Skip to content

Speculations

Pseudoscientific or speculatory threads belong here.

Speculations Forum Rules

The Speculations forum is provided for those who like to hypothesize new ideas in science. To enrich our discussions above the level of Wild Ass Guesswork (WAG) and give as much meaning as possible to such speculations, we do have some special rules to follow:

  1. Speculations must be backed up by evidence or some sort of proof. If your speculation is untestable, or you don't give us evidence (or a prediction that is testable), your thread will be moved to the Trash Can. If you expect any scientific input, you need to provide a case that science can measure.
  2. Be civil. As wrong as someone might be, there is no reason to insult them, and there's no reason to get angry if someone points out the flaws in your theory, either.
  3. Keep it in the Speculations forum. Don't try to use your pet theory to answer questions in the mainstream science forums, and don't hijack other threads to advertise your new theory.

The movement of a thread into (or out of) Speculations is ultimately at the discretion of moderators, and will be determined on a case by case basis.

  1. Started by futuretech1281,

    To my own knowledge and understanding of time. I believe that we are but one person traveling in one time zone. We are particles that is traveling so fast that it accually repeating it self but creating a different time line each time it goes around. Imagine a light beam traveling in a circle that 1 beam of light tarveling is creating 1 persons time line. Each time that beam comes around it create another person time line, which is nothing other then yourself 1 person. If wondering about rocks, trees and other things that are still around us. Those are things that we carry with us as memories to the next time line. This is how fast time is.

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 0 replies
    • 659 views
  2. Started by futuretech1281,

    Hi everyone I am a observer of everything in life. I like to study everything around me that I see since I was small. I also like to invent things through my mind. Every day my brain constantly thinks of how things are behaiving and how it become what it is. I dont calculate by using math skills but I calculate by using my imagination to put them together like a puzzle. To my understanding of everything. It all started from one single particle with one single energy, then it add up in to different groups creating different particles and energy. sample: everything starts from a single particles. This single particles then combine within eachother creating other par…

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 11 replies
    • 1.9k views
  3. Started by masterchafed,

    Hope this makes sense to someone. Quantum theory provides a basis for atoms to exist in multiple places at a time. Although most people prefer to think of this as evidence for alternate universes, it seems more likely that every atom in our own universe is constructed purely of the same proton, electron, and neutron all of which have a different quantum state allowing that atom (or construction of protons, electrons, and neutrons) to occupy an infinite number of places at once (infinite being a relative number to suggest that it may occupy as many places as there is enough energy to support.) Now, if a single hydrogen atom can have a nearly…

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 3 replies
    • 1.2k views
  4. We have not found it in the solar system yet. So, I suggest two experiments to find it. Till finding the Dark Matter, any theory could be a speculation. The key point is an using a metalic hydrogen as a Dark Matter detector. Metalic hydrogen has many nucleus per unit volume. But, making a lot of metalic hydrogen is practically not easy. So, observing the metalic hydrogen planet is , I think, more easy to find the Dark Matter. If there are(were) Dark Matter in the solar system, the Dark Matter can(could) not pass through the high density planet without any interactions. http://www2.ifa.hawaii.edu/newsletters/images/fall01/jupiterInfo.jpg http://www.nasa.gov/mis…

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 1 reply
    • 1k views
  5. In the ZWM study of 1991 Mandel et al get coherence between the signal photons of two distinct downconversion sources. This is shown with an interference collection between the two possible sources of signal photons (even though they are entangled with the idler). This is achievable because the two downconversions are pumped by a common source which is beamsplit, and because the idler from one downconversion crystal is transmitted through the other downconversion crystal and superimposed with the second idler (made indistinguishable). Thus the name of his paper "Induced coherence without induced emission". Is it possible to get coherence between two distinct sources of s…

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 4 replies
    • 1.3k views
  6. what is the speed of light? is it 186mi/sec? i do not believe so. this is only so if we are stationary inside our universe. the 186mi/sec i believe is simply a constant ratio of spacetime, thus if we imaginatively rode a photon, then from our view on the photon there is no motion (ie zero speed, and space disappears!). 186mi/sec only APPEAR to be the speed on light because we are on the surface of our universe. in addition by travelling on a second photon in the opposite direction, we double the RELATIVE speed of light which causes time itself to disappear! what is even more remarkable is NONE of this violates SR.

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 11 replies
    • 3.8k views
  7. Started by abisha,

    Constuct Rules. Constuct Moves at the same speed as Light. Reason If moveing slower, light will escape the Constuct If moveing Faster, nothing within the constuct will have existed. force gravity It created outside the constuct, the constuct moves around a other object. with this simple idee, theory of everything is completed. Time arrow. all clocks within the constuct is set to 0 meaning it do not exist when a object is in motion it get pressured against fibers of space so how is this constuct?, is it flawed?, or sounds about right?

