Speculations
Pseudoscientific or speculatory threads belong here.
The Speculations forum is provided for those who like to hypothesize new ideas in science. To enrich our discussions above the level of Wild Ass Guesswork (WAG) and give as much meaning as possible to such speculations, we do have some special rules to follow:
- Speculations must be backed up by evidence or some sort of proof. If your speculation is untestable, or you don't give us evidence (or a prediction that is testable), your thread will be moved to the Trash Can. If you expect any scientific input, you need to provide a case that science can measure.
- Be civil. As wrong as someone might be, there is no reason to insult them, and there's no reason to get angry if someone points out the flaws in your theory, either.
- Keep it in the Speculations forum. Don't try to use your pet theory to answer questions in the mainstream science forums, and don't hijack other threads to advertise your new theory.
The movement of a thread into (or out of) Speculations is ultimately at the discretion of moderators, and will be determined on a case by case basis.
6782 topics in this forum
-
This theory will certainly require the reader to think differently. It will also stretch the normal perception of time and size. I am putting this forward in the hopes that greater minds than myself will be able to advance the discussion – to one end or another. Abstract Theory: The Living Universe – A Call for the Merging of the Fields of Astronomy and Biology By: Christopher Wingfield This theory first began to take shape as I attempted to visualize an atom in my mind. As I thought about the seemingly endless power and light of a nucleus, the only image that kept re-occurring to me was that of our sun. I took it one step further, and I started to imagine the sun as if…
-
0
Reputation Points
- 29 replies
- 4.8k views
- 2 followers
-
-
According to the current nuclear models, the even-even nuclei must have two sort of shapes: A- Spherical shape – when the quantity of prótons Z is the same of the quantity of neutrons N, Z=N. B- Elispoidal shape – when Z << N . But experiments have shown that some even-even nuclei with Z<< N are pear shaped. Then, how to justify it? After all, they would have to have an ellipsoidal shape. In 2013 the Professor Peter Butler of the University of Liverpool had proposed that nucleons (prótons and neutrons) are distributed within the nuclei around a z-axis. So, in order to justify why some even-even with Z<<N (as for instance 88Ra224) have pear shape, he…
-
0
Reputation Points
- 3 replies
- 2.2k views
- 1 follower
-
-
0 1 1 2 3 5 8 3 4 5 6 7 9 9 5 The above is how the Fibinacci Sequence decoded from Pi 3.1415626534897 and how they connect the dimensions. Full explanations in the video.... The above is the first step I am working on the next step. It looks like it is going to show me the order of number ranking... One Step at a time...
-
0
Reputation Points
- 0 replies
- 923 views
-
-
GOOD BRAIN EXERCISE: This is first draft of idea it is Long and enjoy...share I completely agree with everyone. If you break everything down to electro/magnetic energy then we can solve pretty much everyone's question above. Keep it simple and define energy with a plus (+) or minus (-) and have opposite signs attract like a magnet. Then we will imagine an infinite number of Cube stacked sided to side top to bottom and back to front Like xyz coordinates but no definition is needed. This is suppose to be three dimensional but for explanation sake I will keep it 2d. So with this setup we would apply a single point of energy which would radiate a positive to a negativ…
-
0
Reputation Points
- 4 replies
- 1.5k views
-
-
Why are there so many guests here "just browsing" hella old posts.....?
-
0
Reputation Points
- 2 replies
- 862 views
- 1 follower
-
-
What follows is virtually unthinkable. Some will call it gibberish--the work of a crank. It can only be imagined from outside of our current agreement about the nature of reality. Those who understand one or more of the following five claims may have a better chance at taking it in. [link removed]
-
0
Reputation Points
- 1 reply
- 780 views
- 1 follower
-
-
How did it start? I would assume from a language of gestures then recognized sound and tone evoked into different increments of emitted noise? How many words are there in each language? How many words, hard question to ask but does anybody have a good estimate? How many different utterances of noise are their in each language? How complex, or difference in utterance of noise patterns are there? How many more words and utterances are there now compared to from where spoken language first arrised? What were the first words? I'm guessing hunting and labeling environment? Where did it stem from there? I'm gatheric information to see just how muc…
-
0
Reputation Points
- 26 replies
- 4.5k views
-
-
Hi everybody, I have been doing research on "analogy of fluid mediums and sub-atomic particles" for a long time. In this context, I examined the behavior of super fluid mediums and vortex, and I compared the behavior of subatomic particles. As a result of my research, I saw an immense analogy between them. Besides, Einstein was thinking, fields could intensify at a certain point, through a kind of knotting. and knot can behave like a particle. Briefly, the particles can be obtained from fields. This knots are called as soliton. I supposed the fields of Einstein as super fluid medium. And knotted field as vortex. I got very interesting results. I noticed that fluid med…
-
0
Reputation Points
- 24 replies
- 3.8k views
-
-
I was traversing the waters of the deep, where I ran across these words upon the masters desk. "Time and space kneel down before me while beasts in darkness prey." I asked, what do they mean? and he replied, "Post them and let's see".
