which time, not hydrogen, burns in the stars. https://docviewer.yandex.ru/?tm=1659347015&tld=ru&lang=en&name=leivaditis_comments.pdf&text=kozyrev+'s+theory&url=http%3A//www.chronos.msu.ru/old/RREPORTS/kozyrev_100/leivaditis_comments.pdf&lr=213&mime=pdf&l10n=ru&sign=d4dd4d67cd7f8819ad695224d85b347d&keyno=0 But it did not pass the experimental test.

The purpose with this 'experiment' is in using one prediction or another to see if there are any strengths 'outside' of probability (a now factor) that bind us to a supposed 'future'. I'm new here and don't know anything much about physics anyhow. And don't believe that Time exists myself. But as there are actual physicists out there who do theorize that Time may be real, then I figure it might be possible to test out those claims in some way if it only can done to a small degree. That is if the future is real (Doc Brown gets it wrong) it might be that we can in some way detect its existence from this the present. For example: The next transit of Venus is set to…

No material can have a net negative charge. Negative charges are produced by electrons and they can only exist in the atomic structure attracted by the positive nucleus of the atoms. The maximum number of electrons that any material can have is that which neutralizes the positive charges of the nucleus. More electrons than this can only be free electrons and they would repel each other out of the material. Then any material can only be neutral or positive charged. Negative ions also don't actually exist. Only more or less positive ions exist.

I do think that were are not being pulled towards the center of the Earth. We are being either pushed towards the center of the Earth. Or more like falling towards the center of the Earth.

I know this is far out there but is the concept of all black holes ending up at the big bang make sense? this just popped in my head bit black holes end up in a singularity. could this singularity be the the big bang? black holes could could result in a hole in time and space and it makes sense that they could could connect with the singularity of the big bang. have any any scientific papers suggested this possibility?