kba

And again. The next evidence for the Dynamic Gravity is here https://www.spacedaily.com/reports/New_Study_Reinforces_Evidence_for_Modified_Gravity_in_Wide_Binary_Star_Systems_999.html also here https://medium.com/@gabriel.macedo.brother/new-theory-for-gravity-46284969714c An acceleration of the inertial movement is more viewable on the far distances!

https://www.livescience.com/space/unexpected-cosmic-clumping-could-disprove-our-best-understanding-of-the-universe also https://physics.aps.org/articles/v16/193 This is one more reason to consider conception of Dynamical Gravity.

T.Rex was able to have such big head because he hadn't normal-sized "hands", so his body was perfectly balanced for walking on the land.

According to what?

Like being at the center of mass in the geocentric and heliocentric model of the Universe.

I wrote "it sounds like", not "=". It's how do you like. The name of article is "Speed of the Milky Way in Space". May be "velocity of the milky way" isn't equal to "Speed of the Milky Way" for you and for article's authors? I don't know. Or/and "Space" isn't equal to "the universal level" by Bufofrog’s? May be ask him?

It sounds like a heliocentric or early christian geocentric model of Universe 🙂 Just read this

Yes, of course. Evenly distributed mass is better for uniform acceleration. It connected with dynamical nature of gravitational force. Do you know about "retarded potentials"? If no, then I have to provide this link for you. How about an extra velocity of stars on numerous galaxies which scientists connect with mistiqal Dark matter? Just look at name of topic you comment ) And, can scientists directly register a = 0.00000000868 m/sec² for our Galaxy or its stars?

Did you already considered it? In the absolutelly empty space with no other bodies, particles and fields. Do you know what Aristotle said about it?

For what? Are you waiting that calculations will show something different that Newton's mechanics? Only calculations I can provide right now is a caluculation of global gravitational acceleration (inducted by a forces of "faraway stars" - by "Mach's principle" - that support any motion). This acceleration, accordingly to estimated mass and size of Universe, is about: a = MG/R^2 = 0.00000000868 m/sec. What difference on a gravity force between the Earth and Moon in the static you can get with such value of acceleration? Just a microscopic one. At the same time, the global acceleration is able to accelerate the proton of any star upto: v=273.7*10^9 m/sec per 1 billion years - it's almost the speed of light! And it can accelerate the stars in the galaxies, that speeds are different from described by Newton's mechanis, aspecially on their periphery. Do you think that higher velocity of these stars is because of "Dark matter", which holds the stars on their orbits, and which cannot be acted by other forces? I do not think so. I think that spiral look of galaxy shows us how stars goes away from its center, accelerating by global acceleration of so-called "inertial motion" (which, actually, isn't uniform and stright lined)

Yes, if this body is free. This declaration of Newton's First Law is absolutely incorrect. There is no uniform motion for free bodies. All of them or keep in rest, either moves with acceleration which you cannot register locally, at the short distances.

My interpretation of inertia law: A body will not move, unless acted upon by a force. Just compare with Newton's First Law. Still,

I don't understand what do you mean with your example. Your book in the same time does move with your table arount the Earth's axis, around the Sun, around the Galaxy's center, etc.

#AmaterasuParticle is the next evidence for my theory after #OMGParticle. Should wait for next one? 😉

Do you believe they didn't adjusted it? ) Chernyaev said that his scales measured order of 10-5 of weight.