Speculations

Value 0.999... Non-system( infinite ) and non-integral aka the mathematiclly 'perfect', circle. In this 'perfect' sense, we do not have a finite set of 360 degrees, rather we have an iinfinite set of degrees 0.{n}.....and never resolving it self as complete, 2D whole. A similarly rational, logical and common sense thought process, applies also to a 3D sphere. ----the illusionary(?)----line-of-demarcation-------- Value 1.0 = Systemic( finite ) Integral The minimal, systemically integral, 3D( XYZ ) value 1 point, is a a finite tetra(4)hedron. The minimal, systemically integral, 2D value 1, is a finite, subdivided tri(3)angle, with a central( nucleated) nodal vertexial …

IF the material universe was described by the various algorithms of maths within the confinement of the singularity, and the release (big bang) of this information was permitted with the creation of space by the dimensions, what if any shape of existing space would be discernible by an extrapolation how of these dimensions were expressed? If the dimensions were the first information expressed outside the singularity, it seems logical that they were expressed in a particular order of simpler to more complex. That order being: First the X axis, or the first appearance of a line of (theoretical) primordial energy with an intersection at the singularity, then the second be…

Do two stationary magnets, opposing or attracting, generate an electrical reaction at the field intersection? It wouldn't need to be a strong magnet to test this. Assuming yes Could a conductive filament of a certain design, magnetic property, element, alloy or combination convert it into a current? Would the current produced be a factor of the kinetic potential, magnetic field strength, nither or both?

If I make a statement "half the humans that lived to be 50 years old are alive today, and the other half are deceased" I am most likely off one way or another. 1. On which side am I off? 2. What age should I replace "50 years old" with, to make the statement correct?

My theory is that the multiverse is moving faster than light, and its pulling all of the other universes with it to also move faster than light, but not nearly as fast as it self, so no universe within the multiverse can ever expand past the multiverse. If we had an object that was indestructible by relative physics, something that couldn't be destroyed, would we be able to tear a hole in space that could let us into the multiverse & travel faster than light. The multiverse is expanding, this expansion causes our universe to also expand, our universe is expanding faster than the speed of light. The multiverse is expanding faster than our universe, if you are able t…

Basis for how to build a "free energy" "overunity" motor-generator? I haven't checked every part, but I think this works as a basis for a self-running motor-generator. Electromagnets/coils/solenoids/inductors with different strengths as the magnets/electromagnets they pull defy the Lenz-law-following-Newton's-third-law-and-following-the-Law-of-Conservation-of-Energy. One line of wire powered by x watts makes y magnetism, enough to move a compass. But a coil of wire (solenoid/inductor/electromagnet/coil) of 100 or so turns makes enough magnetism to move a motor armature or a ceramic two-inch-by-one-inch-half-inch-deep magnet, while still using abou…

A new experiment published in 2012 had shown that 4Be12 has a structure impossible to be explained from the principles of current Nuclear Physics: End of the magic: Shell model for beryllium isotopes invalidated By considering the structure proposed by Dr. Wilfried Nörtershäuse it's impossible to explain the null magnetic moment for the nucleus 4Be12. Indeed, look at to the structure proposed: The neutrons n-1 and n-2 have an orbit radius longer than the orbit radius of the neutrons n-3 and n-4 , and therefore the g-factor for n-1 and n-2 is different of the g-factor for n-3 and n-4. Therefore the structure proposed by Dr. Wilfried Nörtershäuse is incompatible with t…

This theory will certainly require the reader to think differently. It will also stretch the normal perception of time and size. I am putting this forward in the hopes that greater minds than myself will be able to advance the discussion – to one end or another. Abstract Theory: The Living Universe – A Call for the Merging of the Fields of Astronomy and Biology By: Christopher Wingfield This theory first began to take shape as I attempted to visualize an atom in my mind. As I thought about the seemingly endless power and light of a nucleus, the only image that kept re-occurring to me was that of our sun. I took it one step further, and I started to imagine the sun as if…

According to the current nuclear models, the even-even nuclei must have two sort of shapes: A- Spherical shape – when the quantity of prótons Z is the same of the quantity of neutrons N, Z=N. B- Elispoidal shape – when Z << N . But experiments have shown that some even-even nuclei with Z<< N are pear shaped. Then, how to justify it? After all, they would have to have an ellipsoidal shape. In 2013 the Professor Peter Butler of the University of Liverpool had proposed that nucleons (prótons and neutrons) are distributed within the nuclei around a z-axis. So, in order to justify why some even-even with Z<<N (as for instance 88Ra224) have pear shape, he…

0 1 1 2 3 5 8 3 4 5 6 7 9 9 5 The above is how the Fibinacci Sequence decoded from Pi 3.1415626534897 and how they connect the dimensions. Full explanations in the video.... The above is the first step I am working on the next step. It looks like it is going to show me the order of number ranking... One Step at a time...

GOOD BRAIN EXERCISE: This is first draft of idea it is Long and enjoy...share I completely agree with everyone. If you break everything down to electro/magnetic energy then we can solve pretty much everyone's question above. Keep it simple and define energy with a plus (+) or minus (-) and have opposite signs attract like a magnet. Then we will imagine an infinite number of Cube stacked sided to side top to bottom and back to front Like xyz coordinates but no definition is needed. This is suppose to be three dimensional but for explanation sake I will keep it 2d. So with this setup we would apply a single point of energy which would radiate a positive to a negativ…

Why are there so many guests here "just browsing" hella old posts.....?

