Speculations

CHARGE EXPLAINED v2.0 Charge is another one of those things you learn about in physics. Well, you think you do, but you don’t. Not really. The textbooks don’t explain it, and they shrug off this omission by telling you it’s fundamental. It isn’t. It’s as fundamental as mass, which is not very fundamental at all. The thing is this: if you understand mass you already understand charge. But you probably don’t realise it yet. So I’ll explain it. Let’s start with the easy stuff. We know that we can rub a balloon to create an electric field. It can pick up a piece of paper or make your hair stand up. We’ve all seen and felt a spark of static, blue and crackling as …

A recent vision: The farther the electron travels away from mass the less twisting and turning happens. After all, isn't it gravity which induces this effect within it's field? More so, if a galaxy is quadri-polar, and an electron crosses over the galactic plane does it twist the other way? Any thoughts? Anybody know of similar current studies on this?

Could it be that gravity can't be expressed as a part of quantum physics because it is a dimension rather than a field, wave or particle? Could this explain the weakness of gravity? Its independence from jibing with the Standard Model?

(copy paste is causing of adding two words. Please make adjust while reading.) Silence is the indication ofACCEPTANCE Silence is the act of IGNORE, Silence is the act of DISREGARD. There is neither ridiculing nor objection No one supporting, nor appreciation All experts are in the great silence (aboutURAIN paper). Forums always focus on truth. Forum’s always object untruth. Silence will not focus the truth Silence will not object the untruth. I not think that any experts of this forumignoring me. They were read my paper and reading my thread’salso. They are hesitating to give…

Before i begin, a couple things you should know. 1) Im only 12 years old, so dont expect fancy calculus equations that agree with yours. 2) I dont have the money to present evidence for this theory. I'll try to continually post new additions to this theory. If any of my claims contradict, let me know. First of all, the basics. Bullet Physics is the theory of Dimensional, Time, and Space travel. There are three constants per space(half-dimension). the Antimatter ( or M- ) and Matter (or M+ ) Node Counts, and the Energy constant. Basically, the medium between the Antimatter Node Count (M-NC) and the Matter Node Counts( M+NC) is the energy constant

I am relatively new to the WWW and to Forums. For the last 4 month I have attempted to have my paper on the Fundamental Dynamic Nature of an Electron’s Gravity, Gravitation, Electric Charge, Inertia etceteras subjected to examination on another Forum, all to no avail because nobody on the other forum would undertake a fair reading. Due to their ignorance of my work and my inability to explain it in the confines of a post, I was unfairly banned on a charge of trying to introduce crackpot scam; the crackpot scam being that there is a fundamental difference between the phenomenon of gravity and the phenomenon responsible for gravitation. In that regard, is there anybody on …

hi to every one.. we are doing some projects based on balanced coil sensing method.In that we wind the coils like tunnel type.by using this tunnel type arrangement we need to sense the 1mm material of ferrous material.we dont know how many turns we need to wind to get better sensitivity.../ so can you please able to say how to approach the coil windings or it's behavior......?

If Neutrinos really do have mass, could the combined mass of all the Neutrinos present within an entire Galaxy account for the extra mass required to provide enough gravity for a Galaxy to keep its shape?

Does anybody have theories on how to move faster than light? My current theory is that if you could possibly make a gravitational wave you could propel a physical body at the speed of light. If you disagree with my theory please so and please post your own theories.

If, lets say, the c in the theory is not considered a constant, the new angle on the theory would be (c+)2=E/-m. It is a new angle derived from a thesis that antimatter cannot be limited to the speed of light, and that therefore it is confined to intertwining between disintegration and integration in different forms.

Could evolution not just be limited to organisms? I know evolution is the change in allele of a species over a period of time. I know rocks don't have DNA. But is it possible that evolution evolved in itself?

If we think gravitation, strong interaction and electromagnetism how you would describe delivery mechanism? What is the essence of different fields? What makes fields? I think there must be some kind of medium matter (ether?).

On the nature of dark energy and dark matter.pdf Apart from discussing the ideas in the paper, if anybody is interested in exploring the mathematization of the propositions please feel free to communicate. Abstract: The Mach's principle seeks to harmonize the description of the inertial mass of objects with that of the equivalent gravitational mass of objects, by arguing that since any accelerating gravitational mass is describable by referencing it to all the masses in the universe, any accelerated inertial mass arisen object should also be describable by referencing it to all the masses in the universe. However, while acceleration of gravitational ma…

Interestly,he come to this theory,and it it very resonates Anthony Peake's "Cheating the Ferryman" Paranormal SPY Afterlife And here is from Hammond"s website: "In a previous Blog entry (below) containing a letter from Professor Stuart Hameroff U. Arizona, I detailed how a short millisecond signal in the microtubule system of the brain at Frohlich’s frequency could easily contain a year of human experience, and thus even though the bedside observer would see the person expire in a fraction of a second, the dearly departed would subjectively live on for a year in cyber-paradise despite his Frohlich-speed millisecond demise. This then would be the scientific exp…

