Speculations
Pseudoscientific or speculatory threads belong here.
The Speculations forum is provided for those who like to hypothesize new ideas in science. To enrich our discussions above the level of Wild Ass Guesswork (WAG) and give as much meaning as possible to such speculations, we do have some special rules to follow:
- Speculations must be backed up by evidence or some sort of proof. If your speculation is untestable, or you don't give us evidence (or a prediction that is testable), your thread will be moved to the Trash Can. If you expect any scientific input, you need to provide a case that science can measure.
- Be civil. As wrong as someone might be, there is no reason to insult them, and there's no reason to get angry if someone points out the flaws in your theory, either.
- Keep it in the Speculations forum. Don't try to use your pet theory to answer questions in the mainstream science forums, and don't hijack other threads to advertise your new theory.
The movement of a thread into (or out of) Speculations is ultimately at the discretion of moderators, and will be determined on a case by case basis.
6813 topics in this forum
-
Need to take my sandals off to count how many times someone's stated something along the lines of 'Thermal energy is the sum total of particle kinetic energy' or some such. The refutation is a work in progress. Please chip in if I get some of the maths wrong. Apologies for expanding tensor matrices out in full. It's the only way I can get my head around them.
-
0
Reputation Points
- 1 reply
- 431 views
- 1 follower
-
-
In terms of the "big freeze" predicted as the end of the universe.... It may not be the "end".... time may keep going.....
-
1
Reputation Points
- 55 replies
- 3.5k views
- 2 followers
-
-
Hi, Are the LHC and the FCC projects - really - secure. I have though been "investigating" these types of projects in the "layman" view of "security" since about 2003. Does it exist any sort of physics that to a 100% risk level makes such projects secure? /chron44
-
1
Reputation Points
- 20 replies
- 1.9k views
- 2 followers
-
-
Hi, all I’ve always wondered why Einstein struggled with the idea that geometry shouldn’t be a fixed stage, but something linked together with matter and energy. It has always felt real to me since I got more acquainted with physics - like spacetime is not a rigid container, but something that grows out of the universe’s own activity. /chron44
-
1
Reputation Points
- 82 replies
- 7.7k views
- 4 followers
-
-
With the help of reflection, I now have a different take on what I perceived at the time to be an idea. I tried to explain it as some of you will be aware & even show it's existence. I have described some things really bad, I didn't have the words or knowledge. My current view is this, I didn't have any sort of idea at all. I haven't discovered anything. I wonder if I've merely 'seen' something/s physics already has a theory or theories for & it is just extremely strange. I don't mean everything in the physics world, just an angstrom snippet if you will. For back up, I refer to my very first post in another thread: https://scienceforums.net/topic/134685-1-sub-qua…
-
2
Reputation Points
- 75 replies
- 9k views
- 4 followers
-
-
I’ve been exploring how geometry, mass, and gravity might have been applied in ways we don’t usually consider. The Mass Torque System is my attempt to model how small inputs can leverage large outputs through controlled torque and balance. In a simple demo, .23 oz of input force moves a 10.50 oz sled — a 4565% increase. I’m not claiming new energy is created, only that mechanical advantage can be harnessed in a novel way. Could principles like this have been used in ancient construction methods at sites such as Cusco, Baalbek, or Puma Punku? I’d like to open this up for discussion — do these mechanics resonate with known physics, or might they point toward overlooked appl…
-
1
Reputation Points
- 23 replies
- 2.9k views
- 3 followers
-
-
Been a while, and hope all are well. As this was where I started, I thought only fair I pop back and share where I have got to so far. (And sorry, most the math still goes over my head, though my concepts guiding it I see clearly). If you have the time (40min) and want to listen, I have put a link to the notebookLM audio for my Theory as it stands to date stored in my Google Drive. I have built the theory and math via Colab simulations and the combined help of AI. Mainly being Copilot, but also Gemini, Claude, Grok and ChatGPT. I have also created a Github account and Zonodo account where the theory is located. Github includes all simulations that you are free to use, tes…
-
0
Reputation Points
- 2 replies
- 752 views
- 1 follower
-
-
Hi everyone! I'd like to invite you to stress-test my custom AI link removed It is specifically trained on the WILL Relational Geometry open research publications https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19521296. This is a field test of the AI's epistemological awareness. I want this AI to be intellectually honest and not biased toward any specific physical model or philosophy - including the one it’s trained on. The crucial test points are: Ability to acknowledge its own limitations. Ability to admit it is wrong when unambiguous mathematical/physical evidence is presented. Staying strictly true to the source database without hallucinating. Correct formatting and contextual use…
-
2
Reputation Points
- 13 replies
- 2k views
- 4 followers
-
-
Have archaeologist found giant skeleton? I found this today.. Have archaeologist found giant skeleton? Were there giant people in the past? Many stories and myths talk about the Nephilim? But have archaeologist found giant skeleton?
