Speculations

Hey guys, I was just wondering what do people mean when they say "what doesn't kill you can only make you stronger"? And is this always necessarily true? In what situations is the statement true and in what situations is the statement false? When people say this do they mean "what doesn't kill you (but almost does) can only make you stronger"? What's the meaning of this? Has anyone ever heard of this common saying? If so, do you know what it means? Thoughts/opinions would be welcomed and appreciated! Thanks, Clara Tanone

About radius of “electron particle” and the possibility of having it a structure. “ The Standard Model of particle physics is known to be incomplete. Extensions to the StandardModel, such as weak-scale supersymmetry, posit the existence of new particles and interactions that are asymmetric under time reversal (T) and nearly always predict a small yet potentially measurable, (on electron particle ?), of electric dipole moment (EDM), in the range of 10^-27---10^-30 e*r.” This extract is taken by the link given by moderator, in the case of one of my closed post. I am confused because, didn’t this means that range of radius of particle is r = 10^-8----- 10^-12 (cm?), and …

Species Survival Strategy Upon arrival of sustainable clean nuclear & solar energy, fission will be used to form elements needed. The adaptive regenerative process separated from the mechanical, will be living medicine, materials mechanical. 

Given only a single discrete object, is it possible to describe that object solely in terms of its structure? Let us define a discrete object P as an arbitrary piece of matter. What it is is unimportant. Let P constitute a matrix P' propagating infinitely in every dimension. Let us define each point in the matrix P' as P'(x,y,z,t, ...). Further, let every point in the matrix P' constitute a second similar matrix, P", also propagating infinitely in every dimension. Let us define every point in the matrix P" as, e.g., P"(x',y,z, ...), wherein x' denotes the x component of the previous matrix P' is being expanded upon. Let this pattern continue infinitely for…

The conservation of energy implies an absolute reference in the universe. In SR, there is a relativistic mass term, which is connected to the energy balance. Space and time, apart from an energy balance, may appear relative. The relativistic mass term is often discounted and never used as part of relative reference because this is the thorn on the claw of the relative reference assumption. As an example, say we have two space ships in outer space, one with mass M and other other with mass 2M. While all the crews were sleeping, we gave one of the two ships velocity V using energy E. When they awake they see relative velocity V between them but can't tell who is who. W…

faster than light travel is possible by spacial dimensional manipulation. although this technology does not allow you to physically travel faster per say than light it simply allows you to take shortcuts in space. this works by generating an incredibly high density electromagnetic field, to where the flux lines of the magnetic field are incredibly close together. to generate higher density fields you simply have to increase the input volatge or current/power or energy. and inorder to do this you need a custom piece of technology called a vaccuum coil. a vaccuum coil uses tungsten based electron aura technology to focus, compress, and accelerate free electrons injected int…

Inside Gravitons This is a hypothesis which claims that the Graviton is a name and a placeholder, not for an autonomous particle, but for a mechanism which is the result of composite electrostatic forces between electric charges in particles and bodies. The diagram below shows two hydrogen atoms and illustrates the mechanism of dipole formation producing dipole gravity. The electrons orbiting the protons of the two hydrogen atoms have some freedom to deform their orbits depending on external influences. In the case of the two atoms below, each proton attracts the electron of the other atom while also repelling the proton of the other atom. …

Hello! Just would like to share an idea about measuring variables in the social sciences (especially in psychology) more efficiently. E.g. let's try to measure the extroversion trait in a group (or in the population). Today our method is to construct a survey, which tries to measure the various aspects of this characteristic numerically (e.g. with the help of 1-5 scales). Then we apply a numerical model to the results, and get a final value for the extroversion quality of each individual. The problem with this approach is, that the end result is too closely attached to the actual survey and numerical model, and it cannot be generalized easily. Furthermore …

Imagine a big bang that occurs forwards and backwards in time from the origin, much like the mirror universe model. Now let's suppose both halves expand normally until later when they reach a critical point for selection as a stable half universe. One of the 2 halves fails, it begins to collapse backwards to the origin and deflate. In doing so like a balloon deflating it expelled some of its contents back through the origin (forward in time relative to the survivor). This action directly causes inflation in the remaining more stable half universe, now the whole. Some or all of the properties of the physical laws of the failed universe are also combined with th…

The electron particle must have three electric charges! (A speculation from a layman) The energy of a “static” electron particle is equal: Ee = (-e) * (-e) / (4*pi*ε0* Re) =8.187104679*10^-14 joule …… II-1 “Re” is classic radius derived by Compton wave-length of electron. Am I wrong? My friend S… will say: Yes you are, I see only two electric charges in your formula. And “electron particle” has in fact only one electric charge. Let see the physic’s unity in my formula: Joule = C * C / m *F*m^-1 = C*C / C*(U*m)^-1 *m = C*C*C^-1*U*m /m= C*U The speculation consist: 1- The third electric charge…

According to you, in future, will be possible to change DNA in order to become for example smart as Einstein and good in football as Maradona. In general we could be able to program our genes like a software?

