Speculations

Split from "Is physics about "why?"" Because you're using incorrect model since beginning. And you can't move further with it, cause it's wrong. Going in circles. Bending of space must happens at any scale either quantum, macro and cosmic scale. When light is passing through water which has refractive index = 1.333, v=c/1.333=0.75c Every mainstream physics is saying that c is const, but while passing through some transparent material photons are constantly absorbed and emitted. That's wrong basement. We know how such absorptions and emissions are looking like in electrons: spectral lines, missing photons at one wavelength, and more photons at other wavelength. Wh…

This is the most interresting subject under the sun. Since I started my investigation in 1989 a lot has been found to make EET move up a few notches. My investigations started from a Biblical point of view as things were revealed to me about how the end of the world, as we know it, is going to come about. I am not a graduate in geology but I had the subject in high school. Plate techtonics never made sense to me because between every two spreads you must have a subduction zone and they are not there. Some years ago I tried to put my theory of the expanding earth and the birth of the moon on a web page together to show were in the Bible I got it from and some prov…

I can think of FAR more than just SIX dimensions. Here is a short list of what I have been painstakingly and laboriously constructing myself: 1. The Universe as we can observe it. 2. The Universe or Universes or Multiverses as we cannot observe them. Within our our Universe itself exist several types or layers of dimensions: 1. Space. 2. Time. 3. Matter. 4. Energy. 5. Spacetime. 6. Gravity. Then there are the species types and layers and their own particular dimensions: 1. The Humans. 2. The Animals. 3. The Aliens (if there are any). 4. The Gods (they are definitely there). Within each of these are four dimensions or types or layers to eac…

With regards to the post: Is Mathematics Alone a safe medium for exploring the frontiers of Science. Or should Observation and Hypothesis lead in front ? Here, as an example, is a hypothesis: The electron, proton and photon are made of the same substance. Are people saying that maths is the only method at our disposal to investigate a hypothesis? Because it strikes me that a lot of non mathematical thinking must surely have to precede any output of equations? In the above example, there are lots of observations that can be used, both for and against the hypothesis, so surely they would be discussed before any use of maths?

Could these videos be considered evidence of time travel? Is there any evidence for the possibility of time travel or that time travel has actually occurred?

New version, "Lorentz symmetry broken": Kindly comment. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Koorosh.shahdaei/sandbox

What if the earth's solar system is not what is understood like nine planets revolving around the sun with their individual moons! What if the solar system, the sun, planets, moons are itself a trajectory in space time continuum!!! And they all move in varied time phases but correspond to one another!!! Like suppose the 'big bang' theory as told by H.G.Wells 'the time machine' author what if the red planet is a time phased disintegrating dead star 'Mars' considered to be earth!!! What if then the solar system are itself the phases of earth's orbiter in varied time zones! Now then how can one explain 3700 satellites orbiting over earth? What if the satellites are not…

I saw today back to back episodes of X-files. Some of these episodes i remembered i had seen when i was 14 year old in 1995! In one episode there is a mention of Bio-technology science, invitro fertilization, genetic replication chromosome mapping! So the professor doctor herself named as a fictional character named mrs kendrick, is of genetic cloning with eight like her even character and memory! Created! So she does some genetic experiments where she clones chromosomes! The story seems fictional with agent scully and mulder running around, but the gist might be that kendrick meaning the accountable knowledge force in universe! So the byzantine empire of 1880s in ind…

At the time of the original event(big bang) there was a breakdown of original matter. This consisted of a massif release of neutrinos and one hydrogen atom from each atom of original matter. This event may be along a plane as opposed to a single point. The neutrinos are able to go through the hydrogen but unable to go through residual original matter. The neutrinos have mass and energy. All of their energy is transfered to the residual original matter that they hit, pushing it in the direction the neutrino was traveling. The residual original matter will clump together very rapidly as it is bombarded by neutrinos. the larger the clump the bigger the defici…

Dual Universe theory = on u tube channel = dadiojames007 I believe my theory is sound and provable ...

Please tell me how this hypothesis conflicts with reality. It was agreed on the thread "How can galaxies exist with the expansion of space?" that there are two distinct sources of the acceleration of stars and galaxies. One is the expansion of space and the other is gravity. The equation for gravity has to produce the force necessary to offset the expansion of space. The equation that works today will be wrong tomorrow because the rate of expansion changes. It would be difficult to modify the gravity equation to account for the changing rate because we really don't know how fast it is going to change or even why it is changing. That is why there is a "fudg…

A postrelativist theory is suggested. The theoretical result is in accordance with the experimental one, into this field. The relativistic physics that we use don't permit us to use speeds greater than the speed of light c and thus, the OPERA type experimentals results can't have a theoretical interpretation. The mathematical and physical interpretation of the OPERA type results is done with my theory presented in this paper "About the rest velocity V0", which permit speeds greater then c for particle bodies with steady-state mass m0. All the best, Turcu Vasile rest velocity.pdf

Atoms are actually miniverses at their core lies a black hole the edge of an atom is moving at the speed of light therefore it appears to be a wave and a particle because u can't see into an atom unless u were moving at the speed of light then u could witness a black hole surrounded by particles. This is why when they did an experiment with shooting light into a single atom it came out of the other atom at some distance from the first. The light traveled through the speed of light layer as light moves at the proper penatration speed then entered a black hole in the center traveled through time space and exited the other atoms black hole and then traveled out into the …

