Sensei

f.e. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oil_drop_experiment "This remains controversial since papers found after Fletcher's death describe events in which Millikan coerced Fletcher into relinquishing authorship as a condition for receiving his PhD.[3][4] In return, Millikan used his influence in support of Fletcher's career at Bell Labs." If such things happens between knowing each other teacher and student, you can imagine situation between famous professor versus "nobody".. How about Newton vs Hooke? They were claiming each other stole their ideas. In older times when the only way of communication was paper mail, XVI-XIX century, one scientist were sending two mails, to his opponent and second copy to himself (and never open), proving that ideas were really sent to person at certain time. Just in case.. Chriss, I doubt you hypothesis have any meaningful value, worth keeping in secret. It's not design of f.e. engine, that you could patent and make money on it..

Maybe it's IQ per race, or IQ per sex.. etc. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_and_intelligence But first he has to get database, to analyze it, and verify whether hypothesis is confirmed or overthrow. It would be unprofessional to reveal hypothesis, without even analyze any data, don't you think?

Why having a child is such freaking tragedy.. ? "Unlucky"?! I think it's great to have kids. Somebody would love to have kids but cannot.

Does it help? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overpotential https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrocatalyst

Actually, it could be also interpreted as their attitude for "running for money" (or "running for power" for politics, or "running for famous" for artists etc).. First group is very horny for money, therefor work hard to be successful (greedy for money/power/famous/etc). You would verify their attitude by telling the first and second group that they will not get any reward for what they do, and see what happens... To which group you would classify monks, hermits?

People need jobs tasks to do. To fill their time, and life. The better quality tasks, the more valuable for community, the better. Jobless person, in capitalistic country, desperately needing money, probably will be all happy to get f.e. warehouseman job, picker job etc. When such stultifying jobs, could be done by robots quite efficiently. Amazon warehouse robots https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=quWFjS3Ci7A It's hard to find people good, valuable tasks. It has all start in primary school, college, and university (or lack of them). Kids since their early days are split to better one, having money for good education, and worser, not being able even to send kids to college. And their parents every day are struggling with life, because of lack of money. "Bankrupting" every week. All because of money, in capitalistic country, constant run for money.. That's nothing else than bits on computer disks. Do you run for virtual credits in games? I don't think so. If one would run "script" to add each bank's account owner +1 bln usd, the next day, every body would quit their jobs.. And whole economy would collapse. People should have such jobs that even after receiving their +1 bln usd, they would go to their jobs, the next day. They should love their jobs, not because they get money for it. When it's done, there is no need for money anymore, as everybody do their responsibilities, without being forced to do them. Producers are terrified by 3D printers. One could model anything on computer, and press button, and thing which they would normally have to go and buy in shop, is done within minutes. If everybody would have 3D printer in home, the most of producers would bankrupt, or have to switch to making highly sophisticated products, above range of 3D printers. Making even more jobless low educated people, that are hired now to press buttons in the real extruder, packing, advertising, selling. But 3D printers producers would be improving their products, to higher resolutions, to limitless materials used for printing etc. One could even make 3D printer next gen, with 3D printer older gen, at home.. ps. That's just ramble about capitalistic country approach, rather than socialism..

No it wouldn't. The difference in mass from losing or adding an electron or two, as JC points out, is tiny. Where did you get this "one or two electrons"? On one side we have F=qE on other side we have F=mg For q=e=1.602176565*10^-19 C (one mentioned by you electron) mg=eE / e E=mg/e for m=10 mg (I am guessing.. what mass might have single oil drop?) so E=10^-5 kg * 9.81 m/s^2 / 1.602176565*10^-19 C = 6.1229*10^14 V/m Don't you think so it's quite too much? The more ionized atoms (the larger q in equation), by x-ray, the smaller electric field needed to cancel out gravitational force. While performing experiment, it can't ionize all medium between electrodes. It would ruin experiment, discharge electrodes. Reasonable workable voltage is probably around a few thousands volts between plates. Adjust q for it. Going back to the main subject. How about this one: if electron mass would not contribute to gravitation, then unstable isotopes decaying by beta decay plus, double beta decay plus, beta decay minus, double beta decay minus, prior decay mass of atom contribute to overall mass of Earth, and failing object, and after decay would not, making Earth, or object less massive than prior decay?! IMHO absurd. Either prior decay and after decay mass of Earth, or other object remain the same, unless electron (or other particle) escape it (like (anti)neutrinos).

Not exactly. Oil drop experiment, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oil_drop_experiment ionize oil drop, rip off electrons from oil drop, get rid of them. If you have oil drop prior ripping off its electrons, having the same gravitational mass, as after ripping off, it would be revealed in this experiment. Why do you mention G being different.. ? If gravitational mass is changed, it must be changed for either object failing down, and mass of Earth, at the same time. G constant is not affected. F=G*m*M/r^2 after subtracting some mass from either m, and M, G could (should) remain the same.

