Speculations

Expansion could be the result of GWs from beyond the known universe meaning dark matter & dark energy as well as particle charge would have their own respective superluminal velocities. A GW will propagate faster if it is broader, so because GWs propagate at the speed of light (demonstrated by LIGO in 2017) there could be superluminal GWs if adjacent cosmoses are in a later state of expansion than ours is, just as the current speed of light is faster than it was 13.8 billion years ago. Meaning that, & this is important, the fastest GWs have traveled the farthest to get here and have lost the most strength because they've journeyed the farthest. Dark matter & …

So I had an interesting thought, what if instead of the universe expanding due to an unknown cause it is expanding due to something right under our noses? What if the universe is one constant size but the things beyond it's 'boundary' are invisible to us because their light has not reached us yet? There could be a way to account for redshift in ways other than straight expansion due to an unknown cause,. This sounds absolutely preposterous and most likely is, but what if photons produced a warping effect on space? Tiny wakes for each photon, this could explain why Dark energy causes 'expansion' and how such an amazing amount of energy exists at all, because imagine that e…

Assume that a particle of energy is like a universe of matter, with a relatively equivalent amount of mass in adjusted scale. Fall anywhere in space, no matter how seemingly void, and you will land on matter if you're small enough. The Microverse: A microverse is the same principle as a level 1 multiverse, matter can only arrange itself in so many different ways eventually everything takes on the same order again, especially where c covers a unit of distance in less than 1 planck time. Even in quantum theory c does propagate under such extremely short distances in the form of gravity waves: some people claim that a 'Poisson sprinkling' of space-time po…

A blackhole is formed when a very massive star after converting all of its hydrogen to higher elements , collapses under its own weight.The sphere(star) becomes smaller and smaller until it reaches its schwarzschildradius(the minimum radius of a given mass to form a black hole.The small sphere collapses further . It becomes so dense and its gravity is so huge that it breaks the fabric of spacetime such that the laws of physics no longer apply there.The blackhole is formed around it because light cannot escape from its surface as the gravitational pull is simply enormous.There is an apparent surface from which light cannot escape.This is the event horizon. What laws o…

My rational understanding regarding dark matter is it is a continues force that still happening after the "big bang". It is in other words the aftermath of the big bang. According to modern science, physical space itself formed in the big bang. So base on this, dark matter is actually a formation of space that is why our universe expands. The space until now continue to form, pushing previously created space. Now question may arise," Where thus this force creating the space came from?" This question is connected to the big bang and the origin of the universe itself. They have the same answer.

G = Newtonian constant of gravitation D = Descartesian gravitation density UMR Formulae frequency=[(G*D)^1/2] force=[(G*D)^1/2]momentum energy=[(G*D)^1/2]hbar power=[(G*D)^1/2]energy current=[(G*D)^1/2]charge G*power=c^5 G*force=c^4 power/force=c Dark Energy energy=[(G*D)^1/2]hbar energy=[(G*D)^1/2]e^2*z0 energy=[(G*D)^1/2]e^2/e0*c energy=[(G*D)^1/2]e^2*u0*c energy=[(G*D)^1/2]h*2alpha G=c^5/power G=c^4/force force=power/c Dark Matter mass=[(G*D)^1/2]hbar/c^2 mass=[(G*D)^1/2]e^2*z0/c^2 mass=[(G*D)^1/2]e^2/e0*c^3 mass=[(G*D)^1/2]e^2*u0/c mass=[(G*D)^1/2]h*2alpha/c^2 power=c^5/G force=c^4/G power=force*c …

According to science, there's absolutely no correlaton between the size of an object and the gravitational field, which it produces. Science tells, that changing the size of Sun wouldn't have no effect on the planets in Solar System. I don't agree with this. I think, that density of an object has significant importance for the properties of g. field, which it produces. What makes me thinks this way? Well, I've noticed, that celestial objects, which have low density, like a nebula, don't attract other objects with the same force, as planets or stars. If density of objects has no influence on gravity, then try this: - take a beach ball and a golf ball with similar…

I understand, that science is about connecting all the aspects of Universe - but maybe we should discuss here the multi-verse theory (which I personally consider, as sci-fi fairytale), instead of black holes, gravity, CERN, photons and speed of light. Of course black holes might be hypothetically connected with multi-verses (acting as a wormhole?). But until I won't finally see the data, recorded by Event Horizon Telescope, I won't believe in their existence - I'm a scientific atheist and I don't believe in things, which can't be proved by observation and physical measurement http://eventhorizontelescope.org And what, if there's no black hole in the ceter of Mil…

Hello today I'm am going to explain the entire universe and its workings and the future of the universe in basic laymen style terms. The universe in all it's entirety, Everything that the universe its-self consists of (not taking into account particles, liquids and solids - these are like sponges for the universe) the universe is only made of two temperatures (these two temperatures are Hot and Cold), they are the only part of matter, anti-matter, liquids, solids and particles that is in a consistent state, Meaning that no matter what the element or particle is, it will always have a temperature. I am going to post a famous picture with-in the science…

