Trash Can

A lot of minerals are sort of dangerous to use for healing processes. For instance, if you have a broken arm, you wouldn't want to put dangerous minerals near it while it's healing. Magnetic minerals might disturb the healing process by forcing the soul out of the limb, and chalcanthite or something similar might disturb the bodies natural copper stores. My question is: are there any good minerals that can be used to accentuate the bodies natural healing process? If so, are any of these easily accessible?

How, well some 5 or so billion years ago, the primordial Earth had no climate, it went from a ball of gas and dust to a lifeless solidifying mass with no atmosphere. However (tell Al Gore) volcanoes began spewing gasses and gradually a climate emerged. Thus climate change is older than the Earths climate. 20,000 years ago half of NJ and everything above that was under thousands of feet of ice. Since this mostly melted by 10,000 years ago, the current rate of melt is well, babyshit. So climate change is very real, and totally normal, and there is no change in the last 150 years that comes anywhere the last 20,000 years. Which is why the pedophile from Penn State …

CRISPR allows things like adding or removing bits of DNA from a living creature, so would it make sense that CRISPR could help humanity achieve enlightenment? I've personally only managed to activate up to my solar plexus chakra, but have met with no success trying to open my heart chakra. Other methods of activating my chakras, such as meditation, magnetic compression, and electric stimulation, have failed, so I've been trying to find a way to do it that actually works. Any ideas would be very helpful, thanks!

And this is precisely why, in a place like this, any thread challenging evolutionary orthodoxy -- as I've learned from personal experience myself -- is invariably an exercise in futility. The OP is not asking you to rehearse established dogma; he is asking you to question the presuppositions which underwrite that dogma. He's asking you to think for yourselves. And that's just what no one here has shown any willingness to do. Our chapel is sound, thank you very much. Consider yourself hoping -- somewhat quixotically -- to take a poke at established dogma on a Moslem website, for instance. Your suspicion is that the site members have never challenged the assumptio…

Who is we, are there two more stooges? Where did you learn thee words of wisdom and from where did they get the info? I could make stuff up too, except I am a grown up How can the expanded material be the entire universe when that material is moving outward at a high rate of speed. Are you claiming that it goes nowhere, or that where it goes did not exist until the matter got there. My hope is that you learn that you can not make up stories as you go and be taken seriously That said Tyson makes up krap every day as well, Hawking wrote entire books of nonsense

He was just correcting the grammar in beecee’s post, not trying to give an authoritative version of the original. But I’m sure everyone appreciates your work in that respect. That is true for simple things. And (as the original was about physics) I think it would be fairly easy to explain, say, Newton’s laws to almost anyone. The basic concepts of more complex ideas can be explained in simple terms. But you soon run into the problem that people will only have a limited understanding. In the case of GR or the Higgs mechanism, their understanding will probably based on analogies of limited accuracy. This isn’t normally a problem. Except when people thin…

Multiplication x 184.000 for any incident radiation: https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/bd/0c/4b/12c71804360dbd/US5252176.pdf

I want to know how I can turn my right arm into a whip with DNA manipulation. Of course on a technical level. Does this genetic manipulation needs to be applied to the entire body or just the arm? Does the crispr I choose to take target a specific cell, for instance, the arm cell. Should I choose metamorphosis by manipulating every DNA in the body?

Hi

Your questions about space are a good start. Many scientists today don't like philosophy but is what is needed more now than ever if it is to progress beyond the limits of institutional authoritarianism. It is also needed if one is to internalize what you learn rather than restricting it to the 'faith' in those claiming authority wherever they exist. Space is hard to define without reference to what 'matters' to us humans. This has lead those supporting the strict 'empirical' approach to refraining from definitions that cannot be shared by the senses. Given we seem to not notice space directly without other matter as a reference, many prefer to ignore speculating upo…

The phrase "conspiracy theory" is widely used as mockery. But of course, lots of conspiracies DO happen, and then they become history. Like the Bay of Pigs invasion of Cuba was going to be portrayed as a glorious liberation, and the multiple attempts by the CIA to kill Castro would have been a 'popular uprising'. Or the famous weapons of mass destruction. Then there's the Watergate episode. If they had succeeded, anybody making an allegation would have been labelled a "conspiracy theorist" and mocked. But they were all true, and they happened. So if you think that you know of a TRUE one, list it here, and give your reasoning. Of course, if one gives rise…

.