What follows is virtually unthinkable. Some will call it gibberish--the work of a crank. It can only be imagined from outside of our current agreement about the nature of reality. Those who understand one or more of the following five claims may have a better chance at taking it in. [link removed]

How did it start? I would assume from a language of gestures then recognized sound and tone evoked into different increments of emitted noise? How many words are there in each language? How many words, hard question to ask but does anybody have a good estimate? How many different utterances of noise are their in each language? How complex, or difference in utterance of noise patterns are there? How many more words and utterances are there now compared to from where spoken language first arrised? What were the first words? I'm guessing hunting and labeling environment? Where did it stem from there? I'm gatheric information to see just how muc…

Hi everybody, I have been doing research on "analogy of fluid mediums and sub-atomic particles" for a long time. In this context, I examined the behavior of super fluid mediums and vortex, and I compared the behavior of subatomic particles. As a result of my research, I saw an immense analogy between them. Besides, Einstein was thinking, fields could intensify at a certain point, through a kind of knotting. and knot can behave like a particle. Briefly, the particles can be obtained from fields. This knots are called as soliton. I supposed the fields of Einstein as super fluid medium. And knotted field as vortex. I got very interesting results. I noticed that fluid med…

I was traversing the waters of the deep, where I ran across these words upon the masters desk. "Time and space kneel down before me while beasts in darkness prey." I asked, what do they mean? and he replied, "Post them and let's see".

The universe we live in determines how many dimensions we exist in. If we live in a ten dimensional universe, we must be 10 dimensional beings. However, the length we would extend into the higher dimensions would be minimal. For example, a 2 dimensional creature residing in a 3 dimensional universe would have a length, width, and if you looked closely a small height. It would be similar to a piece of paper. The length and width of the paper are easily measurable, while the height would be extremely small and not easily measurable. If the paper had only a length, width, and no height, it would not exist in a 3 dimensional universe. Therefore, if we live in a unive…

It is a big problem facing physics – how to theoretically explain the fact that Universe expands with acceleration. In our article we try to explain this effect with the simple fact: the more distant the star is, the earlier light which came from this star began its travel. And at the earlier moments of time the expansion of the Universe was faster. The numerical calculations give quite good approximation of the universe radius acceleration rate – see Part 4. We also try to build a quantum gravity model of the Universe, amazingly we see there, that if the Big Bang was in the beginning of the Universe, and the matter was in point initially, then we have the contradicti…

We are a research team was able to detect large allows Ptkhals of the dilemma has always been a major problem in physics Gravity repellent: It is a very modern technology that allows creating a field where gravity equal to zero (Nthvd on some of the details), where this technique would eliminate a very large cost was caused by gravity And truth be said of our country first, but in such a difficult time of life In the event that gave us a view from the outside can not refuse, knowing that we did not leave the door only Triqnah In the last wait you advice and guidance, thank you email deleted by mod

I went further with my research (long work) and i was wondering to share some notes here to give more insight to others. I must admit i made a mistake with the holographic principle in a sense while is explains entropy and interactions there is a much deeper foundation we must involve for precise mapping. eventually everything fits together. in a very brief concept: everything is emergent.gravity,space,time ,geometry everything. its consequence of dynamic non local wave fluctuations. past is magnetic memory of the wave function future is the probability of the wave cycle/rate. the electron states are in fact different electron existence of wave form.since …

An alternative hypothesis to explain the observation of 'the expanding universe' following Hubble's Law First of all, I want to say that this is a hypothesis of mine. It's a result of long thinking, but that's not an argument at all of course. Please be not too hostile, when you destroy it :wink:(with arguments). Thank you. Some true premisses: Observations of time and space are always relative (referenceframe dependent) Space and time are like two sides of a coin: when we observe a distortion of space, we must observe a distortion of time and vice versa. (spacetime is one united entity) For example: when we observe a spaceshrink of a hypothesised…

This is my first post on a fairly complex theory I've been working on. Many people believe that reality is in itself the nature in which one defines it's own relative possition within a defined state. Much of this is comprised of the use of sensory interpretation, and that which is expressed by other beings inhabbiting said defined state. However, the topic is much more complex in nature then you may assume. Now we could get into a philosophical discussion about the idea of "knowledge" here, but i digress. In my working theory, I have incorperated "common knowledge" laws in order to further analyse the topic at hand. By "common knowledge" I refer to widely ac…

I have a new theory for calculating the coefficient of kinetic friction. The equation is: μk=sin(θavg)sin(Φavg) Where θavg is the average of the angles each part of the first surface makes, Φavg is the same but for the second surface. This makes the force of friction be: Ffric=μkFN=sin(θavg)sin(Φavg)Fn Where Fn is the normal force. To find the average angle, you would need a graph to show all the angles and find the average. I made the equation for my theory μk=sin(θavg)sin(Φavg) because you have different parts of the two surfaces pressing against each other, and this makes a force that acts against the velocity. That's friction. The rougher the sur…

The general assumption is that at the quantum level, atoms lack a defined shape beyond their nucleus, and thus can only be represented by a probability-based "electron cloud." In point of fact, there is overwhelming evidence that (1) each element in the periodic table has a permanent, defined shape; (2) that the variations in atomic design are standardized from one element to the next; and (3) that the overall shape of an element controls the majority of the atom's properties. Instead of trying to fill this post with too much detail. I will just point you to the website created for purposes of describing and displaying 3D models of various elements. The websit…

Teleportation is transporting an object from place to place without traveling through normal space. So if you transport an object through a brick wall to the other side, that's teleportation. Since it doesn't travel through normal space, it should take 0 time. If you attach a teleport device to a spaceship, you should be able to jump from place to place in the universe, and it should take 0 time, just like in Isaac Asimov's book, 'The Stars, Like Dust'.