I didn't read whole thread, so sorry if it's been already said, but if f.e. electrons would not be accounted in gravity then all calcs are going to be invalid, including mass of Earth.. Take for example mass of Iron-56 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotopes_of_iron It has mass 55.9349375 u = 9.28821407766474E-026 kg In electric neutral state, it has 26 electrons, each with mass-energy around 510998.928 eV/c^2 (ignoring energy needed to release free electron) 26 * 510998.928 * 1.602176565e-19 / 299792458^2 = 2.36843955843932E-029 kg 2.36843955843932E-029 kg / 9.28821407766474E-026 kg = 0.0002549941 0.0255% of mass of Iron are it's electrons. In Hydrogen it's 0.05446% For single atom, it's not huge difference, but for mass of Earth it's really huge difference. As it would be 1.5e+21 kg difference.. Average m^3 of Earth is 5505 kg or so, 0.0255% from it, is 1.4 kg.

If you're issuing patent to office you should have ready device showing how it works in practice. So? Do you have device? Did you tested it? Show on YouTube video for instance.. IMHO you don't even did research with electroscope.. You would see that "stationary charges" are stationary in very specific moments.

You should always mention which relativity: whether it's special relativity or general relativity. In the article they said about special relativity. You truncated it to just "relativity". Special relativity is all the time used while calculating f.e. high energy particles collisions, and decay of unstable isotopes inside of Cloud Chamber, Bubble Chambers, or other particle detectors. So newly produced particles, daughter isotope, and f.e. electron, positron, proton, neutron, alpha, etc. there is used special relativity to calculate their energies and momentum. So amount of direct evidence in front of eyes is tremendous. One could argue 'what is mass', 'what is energy' etc. But equations from decays agree to 1 per billion precision or so. Special relativity also conserve mass-energy to every "piece", (f.e. photon energy prior pair-production = electron mass-energy + kinetic energy of electron + positron mass-energy + kinetic energy of positron), regardless of FoR, while GR and BB do not. Universal time does not disagree with special relativity, when calcs are done with mass-energy. There is no sensible way to determine 'universal time', as there is no reliable reference points (f.e. always immobile) in the Universe.

That should be banned! It's mistreat with cruelty poor chimp..

No. It's what I called 'tick', in my simplified example algorithm in post #3. Periodical update of all cells to new state. And to simulate various speeds, there are counter and timer variables. For photon-like particles timer would be 1. So they run at full speed, while others run slower.

Red Pepper Plantation, 309 plants at once. I moved them from old container (it was permanently dry) to seedling trays. There is more of them (331 so far), but didn't manage to get on board of seedling trays..

If Planck Length (L) (or any other length unit) is going to be "elementary" length. That's how far is one cell from the other. And Planck Time (T) (or any other time unit) is going to be "elementary" time. That's it, no fraction of it allowed, only positive integers. (quantization of length and time) Then macro scale velocities should be quantized in similar way: [math]v=\frac{L*x}{T},x=integer[/math] (in this case velocity is also integer quantized) or [math]v=\frac{L}{T*x},x=integer[/math] (in this case velocity is not integer quantized) With L and T, normalized to 1, x is the only variable. It's very easy to write algorithm for something like this, but describing it mathematically? Imagine you've array (2d) of cells, class Cell { private: bool particle; // true if cell is filled, false if empty // some other properties, like charge, mass? int x,y; // location in array int vx,vy; // where particle should go in the next time (x,y,vx,vy could be floats) int counter,timer; }; Cell cells[ 100 ][ 100 ]; Now for each time, for each non-empty cell in array, counter is decreased by 1. And if it reaches 0, particle swaps content with the one at cells[x+vx][y+vy], and counter=timer again. There is also needed collision detection. If that cell is non-empty, there is hit, and new vx,vy are needed to recalculate, and/or annihilation, and/or absorption etc. etc. If timer=1, cells are swapped/collision-tested the most often (the largest "velocity"). How about algorithm generating waves? It has the same begin as above. We have array of cells. But they have the only parameter: amplitude. For every time tick, for every row, every column (for 2d array) amplitude of cell is decreased by f.e. 8 (or some other variable), then surrounding it cells get +1 (because in 2d, 3x3-1=8) (in the case of using different variable than 8, then decreased by variable/8 "conservation of energy-momentum"). There is needed to write to spare array (so same cell is not subtracted/incremented multiple time, different row/column process), and swap them every tick. When you will start with central cell with f.e. 100, you will see waves spreading similar like in the real world. And you have wave effect, without any movement.. Sum of all cells will remain 100 regardless for how many cells it'll be spreaded.