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 2 replies
    • 1.1k views
  8. Started by iwasbitten,

    all these faces started appearing after i survived all the attacks that the ring used the first pic is a skull on my bathroom floor i have had dreams about then too there not demons they from the universe the second pic was water residue on the showere floor you can clearly see the fangs the 3rd pic is of horns also on my floor you think horns the devil another word to call them is lambs the bones and lambs live together on the same planet some of them feed on people but not all some eat duck and gill but some crave human blood i know i was bitten my 4th pic is another horn on my bathroom floor after the other was removed 2 pics of horns on my floor …

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 2 replies
    • 915 views
  9. Started by Semjase,

    The evidence that I that I am presenting here confirms that there are strucutres on the moon. http://www.educatinghumanity.com/2012/02/alien-moon-base-china-releases-photos.html http://www.educatinghumanity.com/2012/07/Moon-Structures-Massive-Building-10-Miles-High-Video.html Who made them for what purpose? Any other thoughts or other evidence?

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 22 replies
    • 5k views
    • 1 follower
  10. If there were other Universe, could we find it? It is not easy to find out a highly red shifted Super cluster. If a light left before our Universe was born, could we find it in the night sky? Before Herschel, no one can notice the tiny spot is the galaxy similar to our Milky way.

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 1 reply
    • 819 views
  11. Does this model have any problems? Uranus and Neptune have a similar internal structure. However, inside temperature difference is very high. Two planets big difference seems that they have different rotation direction to their moving direction. This Figure is the internal structure of the two planets. Interacting ice area is a special part of ice which is made at the ultra high pressure. The contacting area is in the next picture. Therefore we can imagine that the temperature difference between the two planet might be the result of interactions between Dark Matter and special ice solid. This is the Uranus image. Why behind part is so bright? http://astr…

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 2 replies
    • 1.2k views
  12. Here's an example of contraction of length of a moving object proven wrong. If you have a ring with a radius of 1m spinning at a velocity of (.75)^.5 of c, under relativity it's radius should appear to be .5m to a stationary observer. Now if you have a clock hand with a radius of 1m with it's outside tip spinning at at a velocity of (.75)^.5 of c then the clock hand should also appear to have a radius of .5m to the stationary observer. If you take an instantaneous snap shot of the moving clock hand, taking into account the x,y velocities of the clock hand when the clock hand in line with the x axis, the clock hand should narrow and shrink radially very little…

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 4 replies
    • 1.8k views
  13. Einstien was wrong energy can be created or destroyed. This is a simple apparatus that will prove this. You set the apparatus on the x y z axis. An input shaft, connected perpendicularly a 1 meter straight collapsable arm that has a negligible diameter frictionless wheel on the end, is placed parallel to the z axis. The arm where it is connected the shaft is at .707 meters on the +x axis and the y axis acts as a wall where the wheel rests at .707 meters on the + y axis and the arm is at a 45 degree angle with respect to the x axis. 1 n meter torque is applied to the input shaft that is rotated 15 degrees and the arm is now at 30 degrees and the arm has als…

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 24 replies
    • 5.1k views
    • 2 followers
  14. Started by svgrammaton,

    PEOPLE MUST KNOW THE TRUE WATCH THIS FILMS http://dfiles.ru/files/2qxdfi08b - this film is about new solar system, the science wrong about solar system

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 2 replies
    • 879 views
  15. Started by alpha2cen,

    Is this method have any problems? There are many theories about Dark-Matter existance. But we have not found it around us yet. So, I think about a new method using a hydrogen planet. Metalic hydrogen has many nucleus per unit volume. But, making a lot of metalic hydrogen is practically not easy. So, Observing the metalic hydrogen planet is , I think, more easy to find that material. The finding method is explained in the next Figure. If Dark Matter exists in the solar system, the particles will collide with the moving planet. Jupiter is a large planet. Most of it's components are the highly compressed metalic hydrogen. When Dark Matter collide with the…

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 0 replies
    • 959 views
  16. We know gravitational wave well. Mass makes gravity. And, at the view of relativity theory, the gravity is a spacetime deformation phenomena. And, we have not found the wave yet. Does spacetime vibration make gavitational wave?