Einstein's "On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies" (https://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/) draws its conclusion based, at least in part, on Einstein's interpretation of simultaneity (generally, the point from which seemingly simultaneous events are observed dictates their perception, e.g., as simultaneous or "not simultaneous"). Einstein never explicitly defined simultaneity in this paper, but rather merely analogized to the arrival of a train when the hands of a clock were at a certain point. The problem that I see with this is the degree of imprecision implicit in this definition (e.g., when does "arrival" occur, how is the position of hands on a cl…

This is not a theory just a question, I was wondering about relative sizes. People often talk about what was before the Big Bang, Or what our universe is expanding into. if our universe was a virtual particle expanding into another universe just like a virtual particle that pops into existence into our universe, I was wondering how "entities" in this newly expanding universe would see the universe they were expanding into, while not realizing their universe was expanding into another universe. If from their view point a atom of "our hydrogen" was a star, how would they actually view "our" planet/stars/galaxies? what if this newly expanding universe was…

Just a question. I just seen Nobel awarded for neutrino oscillations. http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/2015/press.html Wondered how this effects the missing mass in universe(dark matter) If a neutrino is now thought to have a mass of a billionth of the mass of a proton, There are 100's trillions of neutrino's passing through us every second, 100 billion per square cm, Even at these levels there must then be the mass of 100 protons passing through every square cm, But the density of space is worked out at 1 hydrogen atom per cubic cm? . But if the weight for neutrino's is correct, every cubic cm of space would always have the mass o…

Pulled over from a thread in philosophy, where this is OT I disagree that Einstein though time was a substance or essence. He held that because c must be invariant for E&M to work, if one applies that concept to a kinematic system, one finds that time and distance have to be frame dependent. The ether was a purported medium that was the preferred reference frame. That defined where the laws of physics held, and was the frame from which you would e.g. measure the speed of light. But nobody has been able to measure our speed with respect to the ether. Or that any particular reference frame is the one where the laws work. I can't make heads or tails of the diagra…

Hello the author of the PDF document is preparing a specific paper for submission to the Quantum Physics and Nuclear Engineering 2016. So this is to post in speculation for now. Can you give your expert opinion? link http://patrick.vaudon.pagesperso-orange.fr/quantique.html Stéphane

Repeating it doesn't make that statement any less wrong, and it's spectacularly wrong.

An interesting observation about time is connected to an affect in photography called motion blur, as shown below. Motion blur occurs when the shutter speed is slower than the action speed. Since the photo stops time but conserves distance, the speed difference (d/t) shows up as uncertainty in distance; motion blur. Motion blur gives the mental impression of motion even though time is stopped in the photo. This suggests time is a potential that can convert to a potential in distance. This also suggests a time to distance potential conversion may well be the basis for Heisenberg Uncertainty. We can infer the momentum of the mouse but we can't fully determine its posit…

Hello, my name is Alex. Lets assume that we have a time machine. We are going in time from p.1 to p.2. There is nothing for us (who traveling) between 1 and 2. And here are the questions: If “World line” should be continuous and shouldn’t break then [0,1] should be changed also. So, can we know anything about the past where we came from? If we assume that the future is set and world just going his way. Can the time travel accident change the normal course of time and, for example, accelerate the evolution of live? It’s just some logical questions. Thank you for your time.

Currently the science estimates that the Sun is orbiting the galactic center in a vertical oscillation (Up, down) http://www.centauri-dreams.org/wp-co..._radiation.jpg Let's assume that this is correct. Now, please see the following presentation at pg 15 http://www.ifa.hawaii.edu/~barnes/ast110/MilkyWay.pdf There is an image of the galactic rotation random vectors in the nearby Solar Neighborhood. It is stated: "Most stars near the Sun have random velocities of a few tens of km/sec. These stars orbit the galactic center at ~230 km/sec." As it is random, each star can move to any direction. Therefore, we can assume that some of them are moving inwards to the galactic …

[math]\begin{tabular}{l*{6}{c}r} bosons (b) = integer spin & Bose-Einstein statistics \\ fermions (f) = half-integer spin & Fermi-Dirac statistics \\ \end{tabular}[/math] [math][/math] [math]\begin{tabular}{l*{6}{c}r} & identity & state & spin & ns & Ns & Nn \\ b & scalar & 0 & 0 & 1 & 1 & 1 \\ f & neutrino & +,- & 1/2 & 2 & 3 & 3 \\ b & photon & +,- & 1 & 2 & 1 & 2 \\ b & graviton & +,- & 2 & 2 & 1 & 2 \\ \end{tabular}[/math] Symbolic identity key: [math]n_s[/math] - spin states total number [math]N_s[/math] - species total number [math…

Recently I found a paper about new theory. It seems a kind of digital physics. The paper is located at this link http://figshare.com/articles/Nokton_theory/1549720 Is it a good candidate to be a theory of everything ?

I recently read a column in MaximumPC magazine by Tom Halfhill ( whose day job is as an analyst at Microprocessor Report and who I've read since Byte magazine in the 80s ) on the computer simulation of the whole universe. He had the rather naïve idea that since information is encoded as particle states in modern computers, and since just to encode all the information of a single particle would require a multitude of other particles, then by necessity a computer much larger than the whole universe is required to simulate the existing universe, But then he stated something which might make the simulation possible, and whichcaught my attention. In simulation games, lik…

Is there something that drives certain people to migrate to other places (some sort of epigenetic trigger) ? Why is it that less Caucasians prefer to work in warmer climes ? Why do some people take to a life at sea ? (inspite of obvious drawbacks).. Why do some people take to flying as a profession ? Please elucidate your viewpoint.

I realize that my previous discussion (debate) here has been closed: http://www.scienceforums.net/topic/91032-the-science-of-joy-and-happiness/ Therefore, you won't see me debating any longer since debating got us nowhere. I thought I could get somewhere with it. In other words, I thought that I could make my idea logically valid. But as it turns out, that does not seem to be the case. Therefore, this new topic I made gets things done the right way. That is, we are now going to talk about how I can test my idea. We are going to talk about science this time and no more debating. Overview Of My Theory To Be Tested (With New Points/Explanations) First …