Speculations

I'd like to make a formal apology for the confusion (I had) with work. I used books from the 1950's (used in German technical colleges) & other authors from 1990's using the same (wrong) concept which did NOT use the g factor with mass m (partly to do with SI convention usage (weight dropped, for mass) & partly not). (James) Watt's (work) concept of pounds (=weight) yards, per second is (quite) acceptable. My "Work" (word usage) in the COW thread should be replaced by "wark" (to distinguish it as "moma" (average momentum)); except for "work's energy" which is standard physics "work".

I do not believe in Time Travel. Can some one help. Photons of light compress the space in front of them and stretch it behind them causing waves, the double slit experiment works with both electrons and photons, the effect in space is therefore the same. The track of photons in a gravitational field is bent by gravity (the stretching of space) An electron orbiting an atom in a radioactive clock will be affected by its movement in a gravitational field, as will any photons emitted. Can time displacement not more correctly be explained by instrumentation error? If not why not? Is time dilation and time travel not like the kings new clothes. Just because ev…

Retro causality phenomenon: Continuous Motion can only be achieve with the understanding of the law of Relativity as stated by ? ~no preference frame ; and i explain. On Earth the probleme is that the Earth has more mass than the opposite force ,,,generated from the mechanism of the machine so, its unthinkable to use the Earth as a frame because the earth would have to spin with the other frame, the green frame witch is needed to create an opposite force witch is necessary to achieve continuous motion on earth So!~ what i did ; i have replaced the Earth by creating the blue frame and ''pinned'' the blue axis ,witch I called the world axis but free to rotate at its base …

link removed Click on Continuous dynamic motion for the information. Continuous Motion can only be achieve with the understanding of the law of Relativity as stated by ? ~no preference frame ; and i explain. On Earth the probleme is that the Earth has more mass than the opposite force ,,,generated from the mechanism of the machine so, its unthinkable to use the Earth as a frame because the earth would have to spin with the other frame, the green frame witch is needed to create an opposite force witch is necessary to achieve continuous motion on earth So!~ what i did ; i have replaced the Earth by creating the blue frame and ''pinned'' the blue axis …

2 space ships leave each other at light speed c. What are their length contractions & time dilations? (E.g. wrt to earth, each is travelling c/2.)

I have been thinking on semi/super conductor elements/compounds and processes, I know there is a lot I do not understand, but would like to ask the odd question, My first, which will help me refine/dismiss a few ideas, Is about the effect of magnetic fields, and whether they do or could play a part in what temperature a element/compound has to be cooled to? or the amount of pressure needed to phase change? I ask this has a believe rightly or wrongly that magnetic fields alter the electrons orbital, either slowing/speeding up, or altering its radius, Take for instance 2d Boron, which is only a atom thickness, but would have to be cooled to 10-20 Kelvin, Would …

Hello you all! Models for the hydrogen atom and hydrogen-like often tell that the relativistic correction acts on the electron's mass as a consequence of the kinetic energy. Though, the kinetic energy equals half the (negative) electrostatic energy, so if the electron carried half of the electrostatic energy, the effect would cancel out the kinetic energy. What do you think? To check that, I took the energy of last ionisation for varied elements so the relativistic effect varies, there http://www.webelements.com/hydrogen/atoms.html hoping the data is measured and accurate enough, since the effect is at most 1%, and tinkered a spreadsheet RelativisticHydrogen.zip (expand…

I have made research from experimentation in mechanic and the result is !~ Every frame that belong to the same axis; time is the same.../ 2 frames that belong to a different Axis ../ time is different .

Dear All Thanks for the excellent support which I have got from you. Now I have much better visibility on the BBT. It is clear to me that the science community takes the BBT as the only feasible solution for our Universe. Therefore, a BBT filter applies on any evidence or idea. This is a severe mistake. Our Universe is infinite in its age and in its size. The Big bang is needed to set only the first SMBH in the whole Universe. Once it is there, by using Higgs Boson, Newton gravity and velocity momentum in space, I can explain every phenomenon in our Universe, so simple and clear. There is no need for acceleration expansion, infl…

I already posted this idea before but I want to share it in this speculation forrum to find it's flaws if there is any or in other words accept critics so that I am able to further develop this idea. So now the idea behind this is that, what we experience as time is actually the change of matter in this space-time reality. What we commonly notice about time is actually the changes that matter had undergone.Time is my idea is merely a measurement of that change in matter in this space-time reality which we are part of. To summarize this idea, here is the formula: Time= change of matter Time here represents the measure of how much change the matter had undergon…

Haywire (Extra Activity/Active Badness) To access white’s potential to haywire, use orange and blue work intersection to realize the white’s work potential to energy through a work access recombination. The orange driving white against the blue with the existence looping back to drive another white against the same point in the blue starts to cause the haywire effect at the point in the blue the orange is driving the white against by stacking up white effect into extra onness in the same spot. Feeding this effect through other colors will activate a felt badness effect. This is because it acts like overactive energy at this point. The overactive energy fed into se…

When I calculate neutron decay, into proton & electron using momentum & starting (both e & p) with light speed c instead of (the neutron's) 0 m/s, then I get a mass deficit of 2 electron masses instead 3/2=1.5 electrons, e.g. what you call an anti_neutrino. Please show me a neutrino "particle" that you claim to have discovered, I've never seen 1.

