iNow

No thank you

What?

Again, relevance?

Relevance? Of course Are you familiar with the concept of a false dichotomy?

Huh?

How is gender relevant?

It saddens me to report that you’re alone in ejaculating over this exchange.

Your question is unclear. Are you suggesting I should experience shame for loving whomever I choose?

So, you persist in your refusal to answer even basic questions? Perhaps you can try again once you’ve had a nap?

It might’ve been helpful had you actually bothered answering any at all.

Yes Reading comprehension problems rise again! Didn’t you earlier say psychopathy wasn’t real nor recognized? Kinda depends on how one defines “rebellions,” yeah?

Without question, this is clearly the ONLY viable hypothesis. You mean except, of course, with my very first reply that you chose to defecate upon? Genuinely curious. How so, and even if true, why would that matter? And for this I’m genuinely grateful.

At least here we agree But unfortunately here we, without either question or equivocation, do not. Your bigotry sadly seems to be clouding your judgment and preventing an accurate reading of the evidence. Any mental illness you believe you detect is almost certainly a direct result of how so very many feeble minds like yours in our society rejects these individuals merely for being authentic to who they are and honest about who they love.

For what?

Happy to help

Appreciate your feedback.

Wait, what?

Actually, what they reported is that homosexual boys were more likely to be mistreated, not that mistreatment leads to more homosexual boys. Do you also believe carrying your umbrella makes it more likely to rain?

And also a present if we’re being honest It’s rather sad that you’re preemptively exploring justifications. Should we notify the authorities? I’m not ready to accept this as a valid conclusion.

I agree, and that over 20 year old paper has since been refuted. Did you have a point?