Speculations

A possible model for infinity is that there is an infinitely large void (for lack of a better word) which contains "all of existence", in which an infinity of mega and micro universes stretch or condense infinitely, larger or smaller within all dimensions Thus; each universe is relative to some other universe in size or volume. The absolutely smallest indivisible fundamental particle in our universe, might make up countless separate, infinitesimal tiny finite universes, that become the fundamental particles or building blocks of still larger and larger universes, within the mega-void that makes up all of existence.. There could be an infinite number of these relativ…

I have an idea related to gravity and tensor force. If the entanglement phenomena is a result of a sort of communication between entangled particles, can a brief entanglement arise spontaneously between 2 remote particles? Imagine two remote groupings of particles A and B. If the spin-state of one particular particle of group A, has a random perfect match of the spin state of a particle in group B....are they not defacto, entangled? And, though they will quickly "untangle", for they are not isolated, for a brief finite period they were entangled, and some information was shared instantaneously, or at "the speed of gravity". So this "make and break" pulsing is a net t…

Speed of light is constant if it travels from object in one frame to an object in the same frame.When light travels from approaching frame it is slower.When light travels from escaping frame it is faster.Round-trip shows constant speed.

Read And Know Any Of The Winning Team(s) Before The Game Is Played! Germany the host nation of 2006 world cup CANNOT beat Costa Rica ! Watch out for the rest to ascertain the wonders o the Universal Mind!

1. What is the difference between "speculations" and "conspiracies"? (Circular argument) Some part of the definition for the term, "conspiracy", covers "speculation". 2. The example of the Snowden episode tells us, the audience and readers, that it is possible for agencies to collaborate keeping things hidden. This is a proven fact. 3. Just because it derives from "YouTube" does not discredit the source or evidence. This is a fallacy, it is called: Genetic Fallacy. For instance; there are videos, on Youtube, concerning Snowden. 4. Therefore, there are some things on YouTube which could be proven to be based on empirical evidence and factual information. If we …

in regards to the quantum "resting points" of a particular particle's value being of a discrete quantum value, I say that there is a finite period of time between value changes. This period is the plank-length of time, or minimum period of time allowable in this universe, and is (currently) immeasurable, and a smaller period of time cannot exist in physical reality. This period is perhaps equivalent to the other three identifiable superluminal speeds of 1. straight-line gravitational effects between orbiting bodies 2. speed of entanglement failure regardless of positions of said particles 3. speed of early universe's expansion rate due to inflation....edd what establi…

If the inflation of the immediate post big bang era, essentially caused a sea of hot primordial energy/matter to appear instantaneously at a given size, what caused that size limit? If this "instantaneous" expression is not instantaneous, and is of some finite rate, but superliminal, then perhaps a sort of communication was between every particle, giving a defacto entanglement to the entire early universe. This entanglement would be due to each particle being of the exact same description, leading to a perfectly homogenous state. If the entangled particles are exchanging information with each other at a fixed speed, then the farther apart the particular points of primord…

perhaps present day cosmic expansion acceleration is enhanced by an upper limit in the gravity's ability to function past a certain physical distance. If gravity is a resultant of momentary entanglements, and if there is an near instantaneous constant speed of communications between these momentarily entangled particles, then the comm. freq. must increase past the upper limit of comm. bandwidth if the particles are more distant than the bandwidth can supply the back and forth messaging, to allow action to take place. This would allow a gravitational isolation from any inner material in an expanding shell as the outer edge pulls itself out of range by becoming "silent" t…

Semjase had an earlier post concerning this topic. I would like to add a "critical thinking" component to the discussion. There are collaborating evidence from other sources which confirms secret projects by NASA and other allied agencies whether American or non-American. Evidence: Youtube videos: "Secret Structures on the Moon" by Sirius Disclosure "E.T. Shoot at Fort Dix" by Sirius Disclosure "UFO Crash in Peru" by Sirius Disclosure The above evidence suggests international collaboration to hide the truth concerning the current and past interaction of E.T.s and Earth's history. Therefore, by Occam's Razor, we could conclude that the Apoll…

Hello, i M back with a brand new idea for holding together ustable atoms, or forms of matter for informational purposes. First you would need a vacum chamber, and electromagnetic sphere and a source of gluons. Then, in a selerate chamber with the heavy element, you would bombard it with a constan stream of gluons. Please help me fine tune this idea!

I used to believe that nothing was impossible, but then I thought that nothing can possibly occur more than the current point of interest. Maybe something could occur the same exact amount, but never more.

According to the paradigm that existed for centuries, all thoughts and arguments in favor of (and against) absolute motion have always been associated with absolute space (or the ether) and, in fact, these two concepts have always been inseparable in our thoughts, i.e. 'absolute motion is relative to an objective absolute space'. Reconciliation of the Sagnac effect with Michelson-Morley (MM) experiment null result has always been a daunting task. The Sagnac experiments remained 'impossible' to be reconciled with all theories of relativity. This paper discloses the reason why solving this paradox remained a daunting task for almost a century: it required a paradigm shift!!…

As regards the greenhouse effect, that would be no problem. We'd scrap all the CO2-producing coal and gas powered plants, and switch over completely to CO2-clean atomic power stations. The radioactive waste products from these stations, would be safely disposed of in the Pacific Ocean. Specifically, by being dropped into the Challenger Deep. This has 7 miles of seawater over it, which should provide more than adequate shielding.

