Jump to content

If humanity becomes extinct...?


seriously disabled

Recommended Posts

If humanity became extinct, will all the the scientific knowledge that we have obtained thus far in fields like biology, chemistry and physics be lost forever or will there be another species that will come after us that will also be capable of develping science?

Edited by seriously disabled
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I suppose it depends to some extent on why our species dies out. Assuming it is innate stupidity such as a nuclear war, rather than the planet becoming totally and irreversibly uninhabitable, there is no reason to see why another species can't be just as capable of science. They would have a head start if they could work out how to read all the knowledge we have recorded somewhere - archaeology would be even more interesting than it is today.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's possible something else will come after us, but it will most likely be starting from scratch. On the off chance that intelligence arises again on Earth, or close enough to find Earth in the window of time where it still exists, it's unlikely that it would learn anything from us, except possibly a few tricks from anything mechanical that is still in good enough shape to be useable, or at least point someone in the right direction as to its function.

 

Anything written or recorded is liable to be unreadable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If humanity became extinct, will all the the scientific knowledge that we have obtained thus far in fields like biology, chemistry and physics be lost forever or will there be another species that will come after us that will also be capable of develping science?

 

Of course, in both senses; if humans became extinct then human knowledge would also die; the frogs may come to the same conclusions, but it wouldn't be human knowledge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's possible something else will come after us, but it will most likely be starting from scratch.

 

 

Starting from scratch in a world where all the easy sources of fuel, petrochemicals, many metals, etc. have all been used up. So they may have a harder time developing some technologies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Which other species engage in science? We've only been doing it ourselves a few hundred years. Unless you're using a really loose definition of science?

When an animal educates its offspring, it teaches science. Our science is so huge that we have to organize it. Our science can grow so fast because we share/communicate very well.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

When an animal educates its offspring, it teaches science. Our science is so huge that we have to organize it. Our science can grow so fast because we share/communicate very well.

 

 

Science is not knowledge. I don't think any animals could be said to gain the knowledge that they pass on by using science.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Perhaps the second most intelligent creatures after human will develop their civilization.

 

 

...man had always assumed that he was more intelligent than dolphins because he had achieved so much—the wheel, New York, wars and so on—whilst all the dolphins had ever done was muck about in the water having a good time. But conversely, the dolphins had always believed that they were far more intelligent than man—for precisely the same reasons. - D. Adams

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If our extinction was slow and inevitable i'm sure some humans would get together and work on some kind of 'legacy project', anticipating that an intelligence would stumble upon it one day.

If we drive ourselves to extinction, is that information worth saving only to possibly infect some future intelligence with the same flaws; is a clean start not better? What we think is good for us may be bad for them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we drive ourselves to extinction, is that information worth saving only to possibly infect some future intelligence with the same flaws; is a clean start not better? What we think is good for us may be bad for them.

 

That rather depends on their view of history. I can imagine it: "Hey, guys, these morons went extinct, so let's not make the same mistake, and let's ignore Newton's Laws...."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we drive ourselves to extinction, is that information worth saving only to possibly infect some future intelligence with the same flaws; is a clean start not better? What we think is good for us may be bad for them.

 

We don't know how rare sentience and civilisation are in the universe. At this point i think we owe it to any beings that follow in our wake to explain what we knew, even if just to tell them what not to do.

 

 

Isn't science knowledge which is empirically proven?

 

What do you think that means and how do you suppose a dog does it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder if the human race gets extinct then what will happen to our remaining technical tools and equipments like the space station, GPS system, computers and so on ? Perhaps an alien society will seize them.

 

In a million years there will be almost no trace of our civilisation, just a load of future geologists wondering what natural process is responsible for all these pockets of concrete?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.