Speculations

The main idea of new theory of time-space is that time is a expression of change in motion distance and curvature. In a word, time is equivalent to space, and vice versa. According this new theory of time-space, there are three kinds of clock. Those are current clock, thing clock and Doppler clock. Every clock has its own second unit. Time-space is moving. Active and passive motion of time-space form a whole world of physics. The new theory gives us a definite answer to what the nature of wave, light,gravity,energy,passive inertia, active inertia, electricity, magnetism, special and general Doppler principle is. Reference:THING AND ITS LAW (ISBN 1-58…

Medical science could give you eternal youth with a pill whould you take it and why I would not take it, i want to die not because i hate life just so i can be newagain.

Light wave is a effect of the vabration of atom's sphere time-space determined by the double-focus principle. Light wave is a serial time-space spherical wave. light wave carries curvature and kinetic energy, but not mass.Suppossition that light wave transfers a equivalent mass is wrong. So, the mass-energy formula created by Einstein is also wrong. Energy is equivalent to the change in the curvature of time-space. Reference: THING AND ITS LAW ( ISBN 1-58939-525-5), chapter 2,5, published by Virtualbookworm.com publishing.Inc.

Just some stuff I've been pondering. My understanding of the big bang is a nearly infinite amount of energy was injected into our empty universe through a near infinitely small point. Through tests today this energy has indications it can effect our universe at speeds faster than light and seems to have the ability to store massive amounts of data relative to time. If I had these properties to work with to build a universe I would keep it simple and never let the initial big bang "particle" expand but have it just stay small and fast. If it travelled our present universe touching every point over and over at near infinite speed following a repeating incremental patt…

Ok, here's a story. I travel back in time with a wireless camera hooked up to me. My friend is monitoring me with the camera from a computer. I go back 20 minutes to the past to San Francisco, a 20 minute walk from my house. a) What would the camera see? b) Would the camera even work? c) Can you even go back in time? d) Would time be skewed?

people babble how bible is not real, it is,except no god, just aliens visiting earth in ancient times, i'l prove this later. So heres the arc its been found in 60s researched in 80s carbon dated and analyzed, officially declared as the arc of noah. How did you not know of this ? this information was supressed in great many countries especially u.s. for reasons of controversey panic etc. How did it happen, GOD ? no, the aliens warned noah of upcoming poleshift which happend 3600 years. (nope not the great asteroid, this happend couple thousand years ago] You still think it's a hoax, nope it's there you can go and analyze it yourself if they let you, …

Is there gravity in the process of falling body? The answer is not. Galileo demonstrated that the acceleration of falling body is not concerned with mass, volume and chemical elements. This is Galileo phenomenon. Newton and Einstein attempted to use their theory, gravity law or general relativity to explain Galileo phenomenon, but it is not perfect. All physics know this. All physics also know that many phenomena can not clarified by Newton’s gravity law. For example, Newton’s law of gravity can only perfectly explain why tides occur on the side nearest to it, but not on the other side. In fact, there is not necessary relation between the phenomenon of fal…

The formation of wave is determined by The double-focus principle. In the spherical time-space, there are two focuses according to the duality principle of curvature. One is real focus caused by contraction motion of time-space. A nother is virtual focus decided by expansion motion of time-space. Two focuses overlap and interplay each other, which causes a serial vabration of time-space. So, wave is born by it. This is just theSo-called double-focus principle. Reference:THING AND ITS LAW (ISBN 1-58939-525-5), chapter 2: timedistance and timecurvature (the active and passive motion of time-space) and chapter 5: natural force(the durality of time-space and ene…

I have posted my example of how I would portray gravity. Here's a link. http://www.scienceforums.net/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=3164 It's very probably right, but I can't prove it.

When someone thinks of a solution that works with what they already know, does it cause it to be true? Does thought shape the universe? Or is this just a stupid idea :bs: ? What do you think?

http://www.scienceforums.net/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=90 VS http://www.scienceforums.net/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=3173

Just had to share this hilarious paradigm of pseudoscience with everyone: http://www.alexchiu.com/

Bored of the usual flat space picture? Well I am. This is how I believe that gravity works. We live in a liquid of strings...How hard to imagine? Well it is hard to imagine. My liquid is not visible, but its forces are creating gravity. It vibrates causing radiation in all directions. The peaks of this radiation push atoms outwards away from the peaks like surfers. The atoms gather together where the vibrations lessen. The atoms then pinch the liquid string like a finger pressed against a guitar string. Our planet is wrapped around the strings like a pearl, and it is trapping the vibrations, and stopping them. This causes things to gather here. Photons travel through the …

