Speculations

Abstract: Both angular momentum and momentum are accepted to be conserved values and both of these are contained within the equation L = r x p. Assuming the implied rotation around a central point, they cannot both be conserved when the magnitude of the radius changes. The generally accepted principle is that momentum must change in order to conserve angular momentum. However it is logically proven that it is the component of momentum perpendicular to the radius which must be conserved. Introduction: Whilst working on a project which did not achieve the results predicted by physics, I stumbled upon this. Proof: For the equation L = r x p1. Assuming the implied rotation ar…

I apologize for my poor English. [ About the Solution of the Singularity Problem of Black Hole ] 1. Understanding of the problem : Generation of singularity Generally, stars are under gravitational contraction by their own gravity and it is known that if this is contracted within a certain radius (like Schwarzschild radius), it makes a black hole which even lights cannot escape from. Since gravity is generally an attractive force, gravitational contraction continues to exist in the black hole, too. Thus, in the central part of black hole exists an area with infinite density of energy, which point we call singularity. Such singularity denies application of the e…

Hello, I've recently been reading about an interesting alternative science theory called "Tetryonics". This post is about a specific prediction that the theory makes, it predicts that because matter is described as a standing wave then it should be able to be constructively/destructively interfered with allowing for "anti-matterless" annihilation through a phenomenon they call a "gravitational electromagnetic pinch" (GEM Pinch). If true this is obviously quite amazing since you could use this effect to create very efficient new sources of energy. I've even come across a detailed description as to how you would try to go about creating one and how it is supposed to wor…

Thermodynamics is pseudoscience in my opinion and those who believe in the second law of thermodynamics are liars. Life on earth violates the second law of thermodynamics and that's a fact. There was a guy from India named Arindam Banerjee who proved that both thermodynamics and Einstein's theory of relativity are pseudosciences.

No he tells us what the Universe will probably look like, based on past observational and present data, and extrapolating that forward...as these theories stand the test of time, they become "more certain" but never really proven, a word you seem preoccupied with. eg: Before the advent of the HST, scientists theorised that the probable formation of the solar system was caused by a cloud of gas and dust in space, that started to collapse.....With the HST, we have now seen this methodology in action in other distant solar systems.....so our theory has gained in certainty.....we are also pretty certain that the mechanism for stars is nuclear fusion, but we have not really …

SwansonT, And how exactly do you propose that Dr. Krauss show his model is valid? He figures that reality popped into existence from nothing out of the false vacuum in pairs of opposite energy, thus maintaining a zero energy situation (although some little tiny bit of energy had to be the seed, which invalidates the theory, theorectically) ? Suppose my model is that there must be conservation of space, and if space bulges out here it has to compress over there, and reality did not come into existence in one set of pairs but instead six sets of pairs (like the 12 sections of the sphere.) How do we decide which of us is correct? Which is the true thing? Which …

My advisors on Science Forum are right: Instead of just speculating, I should DO some physics thing and record what happens. I didn't have enough rope to to the rope wave thing, but, BEHOLD! here is this stick with builder's nylon twine wound on it. I measured off eleven meters of it, made loops ten meters apart, hung one end on a fence post and held the other end in my hand, hanging nearly to the ground. I even wrote a "null hypothesis": This lightweight stuff isn't going to make waves. It didn't. Not just loosly hanging like that. All it made was a parabola. So I took a step backward. The string made almost a straight line. But it made a wave. …

pdf file attached if you are interested in the proposed hypothesis, please contact me via e-mail ABSTRACT The proposal assumes that the distortion of space-time due to relative velocity (Special Relativity), and the distortion of space-time produced by gravitational fields (General Relativity) are linked to changes of state that affect to mass-energy. The hypothesis proposes the existence of a process linked to gravity, this phenomenon would affect mass-energy. It would be required to add an additional condition (being a more restrictive scenario) keeping the field equations that define space-time curvature, but by adding the condition linked to the proposed p…

I have heard that the average person has only 1-4% neanderthal DNA. If someone has 4% neanderthal DNA in their genes, can they increase their children's percentage by mating with another person of opposite gender who has 4% neanderthal DNA as well? If the son, daughter etc. have 8% neanderthal DNA can it be increased further by mating them with someone who also has a high neanderthal percentage? If not, can you please explain why the neanderthal DNA in modern humans can only get to 4% at most and not climb any higher? Why is this the limit (If it is)? Do you think the neanderthal will be able to be brought back to life in future?

A model is proposed that explains LENR in nanocrystals. We should expect "flares" of the neutron yield (or, more accurately, the reaction events) in a certain narrow temperature range, the evaluation is performed in the work. The experiment is to heat the powder and slowly cool, while keeping track of the "flashes". Please criticize. guron_lenr_eng.pdf

Throughout history innovative thinkers have had to contend with tides of herd prejudice. Even mythology is replete with such creative intellects, and sometimes, discoveries will change mythology to history + symbolic embellishments, like the story of Troy. Examples of both types include Moses (the Ten Commandments), Jesus (Yeshua ben Yoseph, Sermon on the Mount), Origen Adamantius (Biblical eschatology, many writers today believe that Origen and Origenism were anathematised by the Roman Catholic Church, but an equal number deny this), Martin Luther (triggered the reformation revealing the true teachings of the Bible, hitherto in Latin), Galileo Galilei (challenged Geocent…

