Speculations
Pseudoscientific or speculatory threads belong here.
The Speculations forum is provided for those who like to hypothesize new ideas in science. To enrich our discussions above the level of Wild Ass Guesswork (WAG) and give as much meaning as possible to such speculations, we do have some special rules to follow:
- Speculations must be backed up by evidence or some sort of proof. If your speculation is untestable, or you don't give us evidence (or a prediction that is testable), your thread will be moved to the Trash Can. If you expect any scientific input, you need to provide a case that science can measure.
- Be civil. As wrong as someone might be, there is no reason to insult them, and there's no reason to get angry if someone points out the flaws in your theory, either.
- Keep it in the Speculations forum. Don't try to use your pet theory to answer questions in the mainstream science forums, and don't hijack other threads to advertise your new theory.
The movement of a thread into (or out of) Speculations is ultimately at the discretion of moderators, and will be determined on a case by case basis.
6798 topics in this forum
-
Hello I am TJ McCaustland, now I obviously do not hold a PHD in Quantum physics, but I would like to propose a new theory that I have. This theory is that atoms when they enter the singularity of a black hole are given a technically infinite velocity due to the nearly infinte density and nearly gravity of a black hole, and all energy (Except kinetic of course) is removed from the atoms, which causes everything except the binding atomic energy (which is tiny) to be lost. Therefore allowing these particles to take on an amplified form of a tachyon effect, all except losing the kinetic energy over time because of the atomic binding energy. Now the interesting thing is you wo…
-
0
Reputation Points
- 28 replies
- 3.9k views
- 1 follower
-
-
“THREE ELECTRIC CHARGES” PARTICLE. (speculation ---- from Lay-man) Even thought I am sure that nobody will share my idea, which is totally in contradiction with everyday physic, I can’t help myself without give out what torments me at night. Have somebody asked himself why electron particle is associated with Compton wave? The same I can say about the proton? And what is a Compton wave, the kind that stands in a limited volume of space? Here is my thought: Exist a series of equations about energies of “particle of matter”: Ex = (e^2 / ( 4 * pi * ε0 * Rx) = mx * C^2 = h * ( C / (2 * pi / α) Rx) = h * fx ….’ Which are numeri…
-
0
Reputation Points
- 5 replies
- 1.4k views
-
-
sunshaker, on 26 Sept 2014 - 12:57 PM, said: I have a thought that it is the "space" around the star where a black hole forms, After a supernova i believe the space is stretched to breaking point, depending on size of star, If the Star is large enough and the gravity well deep enough, The resulting explosion will rip the fabric of space within the gravity well. Something like simple picture below. It is only a thought, Why I have put it into speculation.
-
0
Reputation Points
- 1 reply
- 943 views
-
-
-
This hypothesis eliminates the need for Dark Energy to explain the accelerated expansion of the universe. If we assume the model is correct we can calculate the expansion of our viewable portion of the universe using established and proven standard equations. Observations have been made that supports the diagram within the following link or see attachment. http://www.docdroid.net/hjmx/metropolis-pal-9-12-14.pdf.html Metropolis Pal 9-12-14.pdf
-
0
Reputation Points
- 29 replies
- 4.2k views
- 1 follower
-
-
Plank Law Inverse square LAW your eyes adjusted to the emr frequency by evolution, you see through transparent emr, The sun only transmits BB radiation, that follows the inverse square law , angle and absorbing showing you the visual spectrum. Change of energy, also creating a different viscosity to the constant viscosity of emr. Hence radio waves, spectrum colors, etc , all wavelengths man made effect the constant.
