Bufofrog

Thank you. You need to tie continent formation to the blobs, just stating what you think is not enough. You make many assertions here without discussing viable mechanisms.

If your conjecture states this is impossible and yet it occurs, then your conjecture must be incorrect. Right?

Do you have evidence for these formations?

x^2 does not equal x/x, it equals x*x.

Since the Bohr model is wrong, wouldn't make more since to use a better model for your conjectures?

Suicide is of course not funny but that comment sure was.

It is against the forum rules to just post a link and not present your idea in your post.

It is only straight down from the earths perspective, from a perspective motionless relative to the earths rotation the thing would curve. Both perspectives are equally valid. The same is true for points 2, 3 and 4. No counter force is necessary. If you are moving in a car at 100 km/hr and toss a ball up and catch it you would say it went straight up and straight down. Someone on the road side would see the ball go up and down, but would also see the ball went laterally about 25 meters. The only difference between the 2 observers is that they are in different reference frames. Each perspective is equally valid. Hopefully you see now that this is not the case.

I highly doubt everyone could understand it. It would take words and math to explain it. I am not sure what this has to do with the OP. That would work if I had the right background to understand the proof.

It looks like rebar so HCl should work. You know it will take quite a while to dissolve, right?

He sounds like a nice guy to humor you.

Nope, if you don't know the answer how are you going to pick the right sentnce?

This makes no sense. You would have to already know the answer before you could know which words to use and then to recognize which sentence "makes sense".

You are the one who making a scientific discussion difficult, if not impossible.

You got that concept wrong as usual. I now assume that you are either a poorly written bot or a person just pulling our collective leg. Nobody could be that confused and still be able use a computer. So have fun, I guess.

A cruddy commercial?!

Completely agree, 100%.

Interesting logic. Imagine I could say abra-cadabra and I could turn a tea cup into a mouse. I think that proves magic is real...

I don't have an answer. Maybe someday we will be able to find cures for the majority of mental illness, I hope so.

Yes, there are many drugs, as well as plants that can cause hallucinations. I believe there is also a toad that you can lick to get hallucinations, if you are so inclined.

The answer is yes. Einstein was clearly a scientist and believed in a God.

Except it doesn't. That reaction is not going to produce significant amounts of phosphine in the environment of Venus. Edit: Inserted 'significant amounts' into the statement.

The redshift is due to the expansion of space. The recession velocity is proportional to the distance, due to expansion. There is no movement through space so there is no acceleration. The expansion of space has began to increase but that is not the reason for the red shift. You need to be a bit clearer what you are asking. The BBT matches observations.

Since you are only injecting a substance into your bloodstream, probably you don't need to spend a lot of money on safety. If Putin said it, it must be true.

God is Jewish?