Right now to me, our fate is looking very dim. We have a population on 9 billion people with large parts of the world becoming industrialized. It was only about 200 years ago the the estimated population reached one billion, It has been going up an an accelerating rate ever sense. I don't know about you but the garbage I don't recycle gets thrown away and I do throw away a little bit every day. Theirs pollution not only in what is being thrown away but also in what is byproducts of manufacturing the very things that are thrown away. All the cars driving around may not be hurting the elements in our atmosphere but we are diluting the normal consistency…

By verifying the shifting direction of stars in an active galaxy we should know if the galactic center generates new matter. As an example - Wikipedia: "The Sun lies between 25,000 and 28,000 light years from the GalacticCentre". What is the expectation for its location in about one billion year from now? This info is needed to verify if the sun is shifting inwards or outwards. Hence, if the sun and all the stars in the spiral arms are shifting outwards, then, there must be a mechanism for new matter creation in the galactic center. Therefore, the steady state theory should be correct. How can we measure the shifting direction of the stars in an a…

First of all if light travels at c in a vacuum according to the math, then why does it travel at c in our solar system which is not a true vacuum? We do know that light travels slower in a denser medium. Slower in water than air, slower in air than our solar system. Does anyone believe the great voids between galaxies are as filled with particles as is our solar system? look at a galaxy photo, they are filled with plasma and dust. It is also likewise clear that the space between galaxies is less dense. Since we have never measured the speed of light outside our own solar system, there is no basis for the claim that the measured speed of c is the same speed in a t…

Ancient Memory and New Vital Force The terminations of massive stars are the fundamental origins ofall things. One great inexorable trend in nature──radical ending of massive stars──supernovae, create the formation of elements in the universe;create the existence of life organism; accelerate landforms variety based oncontinental plates drifting; moreover, the special and fundamental meaning ofsupernovae include pushing forward species diversity on the neighboring planetswhere there are conditions for life forms to appear, etc. The formation of the earth probably came from heavy elementscondensate of the supernova ejecta of last generation star in the inner orbito…

Sirius Nova History Statement: The most reliable scientifictime source is provided by neutrino observatories at the first place. 1. THE TEAR OFSIRIUS 2. THE TEAR OFSIRIUS──Eternal Mystery 3. THE TEAR OFSIRIUS──Glacial Periods Transmigration 4. THE TEAR OFSIRIUS──Neutrino Evidence 5. THE TEAR OFSIRIUS──Observation Edition 6. THE TEAR OF SIRIUS──Kings of thePyramids 7. THE TEAR OF SIRIUS──DEEPNESS DAWN Blog Discussion (url removed) THE TEAR OF SIRIUS.doc Eternal Mystery.doc Glacial Periods Transmigration.doc Neutrino Evidence.doc

Okay so I have this theory (LOL) ... Actually its a fact. All of us are in a different "time" than when we were born. Movement and height changes throughout our life push us forward in time. I just flew around the world, eastward. And I just read in an article that doing this trips you up by about 0.0347 nanoseconds. So technically I have traveled forward in time in relation to the rest of you. So here's my question. It was stated in the same article that if the difference in time could be extended to 2 or 3 minutes, we would "Meet ourself". Maybe that statement is wrong, but at some point you differentiate from yourself. Physically, y…

I was hoping that maybe someone here could take a quick look at this and critique it? I don't have the extensive knowledge or background on physics as the members on here do so I was hoping that perhaps I could get some insight from someone on here. I don't assume that anything I wrote was accurate, just wanted to check up with someone who would know better than I would about these things. If you're willing, please take a look and leave a comment. You can read my post over at url deleted by mod Thanks

I have made new experiments and refined my theory a lot. For Mellinia, you where right, two masses hanging side by side, they gonna contact. But why? Ether does the trick! My theory can explain for example flyby anomaly, Bruce DePalma's experiments and many many more anomalies.

Dr. peter deusberg and other scientists show that AIDS has no relation with HIV. points shown in the video are: 1. HIV has no AIDS causing gene. HIV is identical with other harmless retroviruses genetically. if none of the retros cause disease why HIV? 2. there is no such thing as slow virus. HIV causes AIDS 10-12 years after infection like herpes and cancer virus. but herpes and cancer viruses are active and large in amount whereas HIV is inactive and smaller in amount. generally any virus cause a disease 3 weeks to 1 month after infection whereas HIV cause AIDS after 10 yrs. AIDS is not caused by HIV. 3. HIV is not a new virus, so i…

Hello invented how to create nuclear fusion without high temperatures. I think it might run as follows: 1 Create plasma of hydrogen, deuterium and tritium. 2 let in plasma at high pressure into the reaction cylinder is filled in a vacuum. 3 The cylinder over the entire length shall be placed metal electrodes that are powered pulsed high voltage and high frequency. What would cause vibrated a particle collision and start the fusion. Thank you for your comments and opinions. Goodbye.

Shouldn't the universal wavefunction - as described by the Wheeler-DeWitt equation - be subject to the quantum mechanical version of the Poincaré recurrence theorem? "Quantum Recurrence" http://prola.aps.org.../v107/i2/p337_1 "Note on the quantum recurrence theorem" http://pra.aps.org/a.../v18/i5/p2379_1 A paper discussing the Wheeler-DeWitt equation and quantum gravity http://www.physics.d...o%20Rovelli.pdf Thoughts?