-
0
Reputation Points
- 9 replies
- 3.5k views
- 1 follower
-
-
This topic have been taboo in academic circles, and always have been surrounded by lots of misconceptions and myths, until recently. But now we have the tools to observe systematically anomalies available to almost anyone. With this post I am trying to report what I had found in the last two years after systematically observing them. Anomalies usually are autonomous plasma-like/amorphous objects that can be observed almost in any clear day in daylight at any location in our planet. They usually move at high altitude, since they are small and usually bright they are masked by the sky scattering of visible light like the stars are in daylight. But we know that the sky …
-
0
Reputation Points
- 73 replies
- 15.2k views
- 3 followers
-
-
Background: in the late 1880's michael faraday was researching electromagnetics. during a demonstration a piece of metal was thrown across the room when he turned on his device. not knowing what to make of this the term 'electric wind' was attached to the action. in the same time frame nikola tesla was also working with electromagnetics, and built his famous coil, and gave us the induction motor. he also had something he called free energy. in the mid 1950 thomas townsend brown was researching gravity and magnetic pole reversal. he built several small discs that he could make hover through the use of some type of electromagnetics. i have seen a video of these discs and…
-
0
Reputation Points
- 2 replies
- 1k views
-
-
Hi everybody, Its me again, with a subject related to the one on mass entitled "Look ma, no maths". It is related by means of the principle of mass that the small steps account for. If mass is due to resistance to the change in frequency of the steps that induces the inertial constant motion of the atoms, then this principle might have something to do with our own psychological resistance to change because it induces our constant automatisms too. We have the bad habbit to disqualify our own resistance, because we rely on the resistance of orthers to detect our own one, and because we accuse them to resist without noticing that they need our resistance to do that,…
-
0
Reputation Points
- 41 replies
- 5.2k views
-
-
I speculate that in principle , and from forum information received, that the under diagram would work. Try to speculate something simple
-
0
Reputation Points
- 22 replies
- 2.5k views
-
-
Hello everyone, For the past few months I have been working on a script for a YouTube channel I am currently working on and writing scripts for. Every day I learn new things that I apply to this formula, and it is something that I feel that a lot of people might find interesting, even if they understand nothing about it. That is beyond the point, the point is the formula. Now, keep in mind that I am a High School student, an in no way commit this to being fact, or in any way/shape/form correct. I am not an astrophysicist or have a degree in theoretical physics. With that said, my formula (And explanation as of this time) is as followed- READ FIRST- UP…
-
0
Reputation Points
- 14 replies
- 2.8k views
- 2 followers
-
-
Velocity, wavelength, temperature define a particle's commonality or uniqueness. I see this as something fully explained in something I found called "The Resonance Principle. link removed The scientist worked with a very creative artist and made a Five Part Animated Musical Video Book that expresses a very logical principle. After seeing it, I think you'll understand that every particle can be coalesced into an atomic structure for the sake of creating a usable material. If the particle moves at just the right speed, the movie shows how a single particle by its speed, temperature and wavelength can be unique, a photon, quark, graviton, neutron (speciallly unique and…
-
0
Reputation Points
- 1 reply
- 930 views
-
-
I theorize that we interact with everything, even the simplest natures, but we do not recognize these natures for themselves; rather we progress from their actions, or their substance, which had a hand in the progression which led to the current day, with the current matter, energies and universe. Thus any simple mechanic of a human, can be simplified to the cause of another nature; maybe imagining abstract concepts, combining two things together in an image to represent something else (different to the words we use which restrict everything to singles), is related to something very simple in nature, such as energy, or energy and matter. It's more a query than a theory, I…
-
0
Reputation Points
- 33 replies
- 4.2k views
- 1 follower
-
-
Before I start, I should note that the theory I used to produce the responses from the program that I am about to show was conceived without outside influence by myself at the age of 17. After 9 years of speculation and contemplation, it has come together to produce results that are mind blowing and, what I think personally, revolutionary. I finally got the chance to work on the program that I've been thinking about for so long, and finally it's coming into fruition. A lot of people have complained over the years of how my methods have literally produced no results, but still, people had faith. It's interesting. People simply knew that the ideas that I was postulating…
-
0
Reputation Points
- 60 replies
- 7.8k views
- 1 follower
-
-
I hear scientist are researching technology to upload minds up to computer just like uploading music to your PC from you iPod. If they succeed, could it happen ? Say if you just upload two people's minds up to a computer, than download them back to the other person's brain.
