iNow

He’s not “discussing” it. He’s already doing it, and ignoring the courts when they tell him to cease and desist.

All sources have bias, but some are actually useful and informative and take steps to minimize that. Another vote here for PBS and NPR, plus similar “eat your broccoli and like it” style feeds.

Humans create god(s) in their own image, not the other way around

Perhaps, but also they’re weaker as a result of recent actions. https://mailchi.mp/thecipherbrief/the-cipher-brief-nightcap-for-monday-june-23-2025 Experts say this likely reflects Iran’s diminished capabilities. Before the Iranian missile barrage earlier today, former CIA Director General David Petraeus told The Cipher Brief that Iran’s “means of response is dramatically reduced”: Tehran’s proxies are out or on the ropes — Hezbollah has been “decapitated and decimated,” Hamas is already degraded, and the Assad regime in Syria is gone. General Petraeus also noted that Iran’s missile forces have likewise been weakened due to surgical Israeli attacks.

Likely related to moving providers. You have no options here and should move along

You’re

Not a single link in this entire post goes to the reference you copy pasted Thanks. That quote feature sure is handy

Will you teach me? I’m new here

Been there. Done that. Got the tshirt.

My feedback stands. Whether or not you suggest I employ a different tone, your post was laden with useless garbage and did little more than waste space and time.

1983 called. They want their OP back

They don’t care and have been blatantly ignoring court rulings. Even SCOTUS itself is dancing around cases where they know he’ll disregard their rulings, I presume bc they don’t want to look weak and confirm the constitutional crisis people have been warning about.

See also basically any thread with Sohan It seems to be the point

Who said it was? Follow-Up: If it is illegal, who will enforce it since the executive branch owns law enforcement?

We’re not talking about intelligence. We’re not talking about AI. You said there’s definitely a soul. You haven’t defined it nor offered evidence. Stop evading and putting up red herrings.

How about instead you quit clutching your pearls

Incorrect. There are multiple definitions of intelligence, and that’s certainly a challenge. However, you are the one suggesting a soul exists so this isn’t red herring and you are merely distracting from the fact that you lack a broadly accepted and falsifiable definition of soul.

And then inflation… I can explain it for you but I can’t understand it for you. Thanks for the neg

Only if you define soul so broadly that it becomes useless and without meaning

In fact, neutrality becomes compliance and implicit support when faced with circumstances like these. One may as well say they’re neutral on child molestation or the torture of entire communities. Failure to pushback and defend the better path becomes equivalent to support and acceptance of the worse one.

Current circumstances strongly imply the opposite

Can you recommend a better comparison

He was brown. They saw him as an easy way to hit their quota

You mean like really amazing collard greens and peach cobbler and sweet tea and similar fixins, or were you instead talking about deep intensely emotional and transformative music that manages to carry you away from your day and elevate you from your troubles? Either way, I'm fairly certain science accepts both, TBH.

Source: Extraction from rectum. See also: Trust me, bruh