According to mainstream science, gravity is caused by curvature of space-time, which is created by every object with rest mass. To create a physical model of this concept, scientists use a flat rubber surface and some marbles - like on this movie: My concept of gravity can be visualized using water and couple floating objects Force, which is responsible for attraction of floating objects is known, as Cheerios Effect and is explained by the surface tension of a liquid. But I have couple arguments, which allow me to say, that this is a nice way to visualise gravity. Here they are: - objects are attracted, no matter…

Another Post, gave me this idea, for a different way to write this that Mainstream physics would accept and would be simpler. start with 4-D Invariant SR Time-space. ds2 = dx2 + dy2 + dz2 - (Cdt)2 Quantum Equivalence. ∇ =d2/dx2 + d2/dy2 + d2/dz2 = d2(1/dx2 + 1/dy2 + 1/dz2) dxψ2 + dyψ2 + dzψ2 = (d2/∇) Schrodinger equation Solve for ∇ ∇ = ((iħ(d/dt)ψ[r,t] - V[r,t]ψ[r,t])/((ħ2/2M)ψ[r,t]))1/2 Now for the Hard part the Energy Stress Tensor (dxψ2 + dyψ2 + dzψ2) - (dxTuv2 + dyTuv2 + dzTuv2) = 0 Sx2/θx2 = dx2 Δx = ((F/M) * Δt2) dxx = ((σxxAxx/M) * dt2) (Sx2/θx2)+ (Sy2/…

Could the entire universe be considered as having a single quantum mechanical wave function? At the time of the Big Bang the universe was extremely small, of dimensions in which quantum phenomena were dominant compared to gravity, as the entire universe was smaller than a proton. As the universe expanded, matter filled a much larger region, but particles whose wave functions were entangled would have remain entangled. A textbook analogy would be what happens when two elections with equal but opposite momentum are emitted from a source. The resultant particles can become separated by the size of the universe, but their total wave function won’t collapse from its range…

Chadwick noted that a free neutron was extremely unstable, if this is so, should we not immediately shut down Fermi? As we will soon be running out of neutrons.

Did I do a good engineering job on this one? For Anyone that found my Youtube Via another post. My Real life version of the Empire's Death Star in Star Wars. Before you ask it causes Supernova via Rapid Helium Flash. '' http://slideplayer.com/slide/6039599/ Merry Christmas, Any Space-faring civilization would love one of these. My only Type III Civilization technology.

The Purpose of this is to Design Metamorphic Viral Pathogens named after the Synthetic Pathogens for Star Trek Deep Space Nine meaning of Metamorphic in coding Metamorphic Code The Beginning of this will start with this. Here was a Earlier creation the MV-5 Zombie Virus, which is Polymorphic Polymorphic Code In 1969, President Richard Nixon ended all offensive (i.e., non-defensive) aspects of the U.S. bio-weapons program. In 1975 the U.S. ratified both the 1925 Geneva Protocol and the 1972 Biological Weapons Convention (BWC)—international treaties outlawing biological warfare, which has been repealed making this legal. …

With more and better worldwide communication, comes a lot of "anti-science science". Some more ludicrous than others (think of the Niburu hoax, or the "flat earthers", ...) Some, like the Niburu collision course with Earth and whatnot cause quite a panic with some, and I consider this anti-science science to be very dangerous, for various reasons. But, then there are these odd ones, which I have quite a bit of difficulty believing whether these are true or not. To name one: the Atamac Creature; A 13cm tall humanoid, which was around 7 years young at the time of it's death, lacking ANY known form that could explain it's incredible small size (dwarfism, …

Take my word for it, I need this formula and value. IF the electron in a hydrogen atom were in a 2 dimensional elliptical orbit such that it passed so closely to the proton that the separation was negligible(assume it is separated from center of mass of the proton by the radius of the proton with the proton at one focus of the ellipse.). Assume an apogee of the Bohr radius. What would the average kinetic energy be, The max (@perigee) and the min(@apogee)?

What might its peak velocity be and how would its apparent mass compare to its rest mass?

Non-locality has been a main issue between Relativity and Quantum since almost a century, even if Bohr has been considered all this time as the winner of his debate with Einstein. Von Neumann was the first not only to formalize quantic theory, but also to give a mathematical justification to Bohr's conviction that his (Copenhagen) interpretation of the empirical results of quantum physics was the only correct one. Bohm valiantly attempted to revitalize an old de Brolie theory and base his own interpretation on the idea of the pilot wave, a wave that transports particles, as an alternative to Bohr's approach. His theory opened the way to the possibility of hidden vari…

Has anyone ever investigated the idea that the nature of light quanta could actually be the nature of matter to accept energy in specific quantities?

Is there evidence of the particle nature of light in laser interaction?

When an electron is said to have spin, what exactly is spin?

This is a spin-off of my thread "Double slit experiments and superposition". In that thread I had limited myself to that kind of experiment to argue that the so-called superpositon of particles was more a theoretical assumption/conclusion than an empirical fact. People reproached me to limit the discussion artificially and ignore interferometers, especially the Mach-Zehnder interferometer that is considered by many authors as the logical and practical equivalent of the double slit experiment. I will take this equivalence for granted, even though I think it is much more complicated than that. Still, I cannot deny that the same questions can be asked in both exper…

Does anyone else look at this and think echinoderm version of a worm?