Speculations

I have seen in a video on 3d modeling for games, that when you copy a 3d mesh with an Array Modifier, that every copy is relative to the initial start position of the original object being copied....and that every movement thereof is relative to the original copied object's "point of origin in this case x. Since " in 3d" the origin is smack in the center of XYZ in which your 3d model is positioned "at the start of assigning a primitive cube", then should relativity take place at 1/2 of "ANY" object's size, when "copies" or duplicates are involved? In other words, if you measure "something" don't you have to start it at 1/2 of its size not the initial start positi…

Oh yes it is. You see it on films, which are the government preparations so we won't go mad when they arrive. Have you never heard of pyramidology? It is the science of pyramids. Take a sharp razor blade and put it under a cardboard pyramid. It left undisturbed, it won't go blunt in 400 years. Nice try, with your photoshopped fake, but the aliens would not just allow themselves to be photographed like that.

Avoiding the maths, I am actually doing nothing but inverting the perfect fluid tensor. This would make no different predictions than the [math]\Lambda CDM[/math] model, except you would still have to add in extra curvature to account for the dark matter. This is just mathematically consistent, whereas the current model does not seem to be mathematically, logically or physically consistent. If you happen to know whether subtracting [math]G_{\mu\nu}[/math] from [math]\Lambda[/math] has ever been historically discussed, please let me know as I cannot find it and seems to be too simple of an explanation not to have been proposed before. Particles vs Waves The Ein…

Assume that the adopted standard of time in our region of the universe is a selected pulsar with a rotation cycle of 1 second,and that the clocks on Earth and on all other space objects, including those with very big mass, are synchronized by the pulses of the pulsar. Thus, these clocks will always indicate the same time, everywhere in space, regardless of the mass of the object upon which they are located. This example, therefore, contradicts the truth of the gravitational time dilation. Am I right?

I have truly in my opinion cracked a code that is far from completely solved but I am definitely on the right track and I believe that what I have discovered is proof to clearly state that there is in fact a God. I am challenging anyone in the World to attempt to prove or disprove the information that I have available. I have tons of information that I can readily bring to the table but am only willing to give it to you through email. I will give you an example on this forum but if you want the full story you would have to email me for additional free information, fair enough? Good, I hope that makes sense. So here is the code that I have discovered its quite sim…

The concept of dark matter involves a physical objects' internal quantum vibration exeding "cresendo point" which is 186,000 mps. Once you can achive that (it is possible by means of coherance and charge) the same vibrational framework allowing it to stay mateialized in our 3 dimensional reality spacetime, becomes inverted, resulting in de-materialization. Were does the matter go? If your talking about inversion, than you know that if you leave space-time, you end up in time-space. The matter itself will never go away. ever. Were we are now (spacetime) you have 3 dimensions of space, while time is a constant (1D), of course. Once again since inversion has occured, timesp…

Plain English Physics 101-1 Excerpts from Published under new title Modified Monday, May 21, 2012 johnlawrencereed jr Excerpt on Ptolemy: Where Wigner noted the "uncanny" usefulness of mathematics, I noted that the usefulness remains, regardless of the veracity of our a priori assumptions. As an example, first consider the Ptolemaic, Earth centered model of the solar system. The sole quantitative connection to the real universe in this "still useful" model is the efficient, least action, time-space property, attendant to each of the otherwise contrived, circular, cyclic and epi-cyclic orbits. A circle is an efficient enclosure of area. Equal arc length…

One idea that has been recently proposed by the pioneer Fred Alan Wolf, is that consciousness created the Big Bang. He is possibly well-known by many as being one scientist who has shined importance on the role of the observer and how things do not exist until they are observed. What you will find in many of his books however is that they don't actually define observers very well -- and anyone left after reading his books might believe that only human observers actually collapse the wave function and create the world around them. It is true a thing does not really exist until it is pulled out of its wave function. The smearing of possibilities however can collapse wi…

I am just wondering what everybody thinks happened at the start of the universe. A big question with many different theories. I'm curious to see the most common belief and the most unusual. Links are appreciated. So how do you think it all started? Personally, i believe in the expansion theory.

I did not intend on hi jacking another post for this. Please do not think that I am intentionally disrespecting your rules. Plain English Physics 101-4 Excerpts from Published under new title Modified Monday, May 21, 2012 johnlawrencereed jr Excerpt on Newton: In any event, our problem did not begin with J.J. Thompson. Some 2000 years after the Ancient Greeks, Tycho Brahe's careful observations on the behavior of celestial planetary bodies and Kepler's subsequent careful analysis of those observations revealed that the symmetry is in time and space. The predictable solar time-space least action consistent symmetry was subsequently co-opted by Isaac N…

If we consider the Global Universe as the total Universe. (infinite or finite). and we consider Our Universe like that Universe that we know (from 10 exp -35 to 10 exp +27 meters), I propose the idea that we can divide the Global Universe in various (infinite) power of 10 levels or spectra (see attached file). Like a RAINBOW or MATRYOSHKA DOLLS. These levels/spectra can be posives or negatives, and we can supose that aprox. every googol (10 exp 100) could be a very different Universe with its own science laws, waves, entities and possible living beings. The shape and appearance of Our and Global Universe is only a "virtual" or "apparent" Univers that we sap…

