Jump to content

Radical Edward

Senior Members
  • Content Count

    2055
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

204 Beacon of Hope

About Radical Edward

  • Rank
    Primate
  • Birthday 06/10/1978

Profile Information

  • Location
    The Meme Pool
  • Interests
    What are they?

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. ok that's great, thanks. I thought it would be down to something like that.
  2. well a mathematician wouldn't use the word axiom to put it another way, Special Relativity is simply Galilean relativity (or invariance) reformulated to include Maxwell's Equations, and General Relativity includes the equivalence principle.
  3. on thing worth mentioning here is that you see a red beam of light moving away from your rocket, whereas someone on the ground sees a blue beam of light (or something blue shifted anyway, depending on how fast you're going and what you emit) essentially the speed of light is 1/sqrt(mu*epsilon) which are invariant of the speed of the observer. everything else just falls out of that.
  4. it's not hard. You do need to start off with the axiom that the speed of light in a vacuum is the same for all observers though. Some people struggle with that bit.
  5. I'm really not working in this area at all, so my thoughts might be right off, and if there is good reason, I'm quite happy to abandon this line of enquiry... anyway, on to my issue with gravitons. Firstly, by the equivalence principle if we imagine ourselves in a box which is being accelerated, we cannot tell whether it is being accelerated at 1g towards a planet which is below us, or accelerated at 1g by a rocket moving upwards (relative to the box) in free space - both cases in an otherwise empty universe. in my box I have a hypothetical 'graviton detector' which is good enough to detect gravitons from a planet (in reality no such thing could exist, because you'd need a detector the size of jupiter orbiting a neutron star for 10 years just to make a single measurement) now if we consider gravitons being emitted from the planet towards the box, we have lots of sources - a whole planet's worth. but if we consider the empty universe with a box on a rocket, then there is no source. so what is the source? when we consider other force carriers, like photons, they are emitted from a source (accelerating electron/proton or something like that), but with the graviton it is not so trivial. Both of these cases should result in an ideal detector as mentioned above detecting the same number of gravitons, but where are they coming from? First thoughts are something related to the curvature of space itself but it's not clear where to go with that.
  6. yep. The antiknot springs to mind. It is impossible to tie an antiknot.
  7. Rather we quantify time based on oscillations because it is convenient. Another, perfectly valid oscillationless and far more fundamental definition of a unit of time is that of the planck time; the amount of time required for light to travel a planck length. We can use that as the unit length on a time ruler.
  8. He's referring to the interpretation put forth by Feynman.
  9. I'd say No ,the goldfish is not in heaven unless it accepted Jesus Christ. If it didn't It, it will be in hell, burning, forever. Best to traumatize kids early on about how horrible Christianity is.
  10. Wow, it's almost a decade since I started this thread. It's nice to see it is still going.
  11. Hi there. To be honest I wouldn't worry too much about science education prior to 18 years old. Being blunt, most high school curricula are crap. If there are any particular areas of science that you are interested in, then look up university books, or increasingly commonly, online university courses like those that can be found on iTunes. The Khan academy is also an excellent resource for quite a few things. Don't forget of course getting involved in places like here!
  12. Well it is a bit unusual - as we're using OLEDs, devices from different areas of the glass substrate have slightly different thicknesses and operate at different voltages, however the current which flows at a given brightness is always the same. Hence if we have a fixed voltage supply of say 3V, then all the devices will be a different brightness, but if we have a fixed current supply of 0.2mA, then they will all have the same brightness. That's the reason that I am using the circuit above. The problem is that sometimes I want to run a load of devices at 0.2mA and other times 0.3mA and so on, and trimming every device manually would be an utter pain.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.