-
1
Reputation Points
- 18 replies
- 2.1k views
- 1 follower
-
-
This post is for peer testing and discussion. I'm posting this to spark discussion – has anyone seen similar geometric approaches? Students, if you're learning relativity and frustrated with the math, try these derivations and let me know if they click. Test the code, replicate the algebra for other cases (like Mercury's orbit etc), and share your thoughts/results. Could this simplify teaching GR? All equations are purely algebraic and reproduce known results of Special and General Relativity exactly. Feedback on mathematical structure, reproducibility, and numerical testing is welcome. --- Abstract I’m an independent researcher working on a framework called WILL Relation…
-
3
Reputation Points
- 422 replies
- 40k views
- 5 followers
-
-
Greetings. A poor photocopy of photocopies with degraded readability; can A.I. in some sort of optical character recognition renew/retype text to a very readable condition ? What would be the "instruction/request/text" to ask A.I. to perform such on a image with text, or; giving A.I. a .pdf document ? Would it be something like "retype/reconstruct this document" attached ? (xxxxxxx.pdf) Example with NO interest in the context but on its reconstruction and readability: ---> Can anyone teach me how to do it ?
-
0
Reputation Points
- 2 replies
- 810 views
- 1 follower
-
-
According to research, the universe is expanding. We "know" this from observation. How does this work in practice? Is the universe expanding "in" to something? Or is the universe itself perpetually pushing a "boundary" ?
-
2
Reputation Points
- 95 replies
- 12.5k views
- 5 followers
-
-
All living beings, animals, aquatic animals, forest animals, quadrupeds have a heart in their bodies. The heart is the sun. The sun is the soul of the animals. The lower part of the shoulders of humans and animals is called the 'trunk'. It includes the female vagina, uterus, hands, feet, lungs. 'Mercury' means the 'trunk'. 'Venus' means the male sex organ. In man's body, 'trunk' means hands, feet, lungs, male sex organ.. 'Guru' (Jupiter ) means the part above the shoulders of humans. It includes the head, throat, neck, five sense organs (eyes, ears, nose, tongue and mouth). 'Mars' means the blood in the body of humans and animals. 'Saturn 1 ' means Ghost, the sleep and…
-
2
Reputation Points
- 22 replies
- 3k views
- 4 followers
-
-
Just about every work I've read on air acoustics (I've read a lot) starts by assuming constant sonic velocity. I sort of understand the reasons for this, but it simply isn't accurate. The peak of the pressure wave is hotter and the trough cooler due to compression/expansion and this does affect sonic velocity. I believe it's significant enough to be a major factor in eg. developing the characteristic timbres of wind instruments which nobody seems to have got a proper theoretical handle on yet. I've made a start on developing a mathematical system modelling a spherical wave accommodating a variable sonic velocity and attached a brief summary. I'd be most gratefu…
-
1
Reputation Points
- 48 replies
- 5.9k views
- 3 followers
-
-
A hypothesis is proposed to explain the anomalous clustering of the orbits of trans-Neptunian objects (TNOs) by the comet-like orbit of Planet 9 with an aphelion of ~500 AU and a semi-major axis of ~250 AU. Passing through the Kuiper Belt, Planet 9 chaotically interacts with TNOs, leading to alignment, anti-alignment, and scattering and a decrease in the period of their orbits. But at the same time, alignment creates a closer interaction, which ultimately accelerates scattering. Thus, TNOs whose arguments of perihelion as a result of scattering are grouped in an area at ~180° opposite to Planet 9 have more stable orbits due to a shorter interaction time. And the most stab…
-
0
Reputation Points
- 10 replies
- 1.6k views
- 2 followers
-
-
Lately I have been seeing numerous articles on right hand neutrinos contributing to dark matter. There are several different proposals. Those proposals involve whether or not neutrinos follow the terms of Dirac mass or Majorana mass https://arxiv.org/abs/2008.02110 here is a breakdown into singlets and doublets SU(2) \[{\small\begin{array}{|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|}\hline Field & \ell_L& \ell_R &v_L&U_L&d_L&U_R &D_R&\phi^+&\phi^0\\\hline T_3&- \frac{1}{2}&0&\frac{1}{2}&\frac{1}{2}&-\frac{1}{2}&0&0&\frac{1}{2}&-\frac{1}{2} \\\hline Y&-\frac{1}{2}&-1&-\frac{1}{2}&\frac{1}{6}&\frac{1}{6}…
-
1
Reputation Points
- 18 replies
- 2.3k views
- 2 followers
-
-
What I do I give it pdfs and a long instruction, and then ask questions. Best Service and Local LLMI use ChatGPT, should I switch to something else or something local ? Give AI access to screen, able Point-&-Ask while reading ? I saw video people doing similar things w/ Gemini, Claude. 1. I may use local OCR/CV and send it to LLM as text. 2. and use local Speech to text ? Should I give ChatGPT access to local files for this purposeLangChain - TechLinked - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9AXP7tCI9PI Local LLM Retraining, RAG, Context Docs - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fFgyOucIFuk How else can I use AI to study ?