Plain English Physics 101-5 Excerpts from: Published under new title Modified Friday, June 15, 2012 johnlawrencereed jr Excerpt on Avogadro's Number: I have defined mass as the conserved comparative resistance of non-uniform (and uniform) atoms in response to and as a consequence of a uniform attraction on all atoms (see Part 1, this publication). We get close to this when we measure amounts of atoms or molecules in moles as we optimize our chemical reactions. The relative atomic weight of an atom expressed in grams as weight [mg] using the periodic chart represents one mole of that element. Although we call this an atomic weight [mg] one mo…

If we see space and time as generated by mass and energy, it is suggested to develop reduced physics, giving up the notions of space and time The article published now on a website has not passed the peer review of NATURE, but nevertheless it seems to be a very different and attractive way to tackle the question of a primary system. This approach could even reconcile scientists with recent development in minimal arts and allow for a modern definition of the term of transcendence. As neither the standard model nor the Big Bang model nor even the relativity theory with the cosmological constant are free of hypothetical assumptions mainly in form of interpreted constants…

The quantum universe. About ten years ago, I understood how the universe works. My thoughts would destroy the current theoretical physics would also be beneficial for applied physics. And of course, beneficial to mankind. Can anyone advise a good physical magazine, best to contact a specific person who would be open to new ideas? I understand the universe at the quantum level, and I have answers to many questions! Now I just need a good manager. Thank you for your help.

Could gravitation and time not exist in pure darkness??? If so then can derivative calculations really be a simple 180 degree "turn" mistaken for .5 c or simply 0 the initial start of the system? In this simple formula of mine, I have found that this may be the case: 1/ [1/ x + t] / 2 * x * t * phase cycle = 1 Just a note here: x + t = k of the metric, manifold or matrix. 1 means 1 second in mm/s The 2 is the squaring of x and t "inverted." Using this simple formula I have provided as an example set x = 12 and t = 6 = 2[.866] mm/s rather yet beta the electron. This find only applies to rotating celestial bodies and or anythi…

Zhou Jian Star Chart 2012065 found that the IC 2574 is a pure Doppler blue shift deviation of dwarf galaxies Picture / Zhou Jian (周坚)/ June 18, 2012 （611, Liuchang road, Liu Bei district , Liuzhou city , Guang Xi ,China 545012 E-mail：13237720248@163.com） The universe is like this, when you simply to observation it, all the guess may,and when you have mastered the mathematical analysis method to study it again after, all of that guess don't exist. NASA/APOD web site 2012.6.22 IC 2574: Coddington's the Nebula. In fact, this nebula is a dwarf galaxy, based on the NASA / IPAC EXTRAGALACTIC DATABASE verify its apparent brightness of mv is equal to 10.36,and red…

I am kinda n00bish to this so please be simple if you have contributions. I'm calling it the Self Origin Hypothesis.Basically the Origin of a creation is destroyed by the creation.The creation can then become it's own origin.It can be applied to the Grandfather Paradox,going back in time and killing yourself and just about any other parodox

This question has bugged me for a long time. Sunlight "pushes" against 'solar sails.' They call it "solar wind." Laser light "pushes" against the lasers which fire it. They call it laser recoil. Light trapped in a box of mirrors "pushes" against the inside of the box, giving it more static inertia as if it were added mass. Yet the classic thought-experimental spaceship traveling at a significant fraction of lightspeed can not "push" a light shining ahead any faster than its speed limit, 'c.' It seems that the ship must travel into the tail end of that light, absorbing the difference between its velocity and 'c.' And it seems that its momentum acts like…

"Speed of light". It's kind of an antiquated phrase. Sure it's mathmaticaly sound but I think the phrase causes a lot of confusion. To find the speed of somthing you figure how much distance was traveled in a certain amount of time. But with light distance and time become variables defined by the light between two unique reference points, usually an observer and a the light source. For me to conceptualize Einsteins theory of relativity I had to find a different plane of thought. So I started tinking that the ray of light that exists between my eye and say a star ten thousand light years away was actually a defined one dimensional thread of relativity. A ray of distan…

Well, no one moved my post; It seems outside those who can answer it. I want to know what the speculators say. http://www.scienceforums.net/topic/67240-flat-geometry-and-the-wdw-equation/page__pid__685565#entry685565 Speculate away.

Would anyone please help find where is the trick that makes it appear to work ? ----->http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&feature=fvwp&v=RkLfpXpO5sQ

Hello there, had some ideas the other day and made a video .. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FfrUxcCzfks I also have some other ideas about gravity but I will wait and see what response I get here. I have discussed this else where and got a very negative response. Please don't talk from your emotional perspective, I am only interested in the science.

Time has been presented by some as a measure of change. So the question goes like this: can change happen without time? That is not a question about simultaneity (can a change happen in zero time), that's another question. The question is: if you take an event A and say it changes into an event B, do we need time for the change to happen? For example, in mathematics, one can take an equation and make it evolve in a full page of equations following a sequence that can go forward and backward. Isn't it an example of change without time?

I'm not a big fan of Richard Dawkins since he is a total atheist, and me a whimpering agnostic. But I must give kudos to knowledge that is not biased, and only making a statement. 22 minutes in length, but well worth the time to watch. Is it phiosophical rhetoric, or does it ring a sense of truth?

This thought actually came up to me when I was looking at some pictures of distant galaxies. What I was wondering is, given the incredible distances between galaxies, could it actually be possible to colonize other galaxies than our own? Even with Star Trek technology it could still take hundreds of thousands of years to actually reach another major galaxy. If wormholes, warp drive, etc. is possible then I could see intergalactic travel as feasible. But if FTL travel in any form isn't possible at all, then would it even possible to colonize other galaxies and spread all over the universe? For instance, colonization of the solar system shouldn't be that diff…