-
0
Reputation Points
- 0 replies
- 948 views
-
-
The universe we live in determines how many dimensions we exist in. If we live in a ten dimensional universe, we must be 10 dimensional beings. However, the length we would extend into the higher dimensions would be minimal. For example, a 2 dimensional creature residing in a 3 dimensional universe would have a length, width, and if you looked closely a small height. It would be similar to a piece of paper. The length and width of the paper are easily measurable, while the height would be extremely small and not easily measurable. If the paper had only a length, width, and no height, it would not exist in a 3 dimensional universe. Therefore, if we live in a unive…
-
0
Reputation Points
- 4 replies
- 2.5k views
- 1 follower
-
-
It is a big problem facing physics – how to theoretically explain the fact that Universe expands with acceleration. In our article we try to explain this effect with the simple fact: the more distant the star is, the earlier light which came from this star began its travel. And at the earlier moments of time the expansion of the Universe was faster. The numerical calculations give quite good approximation of the universe radius acceleration rate – see Part 4. We also try to build a quantum gravity model of the Universe, amazingly we see there, that if the Big Bang was in the beginning of the Universe, and the matter was in point initially, then we have the contradicti…
-
0
Reputation Points
- 5 replies
- 1.3k views
- 1 follower
-
-
We are a research team was able to detect large allows Ptkhals of the dilemma has always been a major problem in physics Gravity repellent: It is a very modern technology that allows creating a field where gravity equal to zero (Nthvd on some of the details), where this technique would eliminate a very large cost was caused by gravity And truth be said of our country first, but in such a difficult time of life In the event that gave us a view from the outside can not refuse, knowing that we did not leave the door only Triqnah In the last wait you advice and guidance, thank you email deleted by mod
-
0
Reputation Points
- 5 replies
- 1.4k views
-
-
I went further with my research (long work) and i was wondering to share some notes here to give more insight to others. I must admit i made a mistake with the holographic principle in a sense while is explains entropy and interactions there is a much deeper foundation we must involve for precise mapping. eventually everything fits together. in a very brief concept: everything is emergent.gravity,space,time ,geometry everything. its consequence of dynamic non local wave fluctuations. past is magnetic memory of the wave function future is the probability of the wave cycle/rate. the electron states are in fact different electron existence of wave form.since …
-
0
Reputation Points
- 4 replies
- 1.5k views
-
-
An alternative hypothesis to explain the observation of 'the expanding universe' following Hubble's Law First of all, I want to say that this is a hypothesis of mine. It's a result of long thinking, but that's not an argument at all of course. Please be not too hostile, when you destroy it :wink:(with arguments). Thank you. Some true premisses: Observations of time and space are always relative (referenceframe dependent) Space and time are like two sides of a coin: when we observe a distortion of space, we must observe a distortion of time and vice versa. (spacetime is one united entity) For example: when we observe a spaceshrink of a hypothesised…
-
0
Reputation Points
- 9 replies
- 1.8k views
-
-
This is my first post on a fairly complex theory I've been working on. Many people believe that reality is in itself the nature in which one defines it's own relative possition within a defined state. Much of this is comprised of the use of sensory interpretation, and that which is expressed by other beings inhabbiting said defined state. However, the topic is much more complex in nature then you may assume. Now we could get into a philosophical discussion about the idea of "knowledge" here, but i digress. In my working theory, I have incorperated "common knowledge" laws in order to further analyse the topic at hand. By "common knowledge" I refer to widely ac…
-
0
Reputation Points
- 6 replies
- 1.4k views
- 1 follower
-
-
I have a new theory for calculating the coefficient of kinetic friction. The equation is: μk=sin(θavg)sin(Φavg) Where θavg is the average of the angles each part of the first surface makes, Φavg is the same but for the second surface. This makes the force of friction be: Ffric=μkFN=sin(θavg)sin(Φavg)Fn Where Fn is the normal force. To find the average angle, you would need a graph to show all the angles and find the average. I made the equation for my theory μk=sin(θavg)sin(Φavg) because you have different parts of the two surfaces pressing against each other, and this makes a force that acts against the velocity. That's friction. The rougher the sur…
-
0
Reputation Points
- 109 replies
- 14.5k views
- 2 followers
-
-
The general assumption is that at the quantum level, atoms lack a defined shape beyond their nucleus, and thus can only be represented by a probability-based "electron cloud." In point of fact, there is overwhelming evidence that (1) each element in the periodic table has a permanent, defined shape; (2) that the variations in atomic design are standardized from one element to the next; and (3) that the overall shape of an element controls the majority of the atom's properties. Instead of trying to fill this post with too much detail. I will just point you to the website created for purposes of describing and displaying 3D models of various elements. The websit…
-
0
Reputation Points
- 5 replies
- 1.3k views
- 1 follower
-
-
Teleportation is transporting an object from place to place without traveling through normal space. So if you transport an object through a brick wall to the other side, that's teleportation. Since it doesn't travel through normal space, it should take 0 time. If you attach a teleport device to a spaceship, you should be able to jump from place to place in the universe, and it should take 0 time, just like in Isaac Asimov's book, 'The Stars, Like Dust'.