Since we can record brain activity with EEG and some day hope to interpret thoughts by specific patterns then it seems there is an external effect to thought electrically. All EM effects should be eternal since they are broadcast into space at light speed. Shouldn't some kind of encrypted form of every thought then be broadcast into space? Just aman

If we evolved from a mucky soup some "billions" of years ago, and have since then continuted to evolve into homo sapien sapien, then why have they found skeleton remains of humans over 11' tall. Isn't this a little contradicting to the "theory" that we once were smaller, but now getting bigger? Also Evolution would have us believe that the earth has been here for "billions" of years. Do some research and find out how far the moon moves from the earth each year. Now that you have that figure, back the moon up and see just where it puts the moon in relation to the earth. Interesting. God Bless

While chatting innocently online (proud geeks like me do that often), I got this weird message: (21:31:51) —› fark.com: NASA doesn't want you to know about the alien skulls they've discovered on Mars (21:31:51) —› url: http://www.weeklyworldnews.com/news/index.cfm?instanceid=60632 NOW. I know that tabloids rarely contain ANY kind of material that isn't completely BS *but* I also heard that any rumor has a tiny grain of truth. Not saying this si true (its one of the funniest things i've ever seen though, no doubt) I still would like to know if any of you knows what is the grain of truth in this one - or in other words, what is this article basing it's st…

This is cool, check out the vid. http://www.thebostonchannel.com/news/2780356/detail.html?treets=bos&tml=bos_7am&ts=T&tmi=bos_7am_1_06000101212004

I was sitting down the other day, lazing in front of the tv when an Olay advert comes on and starts talking about "amino-peptide complexes" Now my knowledge of chemistry is purely A-level standard so maybe I've yet to learn a certain section of chemistry but if I recall correctly a peptide link is formed when two amino acids are condensed together! Now as a single amino acid, I could imagine it forming a zwitterion and becoming a dipole sufficient to form a ligand with a transition metal, but is it still even possible for a polypeptide to become a ligand? From my knowledge of chemistry so far it would appear claims of "amino-peptide complexes" are contradictory in at …

in the production of electricity between the fields is another field, were the electrons pass thru and become neither positive or negative they are neutral, the device we need is one that can measure the exact frequancy of the neutral field, does one exist or does anyone know if its possible to measure this field if so i would like to know if its possible to measure the EXACT int he millionths of degree's in exactness, is there anybody out there with knowledge of this field, if so please help me.

What do you think of this? Nutty guy!

i was just wondering where do scientist and other researchers get their ideas and inspirations from. when i mean inspiration ...its like a spark of idea ...... i read that there might be a higher consciousness at work . what do u think ...............is there a so called higher consciousness at work .?

Isn't it interesting how Face "skeptics," in their simplistic yet smug way, magically transform into psychologists when dealing with the artificiality issue? Espousing the "seeing faces in the clouds" explanation for the Face's 98% symmetry, wholly non-fractal (non-random) nature, and exquisite "facial" detail, has become the norm ever since astronomer-cum-psychologist Carl Sagan made it chic to do so early in the game. The fact is, before the MGS imagery came in, the Artificiality Hypothesis made specific predictions--the hallmark of the scientific method--that finer facial details would appear in high resolution images. Not things like "nose hairs" or "pimples" or …

Thought I'd give this pseudoscience thingy a try. "Based on a complete lack of evidence to the contrary, I believe that the Nasca lines were built by giant squid for no apparent reason, and that the current proliferation of squid in our seas is incontravertible PROOF that they are coming back to do more of whatever it was they did. I have calculations but they're in mindSpeak__™ And the dog stole my research notes. But I know the reason I can't be wrong, so don't worry about that."

here`s an Idea I`ve been boucing around in my head for some time. "when it ALL ends" if you gather all the elctrons and put them into a pile and the same with neutron, protons, photons etc... all in their neat little piles and then try to make the most inert unreactive, non radioactive material you can think off and scatter it asunder throughout the space the universe ocupies, what can stop it being gravitationaly pulled back in again and blowing up? using the conservation of energy and matter theories, is it actualy possible that the "Universe" as we know it and all the particles within it will NEVER cease? the though reminded me a little from the "perpetual mo…

The asteroid that supposedly killed the dinosaurs did not actually hit the earth - it passed within a few meters of the surface and was pulled around the earth in a gravity slingshot type motion. On its way the null-G field created by the lack of spin between the asteroid and the earth pulled the dinosaurs off the planet and they were carried off into space with it. The asteroid finally landed on Nibiru - the 10th planet, where the Dinosaurs and the Ancients have enjoyed a long and fruitful joint exisitence, frolicking and gambolling through the long cold nights. In 2003 Nibiru will swing by Earth, and the dinosaurs will return by space taxi at the point where…