iNow

Probably more bc the farmers were too smart to bother showing up. Good luck with the frozen lines and keeping them unfrozen. Never fun. I had to put a portable space heater in front of the thermostat to get it to turn on a furnace. It refused to engage without an actual temp reading (reading said “Lo” and needed to go above 33 to send the flame command to the heaters circuit board). Put a space heater toward the thermostat and voila! Furnace flame engaged! Then shutoff the space heater a short bit afterward.

No one has distance in a bottle, either. So what? ”Hey barkeep! Give me a pint of centimeters and a plate full of inches, please.”

I like the way Axios summarized this same idea in table format: In addition to my previous reply yesterday, I realized last night that weather like this will also selectively assist those candidates with the strongest ground game. Specifically, those candidacies with lots and lots of volunteers, interns, college kids, etc. showing up to peoples front doors, picking them up in their cars / vans, and shuttling people to and from their caucus locations. Candidates lacking that level of city by city, county by county, town by town coordination and human centered operations will be weaker overall than those candidates who’ve spent the last several months building out that “infrastructure.” And all because Mother Nature kissed us with her blizzard tongue this weekend.

We usually go with the light ones

Better biochemistry lends to nicer narratives.

Looks like it’s gonna be closer to minus 3F and minus 30F windchill that evening. It’s nasty out. Effect: Older voters far more likely to stay home. Representation for the 30-50 something crowd gains higher per vote power / weighting in the totals. More extreme voters more likely to show up than uninspired or lukewarm ones. Life in Iowa as I type this:

No. US President is Commander in Chief of the armed forces and has implicit authority to strike, defend, and respond to attacks without express declaration of war from Congress. More broadly, perhaps that needs to change (see also: Iraq and Afghanistan), but Biden doesn't need to check with the right-wing MAGA extremists in Congress before tossing a missile toward those attacking us and our allies.

I also sometimes see shapes in the clouds!

I’ve noticed that more people carry umbrellas when it rains. Conclusion? Umbrellas make it rain

Science attempts to model how the universe works in a way that minimizes human bias and is consistent regardless of who tries. Every model is provisional and will be quickly rejected when better models come along to replace them. The fact that you mention things like truth and proof in your posts implies that maybe you lack a valid understanding of how and why science works. This isn’t meant to insult you. It’s just a statement of the situation as I see it.

Being temporarily elected President of the US for a 4-year term is NOT equivalent to the divine right of kings who’s authority is said to be an unchallengeable gift from god. Yet… that’s precisely the argument moving through the US Justice system in context of Cheeto Mussolini seeking a 2nd term and evasion of 93 felony charges.

I’m grateful for the open exchange of ideas you shared with Phi and largely agree with you both. I will just add that language itself also evolves, and here in my own posting behavior I become one of the selection mechanisms by which words and usages ultimately propagate. ✌️

Good to know. Next time I lack mushrooms for my dish I’ll add some bread starter 😂

We call it corn flour https://www.healthline.com/nutrition/cornstarch-vs-corn-flour

Yikes is the fact that lawyers believe this is valid, and that voters (at least GOP primary voters) seem to agree.

That's my interpretation. It's corn starch, like what we use in slurries to thicken sauces

@Phi for All hits on this topic regularly, but it's NOT faith... Trust as a term to describe this works just fine. We trust it, and we trust it because evidence suggests we should, and that trust is rewarded because the evidence keeps affirming it. We trust the sun will rise tomorrow morning (or that the earth will rotate in a way that makes the sun once more visible to us over the horizon) and we have evidence that informs this trust. Faith, however, is different. Faith is continuing to believe despite the evidence. When the evidence contradicts that faith, the evidence must be wrong or dismissed. That overlaps in some ways with the concept of trust, but it's not informed or updated in the same way that our trust in scientific models is. The trust is provisional, too... Faith is not.

I would never say something so painfully and pathetically stupid since (as you’ve been told now at least 10x by multiple members) humans ARE apes.

This is a much cleaner way of saying the exact same thing I was previously attempting to communicate here. Thx for the contribution

For the same reason I don’t spend time explaining math to a mosquito

Translated: Stupidity from time waster who shows zero signs of comprehension, good faith, and should’ve been shown the door weeks ago

I’m simply defining “machine” in a broader way than you. Have fun.

Sensitivity to onions is common. Similar issues exist for corn, potatoes, cinnamon, avocado, etc.

Fine, tell me why "it would already have been done" if it were possible... when it's still being worked on? The only thing which has "gotten into me" is a desire to understand your objection and ensure my own stance is accurate. Will you help with that? "If it were possible, it would already have been done." How do you accept this as valid when clearly there are other reasons which may explain the delay?

Enlighten me. How is adding parallelism through networked quantum computers (serially, non-serially, whatever) not a way to enhance speed and performance overall? Why do you steadfastly propose that too is impossible?