-
2
Reputation Points
- 12 replies
- 1.7k views
- 4 followers
-
-
The following is based on the classic Kaluza model of 1919 plus some input from Wesson’s space-time-matter theory. The original ansatz gives totally wrong order of magnitude for particle properties, which, starting with Klein, led to attempts to combine the model with QM. I only refer to Kaluza without Klein. With minor modifications such a model, based on the concepts of differential geometry of GR only, is not only capable to describe particles but does so much better than the standard model of particle physics. It gives e.g. - a priori 12 elementary objects with charges corresponding to those of the “elementary” fermions of the SM; - mass & magnetic moments o…
-
1
Reputation Points
- 20 replies
- 5.5k views
- 1 follower
-
-
I am presenting this framework to determine if it has any merit or if it should be discarded due to fundamental logical flaws. I am looking for a 'go/no-go' critique based on the following axioms: 1. The Axiom of Time: Time is not a dimension, but a Processing Rate (Φ). Formula: dt=1/Φ In this view, 'time dilation' is a local reduction in the vacuum's update frequency due to high informational density (mass-energy). 2. The Invariance of c: The speed of light is the Maximum Processing Speed of the medium. An observer measures c as constant because the observer's own 'perception cycles' (biological or mechanical) are throttled by the same local Φ. Logic Check: Does this 'in…
-
0
Reputation Points
- 12 replies
- 1.4k views
- 2 followers
-
-
What is the cause of Probability amplitudes,coeffecients and wave function collapse in quantum mechanics...? I tend to think quantum mechanics is an emergent phenomenon...gaze from what ?...mmmm... consciousness!... I mean wave function collapse is not consciousness but a manifestation of consciousness. What do you think about that?
-
1
Reputation Points
- 26 replies
- 1.9k views
- 1 follower
-
-
We humans live in the present but we don't notice the present...what we perceive as the present is actually a mixture of past tenses In order to understand, some basic notions from classical physics must be recalled Color perception White light from the sun is partially reflected (a part is absorbed) from colored objects...for example, only yellow light is reflected from a yellow object while red, orange, green, blue, indigo and violet are absorbed by the yellow object . The time when the information reaches the eye is: t= distance divided by the speed of light An object at 10 m ...t=10 m /(300 000 000m/s) An object 1 mm away; t=0.001m/(300 000 000m/s) We …
-
2
Reputation Points
- 54 replies
- 8.4k views
- 3 followers
-
-
This work aims, first and foremost, to construct a falsifiable model of quantum gravity, seamlessly linked to low-energy experiments. — On the one hand, it derives the classical Newton–Maxwell–Einstein (GR) equations from a single "noisy" Hamiltonian on a discrete quantum graph, so it is essentially a candidate for a theory of quantum gravity. — On the other hand, it also incorporates the symmetries of the Standard Model (U(1)×SU(2)×SU(3)), the spontaneous breaking of these symmetries, and even predictions about the "shor anomaly" and microwave resonances in cryogenic qubits. Thus, this is not just "yet another" model of gravity, but a genuine attempt at a unified descrip…
-
0
Reputation Points
- 12 replies
- 1.5k views
- 3 followers
-
-
I can’t begin to understand how people could think this conspiracy theory was true https://gizmodo.com/no-earth-wont-lose-gravity-for-7-seconds-on-august-12-nasa-says-2000711970?fbclid=IwdGRjcAPcpGNleHRuA2FlbQIxMQBzcnRjBmFwcF9pZAo2NjI4NTY4Mzc5AAEehrTBUqGLZGFofgeantDjZutdIdMMTgKc9DcSJiTWwr-FCBs1DLQvLpEOmE0_aem_HrwYsNQzUCA1gDyknQ6IGg The claim: “In November 2024, a secret NASA document titled “Project Anchor” leaked online. The project’s budget is $89 billion, and its goal is to survive a 7-second gravitational anomaly expected on August 12, 2026, at 14:33 UTC [10:33 a.m. ET].” “The text went on to claim that the anomaly would result from the intersection of two gravitation…
-
1
Reputation Points
- 29 replies
- 4.4k views
- 3 followers
-
-
This thread will take me a considerable amount of time as I will be examining various treatments of BB nucleosynthesis and development of an eventual article of processes involved. for the initial stages I will simply be gathering the relevant formulas. Prior to symmetry Break Relevant equations The FLRW metric of the LCDM universe is used by the LCDM model of the Big bang to describe the evolution history of our Observable universe. The model starts at 10^{-43} seconds forward from a low entropy, hot dense state. One plausible explanation of how our universe began prior to that include quantum fluctuations. The model only describes our Observable portion as …
-
1
Reputation Points
- 73 replies
- 16.6k views
-
-
Where do you see the future of medicine going in 20 years from now? In 20 years from now what will future of medicine be like? I’m wondering in 20 years from now what will medicine be like? I read some thing about gene editing?
-
0
Reputation Points
- 7 replies
- 964 views
- 1 follower
-