Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 02/26/24 in all areas

  1. 4 points
  2. When you think about it...it's brave of those in Alabama to speak up...with so many remaining soylent!
    2 points
  3. LOL! When I put the title up, it reminded me of that film. For those not familiar, Heston in science fiction film Soylent Green says the food they are eating is made from people.
    2 points
  4. I appreciate what you're attempting to convey, String Junky, but you're playing fast and loose with statistics. Black population of the US is about 50 Million, or approx 15 %, so, while there is a great divide that needs addressing, it is not of the magnitude you indicate. IOW, you cannot have equal numbers of millionaires, because numbers of Blacks and non-Blacks are not equal. You don't include a source so I don't know which year the Forbes article gives data for. The Black population of the US was 36 Million 24 years ago, or approx 11% of total population. Per capita numbers/percentages would better illustrate the situation. As for Microsoft's numbers, I would guess they are close enough, and I applaud their transparency. Other companies should do the same. ( even though Bill turned out to be a bit of a misogynist )
    1 point
  5. Even if not, a swing of 0.3-0.7 % looks like random noise to me. The only outrage here seems to be that the swing is not consistently toward the white male segment.
    1 point
  6. I agree chaps. The topic deserves nothing but derision. Like is often said: you can't make this up.
    1 point
  7. I think there are now community shelters for battered embryos there. No one wants to see someone become a scape-zygote.
    1 point
  8. Not when I search. They don't batter embryos in Alabama?(a bit deadpan)
    1 point
  9. I fear the issue is that the norms have shifted so much, that removal of that particular guy might not change future trajectories.
    1 point
  10. No problem. By the way, I should have written, \[ \partial^{\mu}\left(\sum_{n}\frac{\partial\mathcal{L}}{\partial\left(\partial^{\mu}\phi_{n}\right)}\partial_{\nu}\phi_{n}-g_{\mu\nu}\mathcal{L}\right)=0 \] That is correct.
    1 point
  11. All the time Hayley is in the news dilutes and delays Trump's desire to just focus on everything else and, of course, himself. Her best shot is to be a persistent arsefly until she really is out. She should look at this as training and building credibility for 2028.
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.