Sensei

1) You're not doubt very articulated person. Which suggest that you're rather humanist than logically thinking mathematician kind of people. 2) Showing that proprietary security system of particular company has been compromised, does not mean entire world suffer for this. After revealing vulnerability their authors had time to fix issues. In your ignorance, you're expanding that if some virus existed in the past, it must work everywhere, and forever. 3) You cannot send me any such packet as you claimed, because simply I don't use DHCP.. 4) Intercepting DNS servers, compromising router/modem, replacing DHCP settings, is the easiest way to get in, but it's easy only on paper (that you read about subject). You're making assumption that every body in network use DHCP. That's not always the case. Only ignorant use DHCP. And you need your own *DNS server* (if you're professional), made in C/C++, which will be nothing alike standard DNS server exe (or you simply will have no real time access to what somebody is searching). 5) My "challenges", as you called them, have to show that you just looked up terminology in the Internet, without having the real experience in subject. You refused to perform any of them, because it would reveal my assumption. 6) Challenge (again): which Windows API C/C++ function you have to use for installing key-logger on somebody machine.. ? 7) Making fake banking website is months of planning, testing, and you have to start from creating your own bank account, to see how it even looks like. And replicate every page, every functionality. Claiming it's fast and easy, is ridiculous. Every bank has different security. Intercepting bank login and password, will just show you what money somebody has on it. You won't be able to use them the most likely. There are needed temporary security codes etc. To see what money somebody has on bank account you dont have to get login and password, just search his/her mailing box for per month send bank statement.. Couple banks here is using codes send to mobile, generated during transfer attempt. User has to enter code send to mobile (proprietary app) inside of banking account website. Others have codes on scratch card. Even user has no idea what are they, until revealing code. Try to bypass it. But you have no real experience, so you miss the all details. Mythbusters security system compromise episode:

That's not possible. Each desktop PC and laptop is different. Different hardware, thus different drivers installed, and different software installed. In my apps I don't recall serious issues with different OS version, other than not being able to use unavailable functions (which means unable to even run app, with unresolved DLL entry (if they are static linked) ). There would have to be made one desktop, one laptop, one OS, for your words to be true (like in game console industry). Compatibility issues are inevitable as drivers manufacturers are not Microsoft usually. And even if they are MS, they are not one person that know everything. Corporations, are complete nightmare for anybody wanting to do with them, or to fix something in their software.. They have no bloody idea what they are doing (as they are thousands of people), who is doing, what is doing, lack of (or bad) communication, constant flow of employees, in and out. Nobody is forced nor encouraged to place their desktop software on Windows Store (unlike Apple Store for iPhone apps) Software that runs on PC, won't run on mobile phone. And vice versa. They wish to do. That's good only to Microsoft. There is no advantage for users. They wish everybody on the world have to pay them per-month.. For example, what security improvement do you have in mind? For example, what performance improvement do you have in mind? If there is 1 million of people suggesting something, vote of 1 of them has 1 per million "power", meaning it will the most likely be ignored. You have been working on Windows 10? Right. Then no surprise you advertise it.. I bet, if I will ask the basic question about programming Windows C/C++, you won't be able to answer.. Similar like with physics/quantum physics questions. Try f.e. booting up Amithlon on any Intel x86 1 GHz+ machine.. The faster CPU are build, the more lazy programmers become. Or companies hiring them, the less demanding.

The Angry Intellect, is there a thing that you *really* know? I bet, if I would ask you to write DNS server C/C++ code, you would not have idea where to start.. Show me how are you making TCP/IP tunnel in C++ for a start.. Building magnetic card reader should allow only as much characters as is needed. Which means sending entire source code is not possible. Some badly designed systems might exists, but are minority. As it's easy to spot issue. Jumping from building security system to intercepting DNS - ridiculous.

If Jupiter would be slightly further, or have smaller mass, smaller gravity, instead of belt of asteroids between Mars and Jupiter there could be formed yet another planet. It's not predestined that such planet won't appear in the future. Objects in cosmos come and go, some are intercepted, other ejected. Read f.e. about runaway stars and hyper velocity stars ejected by black holes: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stellar_kinematics#Runaway_stars If such object would fly through solar system, in the nicest scenario, planets would be ejected, and captured in the future by other star (ruining your 9 planet model). Current methods of detection of planets are working good with massive planets like Jupiter+, that are very close to their star (so it trembles a lot). These systems are nothing alike solar system. BTW, there is only one Solar system. The one with the only one Sun and Earth. Other planetary systems will have different names. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planetary_system

Movie or image is presented to group of people who are inside of MRI or other such device. Then from data from MRI computer algorithm is trying to figure out what people watched.

