Jump to content


Senior Members
  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

CuriosOne's Achievements


Atom (5/13)



  1. If there is an equal amount of 1/2 fractions of pennies, they can be "glued" together to make them whole again.. "How About That?" 12 "one halves" of 1 penny As 6 10ths of a "deci meter" of 1 second ""Six Tenths"" Again, How about that?? ""Thanks For The Image""" Neither am I...Apparently though I'm onto something greater than u can imagine..
  2. Does the same apply for pennies as to atoms? Oh I forget its not atoms we measure but "matter material" thats "some how" is massless unless gravity effects it...😎 Thank god for Galileo..
  3. Agreed... So if our 100 pennies = 1 dollar... Does 6 *$1.00.00 "one dollar and zero cents" mean $6.00.00 ?? six dollars and zero cents? "There is a very good reason i added the extra dot" And I know Members Are Not Going To Like It. The currency is a chosen system, but numbers are numbers??
  4. Is this as 2 pennies plus 6 pennies is 8 pennies?? could we also say 6/2 = 3 pennies Does this mean that all 3 pennies are1/2 * 6 pennies = smaller pennies? Im totally confused..
  5. I see spelling errors all the time, as im sure do others...Why are you polluting my OP with this?? Please stop making it look as though "anyone" can join the goodole science team, it don't work like that. Its more than "obvious" this science forum "LIES" and tries very hard to make "thinkers" feel stupid or try attacking the ego by noticing "spelling" errors or other "non important" points to diverge from truly saying.. Sorry we dont know the answer to your question... I know other members read this and dont comment for fear of getting bad reputations... Can you state the reasons again?? Why the super positions did not last for long?
  6. That can be re-assembled using roots...1/2 3/12 = 0.25 is as easy as 4/16 =0.25 3/4*1/3=0.25 Notice how 3/4 controls 1/3 =0.333...------> infinity.. "Through base 10 "obviously." As 0.25*16=4*3 = 12+3 = 15 *(2x) =30*(2x)= 60 There is that minute you spoke of...lol 60/ [10* (3/12)^1/2] =12 12-3= 3^2+1 = """BASE 10"""" So a number between 0 and 1 "Uses Base 10"" "from what I see." ------->>>Is there a better way???
  7. Because "you dont know." Well, i was told angular momentum is quantized, so the system you speak of must be orbiting at some angle within some time frame.. I was also told that the energy of a photon is "quanta." 0.001% where did this come from??? How can you have more than 100% of anything??? I swear either the books i read are lieing are this science forum is lieing...
  8. Not at all....You make it sound as though nature has no underlining order, im almost insulted by this.. I guess this explains random prices.. What a unique system of permutations we have..lol
  9. """A number between 0 and 1""" I'm getting this right out of """text books"" This is why i dont like to Google information and may explain confusions.. Proper fraction larger number on top smaller number on bottom. Improper fraction is this thing in reverse. So then, a number between 0 and 1 must be "a base?" I dont need to define anything, you either know or you dont... Do you know?? Yes or No?? Sounds like a product to me, not a number..
  10. My assertions comes from limited information by scientist and their books on it, of which I've spent $100.00s on... They should say y = x^2 is circular or "frequency based." that y' = 2x is "distance based" or "intrigal based." They should make note that our default base is 10.. They should say that calculus uses the "same rules" as geometry and not make it look vastly complex when in fact it's quite simpler than most imagine.... The issue im having is the "permiscuos" use to describe "the same thing." I did ask studiot what they meant.. Did you read it??
  11. I assumed at these levels we "all knew what you just mentioned "accept the strong gravity note" atleast for me."" Maybe I should be more specific..Thnx for letting me know.. studiot has already illuminated my question with some very good points about "coorporation" something the science community needs dire help on! I however would not jump so fast to judge my level of knowlwedge... It's just that when I read, tiny change in y over a tiny change in x, it makes me think "something in between" is shared and maybe that was what studiot "hinted" whom knows... ""I like the more simple approach I guess.."" If science did not have BIG GAPS, I would not be so confused on my so called "un-related facts" because they work just as good at marginal levels outside of the more theoretical guidance of "ideas." "But I do get what your saying."
  12. Do Vertual Particles "Only" Superimpose? And how likely could this idea be modeled in a "Macro" Phiscal Reality "General Relativity" example, and serve as some use in our modern understanding of nature's realms?
  13. ""You Seriously Need To Be Jocking""" The premise of my question deals on the "Reconciliation" of Gravity "Macro" and General Relativity "Macro." Thanks for pointing this out, because I was under the assumption that this "could never" be visually scene...But for the most part it appears to be atomic based "unless there is more info in other discoveries." I'm glad im actually getting "positive results" thnks so much for this link.. I've seen similar videos but get very uttered with the narration and connection to my OP.. Very "Impressive Explanation!!!" Best I've heard in all my studies!!! My insight leads me thinking that... Particles have a "choice" they can either work together or not, in effect of this "union" they effect the physical world?? Particle Wave, rings that bell.. Is this what you mean?? Also, you mention effects """restricted only""" on a "minute" part of large macroscopic objects due to transitions "quantum of energy." "Sounds Like Limits dy/dx" to me But is this minute 60*60 = 1 minute? Sounds circular to me, ie angular momentum obviously.. This Minute...Earth time? Space Time? How do you put an atom in a super position?? And to point it out, are the atoms "vertual copies" of itself?? As in the elephant scenario?? If this is the case, "I'm so surprised" the science community hasn't figured it out yet, or may have already! Read exactually what you just said..🤣
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.