all i can see, there is acceptance of community. I mean that this was too much effective which is also the wrong thing to me.

what I want to underline is that since there are "truths" and even though we scientists are successfull to find / find out those "truths" , they will exist and be effective.The difference will just be that we will not be able to use those truths. I mean that even though we get agreements on something the truths exist in every process regerdless our convention.

So, I wonder (and also should express my surprise that ) the reason why when some effective/known people says something, others follow without questioning.

Edited 1 hour ago1 hr by ahmet

3 minutes ago, ahmet said:

when some effective/known people says something, others follow without questioning.

This is not true.

10 minutes ago, ahmet said:

all i can see, there is acceptance of community. I mean that this was too much effective which is also the wrong thing to me.

what I want to underline is that since there are "truths" and even though we scientists are successfull to find / find out those "truths" , they will exist and be effective.The difference will just be that we will not be able to use those truths. I mean that even though we get agreements on something the truths exist in every process regerdless our convention.

So, I wonder (and also should express my surprise that ) the reason why when some effective/known people says something, others follow without questioning.

There are thing's that are true in science, the axioms; everything else is a temporary truth, or target for every scientist to shoot at.

20 minutes ago, ahmet said:

So, I wonder (and also should express my surprise that ) the reason why when some effective/known people says something, others follow without questioning.

Because they don't disagree with what they are saying. What they are saying is in line with the theoretical principles that are understood amongst the scientific community, at that point in time.