Maybe this will help a bit: http://honeybeesuite.com/do-brussels-sprouts-need-pollination/ See also Rusty msg in comments. OTOH, they have edible buds. From my language wiki: "Brussels sprouts can not proceed after the other cruciferous vegetables, cucumbers and pumpkins." There are plants that can self pollinate, other needs bees, and exchange with other plants on plantation, yet another different kind of insects. If you have just "male" plants, or all "female" plants, they won't be able to reproduce. Unless they have either one on single plant, or switch sex. It's better described here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plant_reproductive_morphology "Like Amborella, some plants undergo sex-switching. For example, Arisaema triphyllum (Jack-in-the-pulpit) expresses sexual differences at different stages of growth: smaller plants produce all or mostly male flowers; as plants grow larger over the years the male flowers are replaced by more female flowers on the same plant. Arisaema triphyllum thus covers a multitude of sexual conditions in its lifetime: nonsexual juvenile plants, young plants that are all male, larger plants with a mix of both male and female flowers, and large plants that have mostly female flowers.[15] Other plant populations have plants that produce more male flowers early in the year and as plants bloom later in the growing season they produce more female flowers.[citation needed]" Green house could make harder bees and insects to get in, if plant requires them.

No, you're not right. Pair production is well known since at least 1948. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pair_production Energy from decay, is simply kinetic energy of outgoing newly produced particles. If you have Beryllium-8, it decays quickly to two alphas for instance. [latex]_4^8Be \rightarrow _2^4He + _2^4He + 91.84 keV[/latex] Decay energy is split in half to each newly created alpha (Helium nucleus), as they have equal mass, so they will carry the same momentum, and same kinetic energy. Just in opposite directions.

In this video, showing the basic electromagnetic induction, source of energy, initial acceleration comes from gravity: See how slowly magnet is passing through Copper pipe, in the second part of video. It's three-four times as long as not magnetized piece of Bronze.

Cosmic space is way more destructive environment, than Earth's conditions. Space crafts look like Switzerland's cheese under electron microscope due to constant bombardment of it, and passing through entire body of rocket, relativistic accelerated cosmic rays.. If you're on orbit, and close eyes, you will see white dots. Rays pass through spaceship, and hit eye. Similar like CRT TV is generating image, by electrons hitting screen, after being ejected by electron gun, but with much higher energies. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmic_ray_visual_phenomena

Microwave oven is filled with air, and air is Nitrogen 78% and 21% Oxygen.. ~1% other gases. While ionization of air, obviously there are produced NO, NO2, N2O, O3.

The first lemon tree that appeared from soil (in common container with Aronia), and was immediately moved to separate container with soil (to make room for others): Second lemon tree, moved today: See it's size! It's nearly double size of the first tree, even though it was 2nd in row. Third, the last one that appeared from soil, now is the biggest from the all of three, so far?! While moving it from soil, it appeared, that it's root is much bigger than overall plant on the surface. So, had to put it to coca-cola container instead what I planned originally, because would have to bend its root in literally circle.. Comparison between them on one image, so you can estimate their sizes: I was making "holes" in new lemon seeds (with needle, so they can drink water more easily), 20+ new one to put to the soil, and started mixing them with soil, and found out that old seeds released roots, some even to 5 cm, so far, perhaps weeks ago, stopped counting them at 7+, so I had to prepare space for them in Aronia container.. That's why all this movement of old plants to new containers.. Including these seeds which released roots, and plants on surface, I have totally 14 lemon trees so far. I will need to buy new 10L soil tomorrow, so their roots will be able to grow correctly.. ps. The all of them grew on artificial light source, 100 W light bulb.

Actually it looks kinda like sodium-potassium discharge tube by color.. One could use prism to split light by their wavelengths, and analyze their spectral lines.. According to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grape have plentiful of: Potassium 191 mg Magnesium 7 mg Calcium 10 mg Sodium 2 mg (in 100 g of product). What I would try is take some potassium/sodium/calcium/magnesium salts, to two (small) containers with water, solutions, and connect them by little strip of paper to make bridge between them. And put to microwave oven, and see what happens.

What is it? Show source code to generate it..

Say we have atoms that are not in ground state. If we send photon beam with right properties, which is enough to bump atom's electron to even higher energy level, than now, once electron go back to ground state, it can emit photon with even larger energy, than it absorbed from initial photon. Like in Hydrogen case, to visualize it. Suppose so it has n=2, transition from n=2 to n=3 require absorbing 13.6 eV / 4 - 13.6 eV / 9 = 1.8889 eV but then Hydrogen can go straight from n=3 to n=1 by emitting photon with 13.6 eV - 13.6 eV/9 = 12.08889 eV

Link you posted has no mention of Fluorine/Fluoride... Radioactive product of fission is Rubidium,Caesium,Strontium,Barium,Lanthanum. These are dissolve-able in water. Rb/Cs, pretty good, other weaker.