Sorry to bother you. Am I correct in thinking that electrons and positrons which are fermions (leptons) when they annihilate each other produce bosons (gamma rays). Am I correct in thinking both Bosons and Fermions have spin and inertia. Is it possible that both Bosons and fermions are made from the same undetectable substance, which makes up space (strings). If a fundamental particle had no spin it would be undetectable. If it could be made to spin in one way or another it would then be detectable and become a boson or fermion. If the undetectable substance was being influenced by the movement of all the other fermions and bosons spinning around it, i…

If you know source reason why Newton's third law of motion works, then you can manipulate that source diagram to figure out how to stop motion of one body of equal mass. But theory needs proof. So instead of theory, I am directly posting link of my youtube video. <Link removed> You can watch other videos also posted on the same channel. Please tell me what mistake I am doing.

Hello, I think I have experimentally found a weak link between electricity and gravity look at url deleted I want to discuss all your comments and questions on the Forum. Willy Guns

A message can be send from present to pass and pass to present > but !~ never from future to pas _ or pass to future ; the future do not belong to ''time frame'' it's a mere vision of the mind ''only'' _.it does not possess any entity of motion....cause !~matter, is not present .

How can one prove it ?

For clarification using the Gullstrand-Painlevé coordinates. Which can be interpreted as space flowing towards a mass. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gullstrand–Painlevé_coordinates Is Gravitational attraction simply the contraction of space around a mass? Could this also be worded as gravity is caused by the absorption of space by mass? Whilst Gravitational repulsion is the expansion of space between masses or galaxies? Worse still, Could space be regarded as being made up of gravitons, or little strings?

I wonder why our scientists do whatever it takes to support the BBT. What is so Unique in the BBT? What makes it different from many other theories? Why our scientists always try to adapt the BBT to new discoveries, while they do not stop even for just one moment and ask themselves if this theory is incorrect? Just few obstacles of the BBT: 1. Size/Quantity - After the inflation (10-32) the size of the early Universe was about 10 cm (as grapefruit) and it includes particles which could fit info 375 billion trillion galaxies. Is it feasible? How can a natural force create this huge amount of particles in just a fraction of a second? 2. Speed - At the end of…

So many times in past centuries has there been condemnation of theories that turned out to be true. Cosmology, medical knowledge etc. People from Einstein to Edison say to ignore skeptics and persist in your work. If you wrestle with pigs you get dirty. Kind of like debating something with Don Trump. Why bother. Why ask the air force if there is such a thing as flying saucers. Lesser minds lacking objectivity and who aren't worth bothering with get caught up in ego battles- not on searching for merit in a thing but in trying to resolve offended personal beliefs. If we don't ignore authority then maybe we're all dummies.

I just always assumed that's what they were. As you look out at the Universe at large, eventually you come to a place that we are unable to see beyond. A resonant block. This is not only the farthest out we can see, not only the furthest back we can peer, but also the "smallest" form of the expanding Universe... but at that far out, the sphere of view has the largest area? So if you were the "Big Bang" what do you think your little singularity of creation would look as the view of it became the most inflated perception of the entire Universe we are capable of perceiving.... I always thought it was understood it might look something like a quasar... and they'd probably be …

I have alway wonder what constitute the full function of a source of light and why space allow light to travel so fast My g but my main question is <<Is light energy ? transferable to a ''target solar panel'' let say at 15 degrees to the reflection of a mirror at the same distance to the source but not in line with it . at 15 degrees (Paralax)

Gravity F~ can move and displace matter,,,energy cannot.

Again, this is not a theory. (I don't even have a theory on how to tie my shoes.) It is not a hypothesis. I looked it up so I'd know how to spell it, and found out this ain't one. It is a mere S.W.E.G. (Scientific Wild-Eyed Guess -- only somewhat above guessing which side up a coin will fall.) It is plainly established that the galaxies are moving apart. And that the farther apart they are, the faster they are moving. (Or, maybe there is a cause-and-effect here: The faster they go, the farther they have already gone?) The question to be addressed is WHAT MAKES 'EM GO LIKE THAT? PLAN A: They hate each other even more than they attract each other…

The "practice" and "science" is bunk due to the following reasons: - Mental illness doesn't exist. - Psychiatrists don't comprehend modern society. They seem to think the paragon of mental health is the homely 1950s. - Psychiatrists enter the profession to control people, in addition to regulating their patients', thoughts, values, beliefs and even hobbies. They want to remove the tenet of not intefering in patients' lives beyond the interests of good health. - Psychiatrists seem to believe that only "the select" warrant good or ethical treatment, whilst most others should just suck it up. In this case, why can't psychiatry be banned?

a. Can one object be at 2 different points of space ? The answer is Yes it can, but not at the same time. Meaning that the same object A can be at point 1 at time stamp T1 and at point 2 at time stamp 2. It cannot be at 2 different points 1 & 2 at the same time. That was for Space. Now the new question: b. Can an object be at 2 different points of time ? The answer is Yes it can. But not at the same time The underlined condition looks like a tautology. Of course an object cannot be at 2 different points of Time "at the same time". Which means that IF an object is at time stamp T1, it cannot be "at the same time" at time stamp T2. Or, …