Speculations

Light is a section of string vibrating usually between 420 Thz - 750 Thz against the eye which is interpreted by the mind. All made of one string.

And im not really sure why you call it 'mechanics'. Folks are trying to create something that isn't actually there. There are no mechanics in quantum. That is the whole point of quantum. No matter how hard you try it will NEVER happen It aint your fault. The string will not allow us to figure it out And no i have not watched the marvel ant movie. i feel all they are gonna do is f up what quantum actually is I know everyone will just say im crazy. Story of my life dont care. My entire life is th e quantum. i somehow exist in both at the same time

warping and unwrapping consciousness dominate...at least we exist, conscious human beings.

Hello, With MΛRH be the mass of dark energy included in the Hubble sphere at Hubble time tH We still have a dimensional problem because : MΛRH = 2/3 tH3 ... with kilos coming from the calculation of a cube of seconds !!! Note also that this would imply an increase, in the Hubble sphere, of the mass of matter (dark and/or baryonic) with the age of the universe. This does not exist in the consensus cosmological models today. In the same way one always has with a dimensional consistency problem: at tH, ΩΛ = 4/3 G/c3 tH2 These dimensional coherence problems (always with the same ratio with respect to the measurements) may have …

Difficulties in comprehending z boson mass and its neutrality, the attached file shows the dance, let make science simple, maybe simple things solves difficult issues and imaginations, what's your take? Z boson.pdf

On a serious note, its deeper than this maybe logic will take us to everything.

Since the introduction of Special theory of Relativity (SR), Lorentz invariance has been a fundamental part of our description of nature. Over the past decades, this (Lorentz invariance) was tested and verified by many research groups and almost no Lorentz violation has been found. However, when we look at the Lorentz transformations, we can mathematically find that they are not symmetrical relations. In fact, the inertial frames are not symmetrical in relation to each other and as a result, there must be a reference frame. If the inertial frames are symmetrical in relation to each other, as the SR argues, some paradoxes and contradictions are happened. Hence, we need to …

Would it be possible that the airplane did a ~soft 'landing' on sea without engines running by whatever failure, and by the 'soft' impact with the sea, the fuselage deformed/cracked preventing escape doors to open and later sunk in one piece, leaving no floating traces

The proton model according to particle physics is seriously threatened by properties of the proton detected by experiments in the last two decades. The drama of the current proton model is that it was developed from the principle of symmetry, and therefore it is impossible to explain a recently discovered property of the proton, which requires the proton to have an asymmetric structure. We will talk about this enigma, which invalidates the current proton model, at the end of this topic, after showing the calculation of the proton's magnetic moment, through a new model, which, in addition to being asymmetric, has another property that does not exist in the current mo…

There is not in current theoretical physics an atomistic structure of the electric field, despite more than 70 years ago Wolfgang Pauli said in his Nobel Lecture: "From the point of view of logic, my report on ‘Exclusion principle and quantum mechanics’ has no conclusion. I believe that it will only be possible to write the conclusion if a theory is established which will determine the value of the fine-structure constant and will thus explain the atomistic structure of electricity, which is such an essential quality of all atomic sources of electric fields actually occurring in Nature." The book *************** was published in 2021, by ***…

There is not in current theoretical physics an atomistic structure of the electric field, despite more than 70 years ago Wolfgang Pauli said in his Nobel Lecture: "From the point of view of logic, my report on ‘Exclusion principle and quantum mechanics’ has no conclusion. I believe that it will only be possible to write the conclusion if a theory is established which will determine the value of the fine-structure constant and will thus explain the atomistic structure of electricity, which is such an essential quality of all atomic sources of electric fields actually occurring in Nature." The book Subtle is the Math was published in 2021, by the E…

I observe that g/G is the distance to the sun. Before I add own thoughts on this, I offer this up to discussion. What might be the reason for this coincidence?

I will start with a few axioms that will justify my logic First and foremost is a quote from Albert Einstein " We cannot solve our problems with the same thinking that we used when we created them." Second, there is no evidence of a gravitational attraction between masses. Third, dark matter is not matter at all. It is a field of pre-atomic emergent energy particles (neutrinos). Finally there was no big bang that started atomic creation. Atomic creation started with zero point energy (neutrinos) organizing themselves, through gravitational collapse and electronic organization into atoms. Heat is a byproduct of atomic activity built up over billions of years. The c…

There's something that have passed unperceived Physics that would severely affect it in many areas because of its consequences. Please read with attention, the problem was described with care. The real equation of force is F = ma Today's Physics is stating that the Equation of Force is F = dp/dt. We will analyze the equation of motion of rockets to see that the real Equation of Force is: F = ma A rocket has variable mass in its trajectory and it's important to see its motion equation. Let m be its variable mass at any instant in its movement composed by the mass of the rock…

You are right. There is no actual time dilation or length contraction for anything. They are only perceptions/observations. This might cause a stir here, but it's true.

