iNow

All I did was ask you to clarify your statement. This one: You claimed there is a center of consciousness in the brain. Where do you assert that is?

And that's against the site rules to which you agreed when creating your profile.

So, no? You cannot support your claim? Unsurprising.

No thank you. You claimed there is a center of consciousness in the brain. Where do you assert that is?

I appreciate your honesty. Thank you for acknowledging this.

Right, but I've asked you a question here. Are you actually unable to answer it, or just unwilling? That's fine. You're under no obligation to interact with me, but perhaps you should attempt to clarify your comment for other readers. You said there was a center of consciousness in the brain. Where do you claim that is?

Never really did in the first place, but perhaps now you can answer my actual question?

Which part of the brain do you assert is the "center of consciousness?"

Not at all. Encourage you to just think critically and be cautious of which ideas you accept as helpful and valid and which you treat with skepticism and additional scrutiny.

Once again, where? Which ones? That mention of agenda? It was about stuff like this. No need for this here.

I accept your concession. Thank you for confirming your agenda here.

Then please proceed and do so. As I shared already in response to the first time you posted that one study: That over 20 year old paper has since been refuted and the preponderance of current day evidence speaks strongly against your central assertion.

Right. That’s precisely my question. Which part(s)? Apology accepted, comrade. Again, where?

I must’ve missed it. Where, exactly?

Sure, but will you please answer my question? I asked which parts you have displayed as inaccurate and you said “put.” It doesn’t make sense. Maybe a translation problem? I’m truly devastated reading this. Feelings all hurt and whatnot. Again? You still haven’t addressed that which was already shared.

You really need to refresh yourself on the definition of this word. You keep misusing it. I’m just reporting an axiom.

I would advise caution against thinking JohnSSM is in any way representative of the community here, or the scientific community more broadly. He’s just trolling

Put them what? I see. Thank you for clarifying... comrade. Already done. Perhaps you share the reading comprehension challenges your comrade JohnSSM so regularly displays?

Which parts? So now you’re claiming that I “create a mental and ridiculous atrophy comparable to that of an autistic child,” is that correct? What makes you say this? Lol. Uh huh.

Where? And “we?” So you have a wingman now, or maybe a dissociative personality disorder?

What?

Hmm... in what way specifically are you saying the data I provided is inaccurate? Seems you’re totally ignoring it. To whom or what is this directed? The subject of your comment is unclear. Do you mean me? Do you mean homosexuals more broadly? Is it just a silly stupid personal attack? I’d agree with you, but then we’d both be wrong. Huh? Lol. Okay... sockpuppet.

Incorrect

What?

What?