-
0
Reputation Points
- 5 replies
- 1.3k views
- 1 follower
-
-
F=force P=pressure mf=magnetic field m=mass
-
0
Reputation Points
- 132 replies
- 13.5k views
- 1 follower
-
-
Most computers are completely binary. They input and output a bunch of ON's and OFF's. They're only able to process a 2 dimensional world. A world where only ON and OFF exist. How about a blend of ON or OFF? A maybe? Binary computers can't process maybe input so it can't output maybe. But we as humans can. So we take maybe and break it down into it's basic ON's an OFF's. Taking into account the amount of each we then input the ON's, OFF's in sequence. We call this code. I believe there might be a better way. ON and OFF are just symbols for a concept that can be represented by an infinite number of symbols. It's the concept of opposites. Knowi…
-
0
Reputation Points
- 9 replies
- 1.5k views
-
-
I see the big bang as an explosion of a special kind of black hole at the end of it's life. Regular black holes blow up if the aren't fed after a long period, then go in a moderate size pop. I see the universe as having been described by something I call the IBH, or informational black hole. A black hole with so much information in it ,the information described mass, and all other physical objects and fields. The hole "leaked" information in a hawking radiation style emission, describing space/time. After a period of time, the loss of the information to describe space eventually caused a similar pop with the IBH, which of course was much larger than an ordinary black hole…
-
0
Reputation Points
- 24 replies
- 3.1k views
- 1 follower
-
-
Someone, Possibly a Moderator , please tell me why New thoughts and new ways of looking at things are "Trash" ?
-
0
Reputation Points
- 283 replies
- 27.4k views
- 3 followers
-
-
Heyyo Everyone! The topic reviewed today will be about chi. Chi, known as a life force in a living being, can be theoretically used for healing activities, or even the manipulation of the ancient elements (Earth, Fire, Wood, Metal and Water). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qi Many other texts from the past also have similar things with near description to Chi, such as Chakra and the Soul. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chakra http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soul I've been thinking lately, but could the embodiment of emotions be related to Chi? And is Chi used to support our vital organs? For example, have you been into a state of depression? If you have, then you …
-
0
Reputation Points
- 31 replies
- 4.8k views
- 2 followers
-
-
Ok guys pardon any religious vocabulary, I was brought up Catholic and I guess it's the easiest way for my mind to grasp/understand my own concept. a cycle, closed loop, circle pi, one point extends solar systems everything is a cycle imagine…. a beginning… an end… a start a finish. now close the cycle. a circle. a circle has no start or finish. it all comes from a single point from an infinite number (pi) 3.infinity theres a reason we have the concept of whole numbers and fractions, the concept that a fraction can add up to a whole. even numbers are just symbols for concepts. they are in cycled order to help our limited percep…
-
0
Reputation Points
- 59 replies
- 6.4k views
- 2 followers
-
-
-
I often wonder of the webs of light that we do not "see", If there is something we are still missing. I wonder about the focal points where all light from stars converge, Which would be mainly within galaxies, with webs stretching between galaxies. cosmic projectors.
-
0
Reputation Points
- 15 replies
- 1.9k views
-
-
DARK MATTTER by ROY PACKARD I drove down to Seal Beach today. Got a cup of coffee at Bogart's and walked across the street to Eisenhower Park - a piddling little park of about a quarter of an acre in size - but nice. Got a bench overlooking the ocean and sat and did what old men do - supped my coffee, watched the pretty girls and dreamed of days gone by. There weren't any girls today. Just one old lady in a wheel chair being push by her husband who was also in a wheel chair. So I sat and dreamed of days gone by. Beautiful day. Could not have been more so. The temperature was 71 degrees F. There was a gentle Santana wind wafting down from the mountains a…
-
0
Reputation Points
- 7 replies
- 1.9k views
-
-
Gravity energy --- mass energy, two different concepts. Speculation by a lay-man Here are four equations, three of them “relative static” potential energy, between two electric charges and what derive from them, fourth rest energy of electron particle. 1) - - - - ( e / (sqrt (4 * pi * ε ) ) ^2 / Re = 8.187104683*10^-14 Joul 2) - - - - ( sqrt ( G) * (Mpl *sqrt(α) ) ^ 2) / Re = 8.187104662*10*-14 Joul 3) - - - - ( e / (sqrt ( 4 * pi * ε * G) ) ^ 2 * G / Re = 8.187104683*10^-14 Joul 4) - - - ( me * C^2) = (Mpl * C^2) * (Lpl / Re) = 8.187104145* 10^-14 Joul Note: 1-Equation (3) is to show why formal “gravi…
-
0
Reputation Points
- 43 replies
- 5.4k views
-