Leaderboard

I don't think Einstein and Monroe ever met, either.

Post #49 here contains some great animations that I think are relevant: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/the-velocity-of-a-moving-frame-of-reference.972860/page-2

We look green with oval eyes, long legs and arms, wandering aimlessly in a sea of fiery bubbles.

Limitations in scientific skills and knowledge does not upset me at all, I might even be interested in attempting to fix that. Soapboxing in mainstream sections could be upsetting but moderators will fix that.

This seems like an off-topic response no matter what thread it's posted to.

Who does what?

Your post is clear. No apology required. God is mostly just an idea in our head. A part of ourselves we talk to when our actual self doesn’t feel like enough.

Babies' bottles have been sterilised with dilute hypochlorite for just over 100 years without any problems. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milton_sterilizing_fluid The hypochlorite isn't the problem. People cook chicken and that kills bacteria. The bacteria,are not the problem It's the shit. If you process the carcasses appropriately, you don't get them so badly contaminated that you have to bleach them (rather than just washing them). Chlorinated chicken is an excuse to literally sell shit to the consumer.

For someone who has previously accused others of insults and ironic answers, your reply seems pretty arrogant and reflective of your intentions of not listening beyond your own closed mind as evidenced in your quoted statement. Being someone who is totally bereft of the maths and actual inner workings of SR and GR, may I thank Strange, Swansont and particularly Ghideon with your excellent sketches and explanations that even I am beginning to understand.

QFT is based on relativity. If SR is wrong, QFT must be. Also, GPS can’t work, etc. It’s why we know your little fantasy is poppycock

There are websites that have this information. First stop should be a search engine.

..what eats human dead body (if it's not cremated)... ? microbes, worms etc in the soil in the grave etc etc.... Think.. It does not hurt.. ...only if you're simplifying process.. and not rethinking it truly well... ...I made this "trick" to catch you, John... to show the way you are "thinking"... or rather not thinking.. But it's Sunday late night, after hangover so, it does not count.. this time..

! Moderator Note It’s still off-topic, if you aren’t answering the question. You’re admitting that the circumstances don’t apply to you. The question was clearly addressed to people that believed, and then stopped. Posting to argue about it is off-topic as well.

Sorry that I overestimated your grasp of the material.

It is also unbelievable that you don't have an answer to my question. I'm still waiting ...

[7] Modern Physics; Second edition; Randy Harris; Chapter 2; Special Relativity; 2008 In the derivation of LT in [7], three special cases are used to determine the constants A, B, C, D. The result of this derivation gives the following: B = −Av, C = −Av/c2, D = A, A = γ. If you replace these values in LEx': x' = Ax + Bt LEt': t' = Cx +Dt you get LTx': x' = (x – vt)γ LTt': t' = (t – vx/c2)γ It is these two equations that are LT. But during the derivation, the combination LEt', SC1 is not used. Therefore, we make a verification of a solution (as one should always do). We calculate LTt' in SC1: LTt': t' = (t – vx/c2)γ SC1: x' = 0, x = vt → t' = (t-v(vt)/c2)γ → t' = t(1-v2/c2)γ → t'= t/γ My comment: In the derivation of LT in [7] is used LEx ', LEt', SC1, SC2, SC3 and as a result you get time dilation t' = tγ. But the verification of the derivation, LTt' with SC1 gives us t'= t/γ. This shows that the derivation of LT in [7] is not self-consistent! This is one of the reasons I said that SR is nonsense. I regret that everyone is upset by my conclusion but I have a lot more aspects of SR that I have analyzed in detail and everyone shows the same thing.