Gravitational Index of Refraction Using the surface gravity entropy of the form: [math]\mathbf{S} \leq k_B\frac{2 \pi\ c\ E}{\hbar \kappa}[/math] Plugging in the dimensions of the surface gravity will yield a ratio which we can surreptiously take as the index of refraction which can be both expressed in terms of electromagnetic or gravity models. For example: [math]\mathbf{S} \leq k_B\frac{2 \pi\ c\ E\ t}{\hbar\ v} = k_B\frac{2 \pi\ n\ E\ t}{ \hbar}[/math] Where [math]n = \frac{c}{v}[/math]. Such ideas in which gravity can be treated as a special limit of some optical theory has long impressed me. In the context of the free-space wavenumber […

When something cools down it gets colder, hence it's coldness increased, so can't you say that coldness flowed into the warmness?

Hi all, I wanted to write new thread about this topic just because there is just too much text in the previous one. I also change the perspective and look directly to a important question: how cosmological observations constrains shrinking matter theories. I was thinking if this is repetition but i wasn't sure. If many of you think this is repetition maybe i then ask you to delete this thread. So Here in this topic i look what kind of observational constrains there are for shrinking matter theory. First why do i still bother thinking shrinking matter theory? --------- MRS Hawkings have published (2010) a result that quasars don't exhibit effects of time …

Abstract We first prove that nuclear structure is not randomly arranged nucleons. We then develop a geometric model for nuclear structure using JP data from the Internet. The model shows why Be(p = 4, n = 4) is unstable while Be(4, 5) is stable. It predicts correctly the mode of decay of unstable isotopes and it predicts the daughter isotope. It also predicts why Tc(43, n = 54 or 53) is unstable and why Tc(43, 52) is not allowed and why all other isotopes of Tc are unstable. There is also a clear indication of why nuclei of p > 26 require energy to form. Knowing the relative position of the particles may make field computations easier. The model also explains wh…

I have similar theory explaining dinosaurs' extinction by gravity change. But I explain it by other way. I have hypothesis that gravity of planets has a relativity to solar gravity. Thus, when gravity of Sun changes on the planet's orbit, it affects to planet's gravity function. Gravity potential doesn't change because planet's mass doesn't change. But the superposition of gravity function changes while the local gravity system of the planets changes its size. When gravity system change its size, but planet's size is constant, the gravity on the planet's surface changes its value. For examle, if gravity of Sun on the Earth orbit will change with factor 2, the si…

Theories on the nature of quantum geometry and entropy. I am not sure whether or not you are familiar with the theory of quantum geometry, but I think it is rather interesting. Naturally, we are used to operating in the third dimension, as with the interaction of 3-D objects. In the 2nd dimension, we would only observe three-dimensional objects from the view of a two-dimensional plane. All we would see is the cross-section of a ball going through our plane, as though it were a shadow. It would, therefore, makes sense that geometry is also pervasive through higher dimensions. In theoretical physics, Albert Einstein postulated that there may be an affect on grav…

With so many, how does one pick a favorite?

I think that maybe this could actually work, almost. Feel free to ask questions about this here, but for expediency, an explanation of the theoretical operation of this Maxwell's Demon can be found here: https://stirlingengineforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=5338&p=18503#p18503

in the world we are now the space had 3 dimensions... The majority of the animals have evolved a bilateral symmetry shape.......besides some simple creatures that have no symmetry or some other simple ones having radial symmetry In plants but the main bodies like the trunks of trees and branches again have radial symmetry or the fruits mainly have radial......but the leafs mostly have bilateral..... Also in animals those who have 3 dimensional vision have two eyes that have a large portion of each eyes field of view common with the other one and the two eyes must not me too close to each other i mean the animal needs…

If gravity didn't exist, then nor would the normal force exist (upward force from ground). So to reconcile gravity as a contact force as opposed to an action at a distance would require an altered viewpoint on multiple forces. I once gave an example in the philosophical antirealism thread about the irregular rotation of the Earth somehow creating a downward Euler force to mimic gravity. In my lucid dreaming thread (profile blog) I recalled an experience of going up in an elevator and having the backpack increase in weight relative to the horizon. So I wasn't throwing the backpack upwards and rather I was going upwards in sync with the elevator floor. I don't know much abo…