Once more time you show lack of knowledge in physics. Amperage without mentioning duration (time) is not enough data. You should ask "how long current should be flowing?". Then we would know, you know physics. If you have 10 kA, for 15 ns, how many electrons is it.. ? So far you are the one who has nothing to offer. Instead of answering questions proving you are knowledgeable, as you claimed, you preferred to refuse them. Simply because you have no idea what we are talking about.

Quote from your "blog": "I have done some personal experiments on myself over the years using different chemicals & TDCS (Trans-cranial Direct Current Stimulation)." Apparently at too small amperage.. Try 10 kA the next time.

Oh, really.. ? Then you should have no problem telling us what is energy released by decay of anti-matter anti-Carbon-13.. ?

To become f.e.CIA agent (or member of other national agencies) you need to pass through lie detector test, while to become president, you don't have to. Any spy can become president, while just extremely good one can be agent. Sorry, I could not resist, but find it quite ridiculous. Up-side-down situation. CIA agent has a more important position than president.. ? I don't think so these are crimes. In my sense of these words. Maybe I should use felony instead? Or even planned felony? Many politicians said in campaign, or interview, that they were f.e. smoking marijuana. And apparently it didn't influence their chance to being elected. Reverse, part of people thought, cool guy If politician drive a car, and hit other car, and there are people dead. In democratic country it ends up in instant political death.. But if he/she would hit and run, while there are dead (or hurt) people. Even if police would find car, he/she can refuse to be investigated by police (immunity) etc. I would like to know whether he/she did it or not.. I told you in previous post: fear from being detected during examination would filter out anybody who has something (serious) to hide. Tiny meaningless things don't need hiding. I completely understand resistance of politicians from this idea: they have many to hide..

Sorry for OT. That's correct, dear Phi. I would do it differently (as long as somebody know by himself/herself that he/she committed crime): - did you committed crime ever? yes/no - did you committed crime in 2015? yes/no - did you committed crime in December 2015? yes/no - did you committed crime in 20 December 2015? yes/no (then hour, minute, if such details are known, etc) Questions about location of crime. Country, city, street etc. Step by step. Not one single long, full of detail, question. Questions about year prior the one where happened something, can reveal other things from the past.. True story: girl killed her newly born baby, hide it, and then pretended it has been kidnapped. History get media attention. And private detective arrived and offered help for free. He secretly installed all members of family spying software in computers. And asked them to pass through lie detector the next day (so they have night for thinking about it). As he always do, in the all cases he is involved. She was in panic after info about examination. Everybody passed through without any problems and objections. Except girl. She refused to be examined. Obviously the rest family members were in shock that she refused. Her husband, mother-in-law, started pushing her "what really happened", "we know you are lying".. All day and night long. Detective found using his spying software, that day prior examining somebody searched net for "how to deceive lie detector?".. Family members knew they did not do it, and who did it (which laptop,at what hour,minute from spy log,which pages were visited prior and after), and pushed her to unbearable level.. Finally she told everything. And showed where body is hidden. Detector was not even needed. Just fear of being examined..

I didn't call JC liar. Not now, nor earlier. Private message discussion. Completely unrelated to this thread. Private means it should be keep known only to involved people, unless both parties agreed to reveal it. JC, has bad habit of bringing back private discussion to the main forum. What happened to English gentlemens? Extincted?

JC, you are mixing me with Studiot.. Even though we have both nickname starting from "S", we're different person.

Speed of sound of Hydrogen gas at room temperature is approximately 1300 m/s. PM me, I will tell you how to make experiment with it. There is experiment, that probably anybody who has access to dry ice, tried at least once in life. Paper boats, balloons or bubbles, floating in empty aquarium. You can make experiment how long something will float inside of aquarium with dry ice on the bottom and record by camera in timelapse mode. (on YT people are interested in effect, instead of measuring how fast/slow it will disappear) Same idea but with different heavier gas SF6

I think you should connect it to oscilloscope to have more useful/reliable data, with time in X axis, and voltage/current in Y axis.