Every complex natural system has a self-checking mechanism. The solar system is in balance because of gravity, the earth has trees, a water cycle and an atmosphere, living creatures all have regulatory systems. What if life started forming to create balance on turbulent earth and living creatures developed consciousness and the ability to think to keep their instincts in balance? It could be argued that in order to have a complex system, there needs to be some sort of balancing agent and so through random chance complex systems form and survive because the conditions were right but it does not explain the need for increasing complexity. What if imbalance followed by the r…

According to my latest thought experiments the electron should always be a particle. How can it be anything else in an expanding universe? But the double split and countless other experiments prove that it is also a wave. The wave observation might be explained by a principle, whereby the cloud of possibility itself is spinning. Seems to me that this would explain the wave like properties we observe, if for some reason, it stops spinning when we observe it. Is it possible that the detector somehow changes the spin to be perpendicular to the target or perhaps stop the spin altogether somehow? I wonder what might happen if we turn the detector film at a 45 degre…

If our theory of Quantum Entanglement is accurate, could that be a means to other dimensions? Or even more so, since we are all made up of pieces of old stars, planets, and matter, could we ourselves be entangled with other particles in other parts of the universe? Perhaps, visions we see, certain feelings, etc could us be interacting with these entanglements. I like to go down these kinds of rabbit holes, feel free to endulge lol. The questions unasked can never be answered.

I once flipped a coin & it finally landed on edge. I was just wondering how you would calculate the probability of that (happening, because it never happened again). That (edge_stand) would be the (undecided) maybe answer, between yes & no. Assuming we know the diameter D thickness T density (rho) & leaving you free to choose your own flipping method (calculation, e.g. height h, twist rate, etc what(ever) you need, for the normal way people flip coins & coin contour): is there a way to calculate that probability (for edge standing)? E.g. (100%=) 1=H+E+T heads, edge, tails (H=1-T-E, E=1-H-T, T=-H…

I want to start with Schrödinger personally. We have reason to believe that on the subatomic level, in the absence of a conscious observer, all possibilities occur with the actual one being what is aligned when the situation is observed. Quantum entanglement I think? But in metallurgy , there's info on subatomically removing the lattice bonds In Certain metals, to induce a liquid state at room temp. I can try to find it again if need, but with that idea, couldn't we knock around the "lattice bonds" of unobserved confined events?

If I knew what I'm talking about, I would enlighten the world in a declarative Thread. This is just an old man asking what nobody has explained to me in several generations. [The following are all questions, even tho I didn't put question marks after them.] Speculation A: Some DNA or RNA fell in a meteor and was not incinerated. (But that just moves the question back a kazillion years to another world.) Speculation B: The world is large. The oceans are wide. Rainwater dissolves just about everything and flows on down to the sea. Atoms and molecules of just about everything bang …

1. What is the kg of the gravitationally effective mass of the Sun's photons blocked by the Moon at eclipse ??. Wikileaks says that an average of 1426 watts of the Sun's radiation hits the Moon per square m (ie 1426 joules/sm/sec). And that 89,875,517,873,681,764 joules (of radiation energy??) are equivalent to 1 kg of mass (i guess that this is based on E=mcc). The Moon's radius is 1,737,100 m. Distance tween Moon & Earth is 380,000,000 m. Speed of light is 300,000,000 m/sec. I calculate that this equates to 6.842 kg of the Sun's photons (blocked by the Moon) in each metre tween Moon & Earth. And the total mass of photons along the 380,000,000 m is 1.3…

Swansont wisely told me not to hijack someone else's Thread. After I did. Swansont told me to start a new Thread. So here it is. A modern-day Alchemist suggested (speculated!) in these Speculations that we could turn lead into gold by putting a lead atom next to a hydrogen atom (that shouldn't be too hard) and then synchronizing their vibrations until they merge. No. It was even more technical than that. Line up their axes of spin. And their temperature. And . . . No. I'm getting this all wrong. The solar furnaces make heavy atoms out of light ones all day and all night. That might have something to do with their kazillion-degree…

Mass m vs speed_difference v "trade_off" is very important for conservation of momentum (com). Unfortunately conservation of energy (coe) doesn't see (=conceptualize) things the same way, & instead (some sort of) a speed_squared vs (single) mass relevance exists (or should it?)! E.g. How can both laws be valid, when they seem to contradict? Does (kinetic) energy really have a mass vs speed_squared trade off? E.g. in collisions. If NOT, then why do we use it (=(the) energy_construct)? That's 4 questions. Thanks in advance.

Speculation I opened a storage box yesterday and found a book my wife bought for 10 years ago by Stephen Hawking, I had not read it. I was accused of not reading it so I started reading. I think Hawking is mistaken in some of his claims, he bases most of his ideas on. The ideas below in no way contradicts quantum theory, particle physics, string theory, dipole theory, monopole theory etc as I understand them. It does however lead to a slightly different idea of gravity and how the universe works, ie space and questions the conclusions of Einsteins little time slowing experiment. I do not view science as a religion, to be believed no matter what! Let the Sp…

I speculate that my physics professor was correct sixty years ago about the variable speed of light. The evidence he showed us was a simple nine-dollar magnifying glass. He said light goes slower in glass than in air, and that's why its path is bent in the lens. I don't have any mathematics on that, nor any other evidence. It just makes sense. Maybe he had some more to show us on that, but he didn't. Maybe he had some math on the subject, but he didn't show it to us. But I speculate he was right. And if he wasn't, nobody ever showed up to tell us any different. And here's a further speculation: WestStar is going over half the speed of lig…

If the Mans descend from the ''race'' of Monkeys Why ? are there still Monkeys.

speculation ˌspɛkjʊˈleɪʃn/ noun 1. the forming of a theory or conjecture without firm evidence. After my recent speculation being closed I am some what confused , you seemingly do not understand what speculation means. Is this forums native language English?