-
0
Reputation Points
- 5 replies
- 1.4k views
-
-
There is an unexamined assumption in mathematical physics about the location of the observer, the physicist--the mind that is constructing the model. Exponential expansion, for example, assumes a location for the observer that is measuring this phenomenon. The following offers a possible location for the observer in complex space. (Electromagnetic, quantum and relativistic phenomena require complex space.) Imagine that the key to the architecture of light is Euler's famous formula e^(ix) + 1 = 0 The real number line is a mean between the complex exponential function and the second derivative of the imaginary logarithm (the inverse of the complex exponential function). …
-
0
Reputation Points
- 10 replies
- 1.6k views
- 1 follower
-
-
CONTROVERSIAL : FLAT universe ------- SPHERIC celestial objects I am sure that moderator will find nothing controversial in this thread. At first because it is not decisive sure that universe is flat. On the other hand we have well crafted scientific theory supported by accurate calculations and observation that flatness is result of immense dimension of universe where million of parsecs are like millimeters on earth surface. In my short lay-mans thought, modern cosmology and astrophysics has not solid arguments to support the “cause” of Big Bang theory, hermafrodit maner of reproduction of space from itself --- SO called inflation, “creation” of everything from nothing…
-
0
Reputation Points
- 6 replies
- 1.2k views
-
-
I have developed a proof (truth) that explains all phenomena. Do i go for mathematical studies or physics studies to develop skills to make it into a theory/proof/law?
-
0
Reputation Points
- 4 replies
- 1.2k views
- 1 follower
-
-
Light is emitted from processes that (as far as I know) involve a rapid reorganization of charged particles and this light is emitted into an environment that is full of other charged particles that will adapt to any changes in EM fields and by adapting will also cause 2y adaptations etc etc. Taking into account the speed of light,a reaction that would`ve lasted perhaps a picosecond would take a lot longer to be registered by an observer as i/it would take time for the particles in any detector to move in response to the field ii/ it would be impossible to separate the effect of the surroundings from the localized effects from the actual reaction.As the rest of the univer…
-
0
Reputation Points
- 8 replies
- 2.1k views
-
-
T=T0 R1/2c/(R1/2c - [2GM]1/2)
-
0
Reputation Points
- 17 replies
- 1.9k views
- 1 follower
-
-
I once had an experience of light as constituted by equal and opposite exponentials. The second derivative of the complex exponential function (-e^(ix)) and the second derivative of the complex logarithmic function (-i/z^2) seem to provide an analogy. i*ln''(z) = -i/z^2 (as the location of the observer, the model-maker, the measurer) provides the inverse square relationship that we attribute to gravity--"gravity" a function of perception, not force? (The Weber-Fechner Law and other evidence support the idea that all perception might be logarithmic.) It's crazy, I know--but it would eliminate the need for dark energy and dark matter. And a complex exponential "space…
-
0
Reputation Points
- 0 replies
- 1.3k views
-
-
Hello ALL "Shut up and calculate" (P.Dirac). But it can be stricly proved that Universe is a sub-set of fundamental Set “Information”, so we cam say now: "be calm and calculate" since "Nature laws" as well as mathematics at all are inherent to the information. - see http://arXiv.org/abs/physics/0703043 , V5 (and may be the first couple of pages in V1). Some analogs, i.e. the conjectures that Universe is some "ensemble" – see, e.g., "the Everything list" http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list/about including the papers: "A Computer Scientist's View of Life, the Universe, and Everything", Juergen Schmidhuber; "Is "the theory of everything'' …
-
0
Reputation Points
- 70 replies
- 21.3k views
- 2 followers
-