Enzymes are bio-catalyzers like proteins that allow a great number of biological reactions take place at a rate much fast than in its absence. The molecules show high attentiveness for the recognition of the substances. It is to be transformed and they are evolved for thousands of years to make possible a wide variety of transformations related to all forms of life and In this line, a primitive wave of enzyme engineering was developed as a way to use enzymes in industrial processes. One of the first fields was the food industry, Microbial, and plant enzymes, such hydrolases or pectinases were used in food preparation, such as bread, beer, milk derivatives or juice prepara…

I suggest you stop making one ridiculous claim after another, and then balk at putting your money where your mouth is when challenged. As for, "Again scientific theories are never meant to find any supposed truth or reality" -- you Evidently, Steven Weinberg -- and countless others besides -- does not share your opinion. Haven't we been through this in another place? In the following link to Richard Dawkins' quotes, the word "truth" appears 17 times. Apparently he does not share your opinion either. https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Richard_Dawkins E.g. Gravity is not a version of the truth. It is the truth. Anybody who doubts it i…

It is stupid to believe in DNA gene theory .Since chemical evolution is a fairly tale. It is against mathematics and against statistics and second law of thermodynamics.

My question is do you masturbate? I am doing a survey on this forum to get an idea of who masturbates and who does not masturbate. I think we can all be mature about it as we are mostly adults and can be serious about such topic and leave out the baggage that sometimes people associate masturbation with.

stop advertising, please

Warp Mechanics By: Winner568 Part 1: Trine 00. Efficiency is consummate. 0. A unit is a nexus. 1. Congruency adds density. 2. Contraption brings exchange. 3. Efficiency is congruent. 4. Congruency exists therefore efficiency to a unit is true. 5. Therefore efficiency to unit congruency to efficiency to "therefore" exists. 6. Congruency exists so given efficiency exist and are true. 7. Congruency yields a unit. 8. Units an efficiency exist therein together as a function 9. As written in step #8 therefore(-ness) as well functions therein. In conclusion these things are cohesive. 10. Congruency causes (creates) causality. 11. Units have novelty. …

“For a completely consistent and connected understanding of the Universe you need to begin from the most fundamental rational and materialist perspective that’s possible. With its over-riding commitment to mathematics and measurements and other abstractions, the physics establishment is an abstractionist paradigm that’s not completely rational and materialist and doesn’t begin from the most fundamental perspective. By adopting a completely rational and materialist and truly fundamental perspective, many of the theories and interpretations of the abstractionist paradigm are overthrown and this leads to the realization of new fundamental laws and the infinite existence and …

In science, a phenomenon is ubiguitous. All weather & storms in the world are related in some ways. This is a science forum, so we are not having a geopolitical discussion here.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/En_(Lie_algebra)#Infinite-dimensional_Lie_algebras Here's exactly what I'm trying to plot here, let me make it simple with just the x,y coordinates, for S(0->1) iterations, for circles: We start with the koch snowflakes. Then we derive the circles for S(0->1): https://i.imgur.com/OvPzN53.jpg https://i.imgur.com/q1OehTs.jpg So the circles' diameters are taken from the width of the triangles at their middles not their bases. S(0) has 4 circles... There's 12 vectors connecting 12 planes at 2•3 for [(X,Y),(X,Z),(Z,Y)]+[(45 degree rotation (X2,Y2),(X2,Z2),(Z2,Y2)] + 2•3 for [(X,Y),(X,Z),(Z,Y)]+[45 degre…

The distance within the galaxy is like the distance between the center of the atom and the proton relative to the chord in the String theory '' if we Considering that the tendon represents the scientific community that is looking for the exit from the planet and the search for new worlds'' and the travel of humans between galaxies, which is like the impossibility of the traveling of an String from atom to another atom, I think humanity must find something deeper and less small. The universe is considered infinite. Small particles within the atom must also be considered infinite .

"Yo sup cuh me and ma homies from da hood just kikn back bein coolio, kswiss homie, kill a slob when i see a slob" But for real though what geometric sequences or scientific method can be used to explain the infamous crip walk.

I can tell you how the universe was created, there is evidence to support this and we find this in observing a star having a supernova and then becoming a black hole. This indicates that a star receives its fuel from somewhere else because of the wormhole that is a black hole pulls everything inside its gravity field into the black hole. So the "Big bang theory" is a theory based upon the scientific observation of Galactic movement. That means the galaxies are moving out from one point in the universe from which they were constructed but to theorise that this is from an explosion is just a guess. A star cannot form from an explosion no matter how big it appears as a delib…

Infinite universe? Show me stars older than the age of the Big Bang universe ... there should be many.