# SuperPolymath

Senior Members

165

-6 Poor

• Rank
Baryon

## Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

1. ## What is uncertainty ?

You can, actually.
2. ## Off-topic hijack (from What is uncertainty ?)

Take QM mechanics, an excellent cover-up theory that diverts a community from classified knowledge.
3. ## What is uncertainty ?

In one sense, a myth is an idea that, while widely believed, is false, failing to correspond with reality. In a deeper sense, which is employed by students of religion, a myth serves as an orienting and mobilizing story for a people, a story that reminds them who they are and why they do what they do. When a story is called as a myth in this sense—which we can call Myth with a capital M—the focus is not on the story's relation to reality but on its function. This orienting and mobilizing function is possible, moreover, only because Myths with a capital M have religious overtones. Such a Myth is a Sacred Story.
4. ## Hijack (from Ether evidence?)

GR states that matter tells spacetime how to curve & this curve (gravity) propagates at C for that level of reality (1.6x10^-35 meters through 13 billion light years) & tells matter how to move via SR, there are infinite smaller levels composing an infinite larger levels, that is a governing property & generating property Vmedvil, but it's all deterministic because it's all (including SR) governed by GR, Vmedvil. In either case @swansont was incorrect. This wouldn't be modeled from scratch.
5. ## Hijack (from Ether evidence?)

All gravity has motion. It's called frame-dragging.
6. ## Hijack (from Ether evidence?)

Everything is still dictated by motion under GR.
7. ## Hijack (from Ether evidence?)

It's not from scratch, you have everything up to GR, pre-QM.
8. ## Hijack (from Ether evidence?)

It was an attempt to work with a user who had the necessary education to help me model-build, & I never once asked you to lock it. I said move it to trash can before resorting to locking it entirely, at least from there it could be moved back into speculations in the event a model would arise from the concepts.
9. ## Hijack (from Ether evidence?)

I was going to attempt to work with @Mordred on this but you locked said topic. So I sent him a pm on the subject in question. If he takes on the project I will attempt to do so, then I will post the topic.
10. ## Ether evidence?

The luminiferous Ether was Newton's vision of the ether, not Einstein's "Detector a reads 1 when a particle has horizontal polarity. Dectector B reads 1 when a particle has vertical polarity. If the particles are entangled previously this will affect the statistical average. Superposition is a mixture of the two. Statistically it can only be one or the other. However you don't know which photon has which. " You wanna know why? Because QM uses probability statistics & makes no attempt to understand the underlying nature of it all. The science of it, which could be expressed classically i.e. with nothing but local information exchange, can't be perfectly understood with QM & therefore the predictions are actually less accurate than otherwise possible. That's just what you get with an indeterminate methodology.
11. ## Ether evidence?

Never once do I mention Isaac Newton. His idea of the ether is far too outdated. Einstein's is based on matter telling spacetime how to reshape & spacetime telling matter how to move. My bad, yes I meant "On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies." They're neither, they're based on Bell's inequality (math). They may be used to test any theory in physics.