I first like to say that I'm excited that there is a place where people like-minded can share ideas and theories. Most people that hear me babbling on about my theories are either too intoxicated or just don't really care. Is just that certain things seem inevitable to me and are forming around us as we speak and are definitely,in my mind, going to happen within the next 10-20 years (or as fast our government will let us do it). So I'm new here, glad to meet everyone, let's get on to my latest idea..... First of all, we all agree that the development of technology, as well as our understanding of our own personal brain and DNA, is developing exponentially. …

I don't think 0.999... = 1. If 0.999... = 1, then 1 - 0.999... = 0. But, it does not turn out to be 0. Instead, it turns out to be infinitesimal. If 0.999... = 1, it would be 0. What do you think? Does 0.999 recurring equal one?

CONTROVERSIAL: “COLECTIVISM” OF MATTER --- “INDIVIDUALIZM “ OF ANTIMATTER. Don’t judge, and don’t deride me before listening till end. It is not a thread about sociology, is about physic’s nature of reality, in viewpoint of a lay-man. It’s only a “RHETORICAL’ empty stuff. In the sequel of my threads about particularity of nature ‘s reality, where I suggest that “unique sub-particles” of matter and anti-matter are the only protagonist of this reality, I have get stuck in mud toward questions I made myself: Why electron and proton have different mass and radius from each other? Why the antimatter is so scarce , instead visible mater so abundant? My alleged hypothesis…

If I have your attention know please keep reading, I simply can't do this alone. A bit about my self, I'm not a scientist or a science studnet. This past semester I was a Game Programming Student and that created a new thought pattern in my head. A pattern of Logic. After watching a Program on Sci-Fi Discovery about Black Holes a thought crossed my mnd. Following Logic I've come up with a new "theroy". However, I don't have any resources to investigate my "therory" on Not only What the Big Bang was but also on What kind of event had to happen to cause it. All I need is two things, 1. Peek someone's curiosity, who has the capablitiy to get my second need. 2. I…

Hi. Would you please give an opinion/speculate if 1.- The craft in both pictures -is the same or they are different ? [Check proportions related to people size and your skills] 2.- Any smell to photoshop ? [clutch diaphragm?] ----> http://s588.photobucket.com/user/Innernet/media/Snowed_zps0108618d.jpg.html ----> http://s588.photobucket.com/user/Innernet/media/Pulled_zps803c4955.jpg.html

I am wanting to make an animal cell from DNA, RNA, Protein, and Fatty Acids as well as Glucose and other sugars. I am wondering. Should I start with the cell membrane or the nucleus and nucleolus?Eukaryotic cell from scratch.txt

I am currently working on a theory for the coefficient of lift. Here is what I have so far: CL=Δp/q Where Δp is the change in pressure between the top and bottom of the airfoil, and q is the dynamic pressure; q=1/2ρv2 This is because of the following: The force of lift would also be equal to AΔp, since the force of lift depends on the change in pressure between the wings and the cross sectional area. Because the force of lift is qACL, then we can write the coefficient of lift as AΔp/qA, which simplifies to Δp/q. Now, I have to find out the value of Δp. What do you think so far?

when photon splits into positron and electron .the pair produced is expected to be associated with gravitational field which indicates that in addition to electromagnetic field photon is also carrier of gravitational field

Was 9/11 planned by <name removed by mod>? This video says so. <video also removed by mod>

outbreeding depression refers to cases where offspring from crosses between two different different populations have a lower level of fitness than offspring from crosses between individuals from the same population. One of the ways that outbreeding depression can occur is by the breakdown of biochemical or physiological compatibilities between genes in the different breeding populations. Within local, isolated breeding populations, alleles are selected for their positive, overall effects in complementary combination with other specific alleles. Due to nonadditive gene action, the same genes may have rather different effects in different genetic backgrounds--hence, the…

I believe that gravity is a push force caused by neutrinos. At the point of the big bang there would of been three fundamental particles that would cause this. Many other particles doing other stuff. Particle one. Neutrino. ( can travel through matter with little loss of energy ) Particle two. (probably hydrogen?) Neutrinos interact weakly with. Particle three. Neutrinos interact completely with and can not pass through. At the point of big bag there would have been trillions of neutrinos traveling through every square centimeter (in every direction )of space every second . Any fundamental particle unable to let them pass through would have t…

I recently thought of this and I admit it is underdeveloped. I thought it might be worth sharing. Criticism is welcome. My idea is that the universe is the result of a SINGLE particle moving at a high/infinite velocity, so that it occupies all space at the same time, creating the illusion of reality.