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 8 replies
    • 2.1k views
  17. Started by FunkyAce07,

    Alright, now they have this thing about neutrinos being possibly faster than light. With this they say ruins cause and effect.... Now if you go faster than the speed limit away from a person next to you and looked back at them they will have appeared to be going in reverse as you are catching the light that was reflected off of them in the past. Now say you travel 2 times the speed of light away to 10 light years away the person you would see would be that of 5 years ago. Now you travel back to them at 2 times the speed of light they would seem to be moving around in fast forward at 2 times the actual speed because in 5 years of traveling towards them at twice the speed o…

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 25 replies
    • 5.1k views
  18. Another way to look at Dark Matter. (Ether) The idea of particles eventually becoming so small they would have little to no direct influence on this universe. Particles so small they would appear to have no mass at all or perhap negative mass and create the 3d space everything we see is in. Missing mass? Not at all, just tied up in particles to small by far to detect in any way other than indirectly. How can it take time to cross empty space unless space is dark matter? If you use this explanation for dark matter I think you'll find wave particle duality explains itself. Like sound traveling through air. Force traveling through dark matter is perceived a…

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 11 replies
    • 2.1k views
  19. Started by Ruphustea,

    My main thought, the Bible is a physics book and its freaky......... In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.2 Now the earth was formless and empty, darkness was over the surface of the deep, and the Spirit of God was hovering over the waters. Two heavens= draw a line above and below the centerline drawn representing the "earth" Waters= top and bottom energy And God said, “Let there be light,” and there was light. 4 God saw that the light was good, and he separated the light from the darkness. 5 God called the light “day,” and the darkness he called “night.” And there was evening, and there was morning—the first day Light=energy of li…

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 32 replies
    • 3.8k views
    • 1 follower
  20. Started by A-wal,

    1. Gravity is much weaker than the other forces because it's a force of mass rather than a force of energy, and because E=mc2, the strength of acceleration due to gravity times the speed of light squared is exactly equal to the strength of acceleration due to energy. 2. A black hole is a perfect four dimensional sphere so its length in time is the same as its length in the spatial dimensions, so its life span depends entirely on its mass. 3. The mass of a black hole partly depends on how far away it's observed from because length contraction and time dilation increase the closer an observer is to it, which is why there are no nearby quasars. A black holes mass dec…

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 1 reply
    • 1k views
  21. Started by ox1111,

    Gravity in not believed to travel at c, It is thought to be either instant or travel as fast as c2. Massless particles is used fairly common, but I believe this to be incorrect as well. we know light can and does excelerate space probes and we explain this as radiant energy, but energy with out mass has no inertia and clearly makes no sense. I don't believe in massless particles, I would venture to say that at the mass level and speed the convertion of energy is 100%. I would go as far as saying you can not have energy without mass and I know this is not conventional, but energy as we know it is motion and their is no motion without mass.

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 27 replies
    • 4.8k views
    • 2 followers
  22. Started by bascule,

    If there's one thing which has remained more or less constant throughout human evolutions it's been... humans, or more to the point our brains. We've seen some incremental genetic changes which have improved performance but more or less humanity has existed on a timescale which precludes any major revisions to the overall design. Meanwhile, we've evolved into a society beseiged with information overload. To quote historian James Burke, "Never before in history have so many known so little about so much of the world around them." By this he's referencing the grid, the complex set of human interdependencies which allow us all to pool our resources and collectively at…

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 8 replies
    • 2.5k views
  23. Started by ms.math,

    Watch the image below. If we combine the two triangles we get different results. Triangles will be replaced with the number 3 (because triangles have three angles), the results obtained with the number as a geometric object angles. Connecting the two triangles is the mathematical operations of addition a + b = c 1.3 +3 = 3 2.3 +3 = 4 3.3 +3 = 5 4.3 +3 = 6 5.3 +3 = 7 6.3 +3 = 8 7.3 +3 = 9 8.3 +3 = 10 9.3 +3 = 12 The current mathematics has the answer (4.3 +3 = 6), it is impossible for the other, the reality is that this may be true. I'll show you a review of mathematics that solves problems, join ...

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 51 replies
    • 8.7k views
    • 3 followers
  24. Started by Moontanman,

    Some where in the not too distant past... I read that black holes create new universes by ripping through space time and the energy released by such a puncture (puncture seems more to the point) releases even more energy that expands (energy of expansion was the wording) and creates anew space time full of energy condensing into matter... at some point it seems I remember something about the mass of the black hole reaching a critical mass but then again maybe not... The idea was that universes that have laws of physics that give rise to black holes are more likely to give rise to other universe via the creation of black holes and so propagate their laws of physics. L…

  25. Started by kristalris,

    Seeing that Nobel prize laureate Frank Wilczek has published on space -time crystals http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space-time_crystal%C2%A0 As did David Bohm prior to him as I've just learnt. I wonder why it hasn't already been attempted to do a computer simulation whereby you try to get as many as possible as highly as possible conductive identical spheres go to order in a dynamic crystal given that they all have the same speed in random straight trajectories in a as large as possible as highly as possible conductive cube? The walls will act as a disturbance hence the need of a very large simulated box. If a space-time crystal is a reality it should be…

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 17 replies
    • 1.9k views

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.