What is wrong with evolution? How can he know it? Without all quantum physics/GR background really understood? Second time you're giving link to the same YouTube channel "Sentiology". Honestly I don't believe in accidents. Looks like you are just advertising YT channel.

Buy lie detector, plug it to yourself or your friends, and examine. Not cheap chinese toy, that started to appear on ebay, the latest one are based on analyze of which part of brain is utilized in while answering question - there is part of brain involved in making fantasies, that's active while making stuff up, Then you can speak about its effectiveness, from personal point of view experience. Until you have no personal experience, you should not talk about it. To not influence other people with this premade gibberish. Currently you are basically making stuff up (lie detector would show it right now ). Talking about thing you have no idea about. If somebody truly believe in "Earth is flat" and will be asked about it, obviously it will show examined person is telling truth. It's subjective truth, somebody belief. But if somebody who committed crime would be investigated, it would 99% show lie, if person would answered wrongly. Especially if it would be MRI lie detector Lie detector is not named "absolute truth detector" so don't pretend it to be such device. It's lie detector - detecting something reverse to truth. On purpose making stuff up. While I intended it to use for objective things like corruption, detecting crimes in the past, identification of terrorist, spy etc. Currently to prosecute somebody there are needed 1) witnesses 2) evidence (or or both at the same time). Witnesses can lie, evidences can be contrived. Chance that somebody lie to detector (and pass through) is less than 1%. I trust more lie detector than witnesses (that can lie, or misinterpret accident, not watching it from the start to end missing crucial parts of what happened), and evidence (that can be dissected/contrived). iNow, now calculate probability of happening all the things at the same time lie detector on victim is showing he/she saying true, lie detector on prosecuted person is showing he/she is saying true, and lie detector on police officers and all people involved in investigations also showing true.... There is work at reading people mind. People are put to MRI device. And there is showed image. Then MRI is reading brain activity. And making computer image from what person watched:

I can tell you why I would be bad US president: because I hate corruption, and whoever would to like to talk with me, would have to pass through lie detector in front of me, asking him/her about everything..... There is no person without sin, so it would reveal while investigation, by proper "person"...

Personally I do not share your amusement. I challenged you to at least isolate compound. And you failed. Your inability to isolate compound is so much amusing? Then I should have laugh first. Instead you preferred attacking me with copy and pasted text. 10 times in a row, about that "I am wrong" for every my argument. It was in PM, so I ignored it permanently. Do not you like my methodology? Then show yours. Where is problem? That you don't want to bother wasting weeks or months on research? Just because of what I want to do first-distillation (and the simplest thing from the all things to do next, taking a few minutes to few hours to check). I never said at which temperature and pressure, should be done distillation. You said you would try drying it (but the quickest drying is done by heating substance! To evaporate water). Drying at room temperature, of larger amount of juice, would take days if not weeks. Unless you use yet another substances that reacts with water (f.e.desiccants). (You complained by allegated heat decomposition of compound under higher temperature, now I can tell the same that used desiccants can cause reaction with substance, and have completely different result than expected (dehydration of solution)). (Yet another method is decreasing pressure with substance, so water boils at lower temperature, and get rid of it) So there is no reason to not try distill first, if you want to get rid of water. Especially under lower pressure. You would evaporate water, and check whether substance has lower or higher boiling temperature than water, and check whether substance is decomposing under higher temperatures. All-in-one set of informations. Quickly and without additional cost for desiccants. Have potato? Use them in the lab. And make photos in the middle of process. And have isolated product. And show on photos how it is used on windscreen after extraction. Your complained that potato specie can matter? Then ask Externet to send you couple kilos examples (which he undoubtedly checked).. ps. In 2015, I was doing 50 distillations per month.. >400 in whole year. Don't believe? 18-28 February 2015 http://www.scienceforums.net/topic/87953-distillation-results/ ps2. My the main question in PM was: how are you going to identify unknown compound in unknown solution (mixture of unknown compounds) using XIX century knowledge (lack of internet and literature, mass spectrometer etc.) to figure out compound chemical formula.. XIX century = inability to use mass spectrometer, etc. modern methods. You obviously ignored..

