Jump to content

Deckard

Members
  • Posts

    26
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://

Retained

  • Quark

Deckard's Achievements

Quark

Quark (2/13)

10

Reputation

  1. my father is currently looking up the correct "term" for it but for now we just call it neutral field "for now" till we find the exact meaning
  2. they can be ordinary magnets either way there is a neutral field
  3. well my father knows there is a field between 2 opposing electromagnets which is the barrier which keeps the 2 electromagnets from getting any closer to eachother there is a barrier between the 2 which is blocking them from touching completely which i know it must exist i will get some example's for you when i find the write ones
  4. all i really wanted to know is how to measure the neutral field between 2 electromagnets and find out the exact frequancy it resonates at
  5. sorry i closed the explorer halfway thru the upload
  6. sorry if i offended u yt2095 i had no intention of that, and there is no need to be calling me a chump.....
  7. i'll just be quite untill my father returns lol *scratches head*
  8. if u payed a lil more attention i said magnets but lets say electro magnets too
  9. but really i would just like to know how to measure the neutral field and get the exact frequancy it resonates at.
  10. i'll be explaining how that will be done when my father returns from work tommorow
  11. ok untill tommorow here is a teaser (sorry cant help myself) think about this using a crystal that resonates at the same frequancy that the neutral field resonates at to amplify that neutral field and create a "neutral magnetic field" *start ur thinking"
  12. ok, i cant wait till tommorow so me and my father can get this down properly i'me sure it will give your noodels something to think about
  13. well the tree in the forest is just stupid becuase if that is correct then the universe outside our solar system only came into existence when we started using telescopes to look out and the stars only exist becuase we look at them and when u think about it, the real experiment was about light, without light there is no object to reflect the light therefore the object doesnt exist if u cant see it type stuff, if i am wrong please correct me becuase without light nothing would exist as you cant see it? i say that schrowhoever was just interested in gambling on the results of his tests or he didnt like his cat/cats eitherway its pure stupidity to think this its just like saying "if i close my eyes you dont exist" but if i were to punch you when your eyes are closed and there are no witnesses you dam well feel the punch.
  14. hehe i aint stressing and i dont need to chill i am cool as a cucumber (are they cool? lol)
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.