Trash Can

That is so very True our SMBH in the milky Way Sgr A does have much Iron "Blue part" around it a Iron Nebula about 5 by 5 ly of it on cross section.

Which can all be explained away by gravitons shifting between membranes from other universes to ours and vice versa in that link, which the CMB cold spot is not evidence but suggest that we may have touched another universe membrane and exchanged heat with a universe was near thermal death or closer than ours so we lost it, heat that is. CMB Cold spot

Well that paper describes what is called false singularities and not true singularities. So again its up to you, that was your best chance as the model is specifically designed for atoms in a solid. Guess your on your own to choose a mathematical methodology that you can agree on. Till then I can't help you further. Hence why I asked in advance. Its your model its up to you to choose a methodology so I can help you rather than guessing which method you want just so you can repeatedly accuse me of trying to sidelight. Just as you did on both the fractal and the Cellular automata models when I described how they work. I will not make a single choice for…

Oh, I agree it is happening on the Planck Scale, which is why I wanted to see what that "Toy Model" said on the Planck Scale.

Is it a fact that there would be ZERO procreation if homosexuality were any benchmark of normal sexuality? If so, that says it all. Sex's primary purpose is procreation and pleasure between a husband and wife.

hey strange hi; I am blue89 , I cannot reach you via personal message. would you like to apply patents together?? let me know if it is possible. (Note: I am sorry I could not find any way except here to express the statement) Regards

Infinite & ageless could most certainly describe the universe. & that's only between 2 & 3 out of 5 dimensions in my theory, & that's just the amount of baryonic matter above the planck length. There's an horizon we can't see beyond. I explain why that is in my theory which I still don't think you've read. I think you were plugging in for interactions partially beneath the planck length though, in the subplanckian particles of a particle-wave. Or at least where the gravity experiences lorentz transformations. There's infinite interactions occurring between any two points of space in this model, it's just a matter of how minuscule & quick they occu…

These are simply the facts; Dr. Hawass has said he believes the heat is caused by the fact that one of these "stones" is actually a concrete repair. I'm fully aware this statement is illogical and not consistent with known science to my knowledge. http://english.ahram.org.eg/NewsContent/9/40/280853/Heritage/Ancient-Egypt/Void-within-Great-Pyramid-of-Giza-not-a-new-discov.aspx The fact that an ancient path built before the pyramids leads directly to this point is irrelevant to the fact that these recessed stones back out of the sunlight are in actuality warmer than the surrounding stones in the sunlight. Dr Hawass put out a call for Egyptologists to come up …

bh just sounds like butthole look big writing medium writing Tiny writing

The ENERGY with which the most subtle (sub-atomic) particles of matter (mass) are bound with each other >IS DIVINE< !!! The individual separation or merger of these particles is absolutely precise and cannot !!! be altered by anyone ! ~Any separation or merger would mean "non-existence of creation"~that ENERGY IS GOD !

Inspiration to below experiment was EPAR UK TV ( Reuters agency ) THREE MASS TEST ( First step to learn You New Problem) Dynamite and table . Mass M must be ! biger than m ! After explosion red mass will hit blue and stop later blue will hit white and stop ( please study what is doing rope - ( F=mV*V / R )) FINAL EXPERIMENT NOW YOU ARE READY TO YOUR OWN WORK BELOW MORE SIMPLE SITUATION 3mV = 2 mV ??? EPAR ? it is VERY VERY SPECIAL PENDULUM We Are able full control vibration's time after collision CAN WE DO THIS OR NOT ?

I won't be permitted to reply--an assent, FYI--to the resultant warning. As you were...(you all)

Hello. This may sound daft but hear me out, our planet.... our home.... is one big lie. Looks can be deceiving.... below you is the greatest lie, right under your feet the whole time. This lie that will soon take the title in history as “The deceit on all of man-kind”. Your home, my home, our home.... what’s that? Earth.. of course. What’s this all about? It’s about how the way we perceive the world has been manipulated, so what’s the gain from such a lie? Money, power and control. Our place in the universe is more important than you think. Humans... so intelligent, conscious and inovative. We are more than little specs on a ball spinning around a ball the…

Yes . According to my observation from a working model; it is only possible under one condition ,,,and that is < the opposite force must generate it's own acceleration; witch leads to + 2 minus negative 1 = one half of the total force generated by the systeme ,,and further more +2+3+4+5~minus negative 1 to infinity is possible, but not practical. the answers to questions from you all might be difficult for any one to comprehend. sorry about that .

And event can be created , negatively 1, and responded at positively 2 ~so time is not the same witch lead to continuous medium.= expansion

And event can be created , negatively 1, and responded at positively 2 ~so time is not the same witch lead to continuous medium.= expansion

There are some who think that life origin of life on Earth, sprung from within Earth. Here is one (most recent) from Naked Earth (subtitle: The New Geophysics), by Shawna Vogel, pages 179-180: . . I'm agnostic with respect to this theory and all others. I have thought, prior to reading this book, that one possibility is that life pervades the Universe and it is quite "cheap."

the mechanism of quantum entanglement is simple. the force between any 2 charged particles f=Ke x qp/rr is the carrier of energy/information/moving electric force. it is an invisible physical rod with zero mass that always connected 2 particles as 1. if 1 particle is energized, that energy instantly transferred to another. from f=ma, m=0, so energy instantly moved from 1 particle to another. we call it QE.

I think it's a very good question. I think I might consider answering for several areas or subjects.

No analysis whatsoever. Are you a troll and a bullshitter, or only a troll. Do you understand about EEG?

I don't think real empirical-based science can ever be reconciled with any mainstream religion besides perhaps Buddhism to some extent, which isn't actually a religion but a philosophy of life. The reason I believe this is because people who are religious and hold to religious tenets do so based on faith and belief and not logic and facts. When an idea conflicts with their religious dogma they automatically discount it without having to understand the idea. Unfortunately, modern science itself has become a religion based on the non-belief in an intelligent sentient creator or intelligent design of the universe, in other words atheism. Because of this ll kin…

does the unruh effect have any bearing on the question of a detectable flux? If the flux is composed of virtual particles, they wouldn't live long enough to offer a "velocity signal" to a static detector. But if the detector was of a relativistic velocity, doesn't the unruh effect come into play at that point as it intersects the quantum foam of space?

The holy shroud is false. The true face of Mary and Jesus. [url=https://imgur.com/smj46e9][/url]

Ask yourself, is "God" energy?

"God is the Supreme Intelligence-First Cause of all things." God is eternal. If He had a beginning, He must either have sprung from nothing, or have been created by some being anterior to Himself. It Is thus mat, step by step, we arrive at the idea of infinity and eternity. God is unchangeable. If He were subject to change, the laws which rule the universe would have no stability. God is immaterial, that is to say, that His nature differs from every-thing that we call matter, or otherwise. He would not be unchangeable, for He would be subject to the transformations of matter. God is unique. If there were several Gods, there would be neither unity of plan nor un…