The first time I hear somebody measuring capacitors by volume they take.. I am/was using electrolytic 400/450 V capacitors (2.2 uF or so) to produce high voltage, in Cockcroft-Walton generator. Hundred of them in series. And they have size approximate 1 cm x 1 cm x 3 cm including board and wires and little space between them. In 1m3 could be packed 100^3 / 1x1x3 = 333k such capacitors. Their price per unit is (or "was", when I bought them), $0.125. So whole 1m3 of capacitors would cost $42k. I have seen people filling such capacitor arrays by oil (or mineral oil) to have good heat conduction (but damage of exploding capacitor in such environment is devastating) So what is the real quantity of your capacitor array? Anyway +1 Enthalpy.

Nonsense. It's good test as it's equal to everybody. Does not require to know any particular language or knowledge. Does not promote anybody. You cannot learn questions in advance and remember. As there is no questions just tasks to do. f.e. making math equation from couple provided numbers, to figure one next in chain. It's test "how good you are in thinking", unlike word based tests "how good you are in speeches/verbally". Don't you want to know whether president can think rationally without team of officials around him/her (they are writing him/her speeches for public).. ? Why there is so much discussion on speculation part of this forum? Because authors of these speculations, are good writers, good at speeches, but bad in thinking, and refuse to analyze data, make equation from data, and calculate. So what? "Close the all schools, because some teachers, 1 per million can be pedophile..." This is similar thinking like with refugees: don't allow them to enter country, because 1 per 10k might be terrorist. (The first thing, I would do with refugees from Middle east would be questioning him/her on lie detector) C'mon. Currently chance that somebody who is psychopath is becoming president are a lot higher, without any exams, than with exams mentioned above.. I would not pass any of such exam. Does it mean I would be bad US president? Without dictionary I would probably not know what particular question even means. One with good memory can learn the all questions in memory, and just look up them all in memory.

Yeah.. "What is your favorite color: white or black?" In true democracy, anybody can make their own party, gather people around it, and being chosen if their ideas are sensible to voting people. But their public spread ideas must reflect absolutely the true state. I would add to it two new tech things: - obligatory IQ test for the all politics and officers (public available video). - obligatory lie detector (video also) To get rid of corruption, stupidity, penetration by foreign nation agencies. Demagogic politics will be filtered out by lie detectors. As they must know their populist ideas are impossible to implement. Example anti-democratic tool is election threshold. Disallow minority parties to be elected because their percentage of votes is too small (like 5%-10%) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Election_threshold See who has 10% - Turkey... In USA you could easily set it up 40%, and nothing would change

You have cylinder (fill inside) or tube (hole inside)? If electrons will gather just on surface area, they should be spread quite evenly. Area of cylinder is area of top + area of bottom + area of sides: A=pi*r^2+pi*r^2+2pi*r*h Tube (hole inside) has much bigger area. With meaningless thickness, it has front side and back side.

Imagine you're in XVIII-XIX century, know nothing about chemistry,physics and science what we know now, and trying to find out what is made of some substance.. Searching and finding literature, is based on previously made research. I am just suggesting that research can be done by yourself. It's much more entertaining, and brain developing, than just looking up somebody else work and read.. It's like solving puzzle by yourself, versus letting somebody else do it for you..

Until performing experiment, good scientist should not make any assumptions. Did you try smearing potatoes on the windscreen to check how long it works, and measuring time.. ? I did not. I bet you didn't too. BTW, I checked what typical winter washer fluid, used on windscreen, is made of.. And it's mixture of methanol (even 30% v/v) and other alcohols. How about that, in the context of mentioned volatility... ? Receiving water from experimental distillation is also information for scientist: the most likely whatever is inside has higher boiling point than water. I don't see how that would help to determine molecular structure of compound? I am reminding you, OP is interested in identification of compound. Its chemical formula, molar mass, properties, etc.

True scientist would blend potatoes in blender, get juice, fill distillation flask, perform distillation, and try to gather larger amount of product(s) (for various boiling temperatures, refining). And observe how they reacts with various other known compounds. Probably a day of work or so, to figure out their molar masses at least. Density would be known after the initial or second distillation.