The latest geological conception of the genesis of karst terrains, published in respected Springer's journal Carbonates and Evaporites, suggests that the entire Earth's surface was covered with water about 5,000 years ago. The conclusion is derived based on the the analysis of depth of micro karst landforms (karren), which are by this concept, the only karst features formed under atmospheric conditions, i.e. by diluent effect of rain waters. The results represent a serious attack on scientific theory of evolution, which certainly could not happen within 5,000 years. Links of articles are: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13146-012-0125-2 http://…

Super massive volcanoes might actually be a crater from an impact. You might even be able to see an elevated region on the opposite side of the planet which would verify this claim.

i sometimes have this thought, one see's there are separate flows of times occurring within one flow of an over all flow of time. in other words time in time. if my time flow ( frame) can be separated from your time flow ( frame) yet co-exist in one overall time flow ( frame )in the same moment, does that mean the existence we experience appears to be not real . relativity is about time. now if we can separate consciousness from each other and have different realities,but yet co-exist in one whole reality in the same moment, what does that mean.

Time is the measurement of the motion ie mass and electromagnetic volume inherent in a moving object so the static field from wich one references these factors is always I would say a qestion until we can accertain the current speed of our galaxy within the universe. What we do know about time is it is modulated by mass and speed therefore it is a contollable and localized phenomenon based on this odes we can then extrapolate the variables that can control this motion and our time field is then a controlled mathmatical eqaution. As an example if u speed an object up to around 57.000 miles per second u would reduce the flow of time by 1/5 the mass and velocity of the …

Does nature work on the principle of teleportation,with confined quarks acting as anchorage points? Most of the other particles can be converted to energy and recreated somewhere else.

Let us suppose the speed of light isn’t insurmountable, would superluminal travel have increments? As in star trek ‘warp speed 9’ and so on, or would any trip at superluminal velocities be instantaneous? Using the train analogy to describe time dilation, the photon has to travel further and therefore time runs slower relative to the observer, extending this analogy, when travelling at superluminal speeds light would never catch up, hence instantaneous.

First a summary of previous thoughts... Since the time of Albert Einstein it is well known that space and time are related and can be considered together as a 4D Space-time. The assumption was when Einstein formulated his equations that there are 3 Spatial dimensions plus 1 temporal dimension of Time. But what is Time in this context? Einstein's Time is all about the abandonment of universal simultaneity of separate events. Different observers in different reference frames will disagree on the order of events they observe. He gives an example of lightning striking two ends of a train at the same time while those on board see the lightning strikes do not occur at the sam…

here's a mad science topic to discuss. in science fiction, nuclear physics, atomic physics , intrinsic fields of physical objects(supposedly) and dr. manhatten. http://www.imdb.com/character/ch0060115/bio http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=dr.+manhatten&oq=dr.+manhatten&gs_l=youtube-reduced.12..0i10l4.7709.10778.0.40828.13.10.0.3.3.0.446.1797.1j6j2j0j1.10.0...0.0...1ac.1.9P1ehJPDtHA very interesting, for me anyways.

Theory for cause of metastable state - Establishing causality in nature again - Wolfhart Willimczik 2106 72nd St W, Bradenton, Florida 34209 E-mail : Wolfhart@tampabay.rr.com Abstract : Searching for the cause of the existence of metastable states the author offers a first hypothesis: Nature will not start any process basically ready to start, but with several exact equal ways to go until one way distinguishes itself from all others by a noticeable value. An electron in an exited state, what has basically the freedom to choose any direction and any time of emitting light, will not do it by "chance", but only if a specific time and direction is given…

Physicists describe Copernicus’s Theory ‘On the Revolutions of the Celestial Spheres’ as complete rubbish… Physicists summarised the theory’s failings by pointing out that, if the Earth really was flying around the sun, then there would be a great wind as the Earth rushed through the air. The physicists continued, “All you need is one failure of a model to prove that it is false, but if you want more…” 1. If the Earth really was spinning on its axis (as required in Copernicus’s heliocentric theory to explain the diurnal motion of the sky), then why don't objects fly off the spinning Earth? Since things do not fly off, the theory is obviously false. 2. If th…

I've been pondering this question for a while. Is gravity a pushing or a pulling force? I've been going back and forth for a while, but I think that the evidence points towards a pushing force. Recently, I was thinking, ok how about the tides? Gravity must be a pulling force. Well, i just thought about it, and it would seem once again that I can say that it is a pushing force. If you think about the center of the earth, it seems that it wants to expand outward, which would be a pushing force. Looking at volcanoes, the earths magma pushes through the crust. If we were able to survive on a journey towards the center of the earth, I am absolutely certain that we would be pus…

alternative views on 'crop circles'.I've no evidence to backup this 'theory' but just want to put it out there and hope for replies. Although there has been a vast number ov 'circles' recorded I am just discussing those that have appeared in and around Wiltshire , England. Out of those I am only concerned by the ones that can't be attributed as physically "man made" by someone on the ground . I want to concentrate on those where the bottom od the stems have been "blown out" , where residual EM radiation has been detected and where (but not in every case) small balls ov iron has been found . My theory is that these circles are not some supernatural, ET,derived but are made…