Speculations

A Planks formula, a moderators formula and a lay-man -- confused. In a thread about “quanta of time” the moderator exposed a formula about intensity of power of photon depending by frequency and temperature: I ( v,T) = (2*h*v^3) / (C^2 * (e^((h*v) / (k*T)) –1)) In the Plank formula we have another version for the same issue: I (λ,T) = (2*π*h*C^2) / (λ^5 * (e^((h*C) / (λ*k*T)) –1)) I am confused because it seems to me that they differ in amount and in concept. Any explanation please where I am wrong, especially in link between (λ, ν, C)

Could there be two different constants? Energial and Physical(E=mc2)? Well if there could be an energial constant it could look something like this: E(NC)=V∞/0 (Infinity over zero to denote that neutrally charged energy's speed depends on the universe's expansion rate. Or does it?) Answer this question below.

Momentum of electromagnetic radiation is the correct question. How can radiation from the space probe towards empty space possible have a decelerating impact on the pioneer space probes. Are there any scientific evidence for such statement ? It sounds acceptable that the opposite, - which mean photon bombarding / hidding the space probe - could have an effect, and either accelerate of decelerate the space probe. But photons leaving the space probe? - no, - unless there are hard evidence, - such is really difficult to believe.

Hello, I would like to apologize to everyone who read the "McCaustland Theory" it was poorly explained, and very unorganized. This is my second attempt to explain my own personal hypothesis on the universe. First of all I do believe that black holes are actually how the universe first began, this is due to the phenomena known as hawking radiation. This explains why singularities less than a nanometer across dissipate (Correct on measurement if necessary). Now this I believe is due to another still highly hypothetical phenomena I like to call ultra-high velocity ejection. In the hypothesis of ultra-high velocity ejection I believe that when matter reaches the singularity i…

Eureka ! I have it ! .................."Quantum Gravity and the implication for photons" ......................................... Link to Bubbles produced in numbers :- http://www.doctorzig...m/cp2u/image2ql .....very small...quantum bubbles .............-------..... very large galaxy superclusters It is so easy to do . 1. ...... We turn on a light . 2 ..... We fire up a coil ,capacitor , antenna combination We produce quantum bubbles of space time , and out they shoot , like streams of kiddies bubbles at the speed of light. It is so easy . Tying this in with general relativity at the quantum radius , might prove a little mor…

I started at the ?Wall? of Action spreading from what was the center of what you call the Big Bang. I have never wanted to see a bang in wanted to see more. I saw things that would make so I could not be right. They are all as important as anything I recognized must be true. What moves the Universe as we know it can't be made of anything we know. At least on the scale it would have to be happen at. What I see must be doing something beyond that scale. If you have opinion about my choice please just listen. There has to ?Wave Form? other then Space at the Center that filling in and pushing out. ?Parts? says any ?Action? still show ?Parts? the ?Actions? which can already be…

Using a consistent online username, or even better, using your own real-life name across all platforms may play a part in improving your health. That is why I have decided to change my previous username from Mrs Zeta to my real name, Marios Kyriazis. Below is a posting I wrote some months ago about this issue, and I can provide full peer-review references if anyone wants to discuss this: Online anonymity, privacy and longevity (Or: Relinquish your privacy if you want to live longer) At first, it may appear strange to suggest that living longer has something to do with using pseudonyms online. However, it is true. I am suggesting that people who are well known…

Unfortunately, the model with plastically deformed contact points is too inaccurate to hold. It predicts a friction coefficient equal to the ratio of the shear flow stress to the compression flow stress, which is often near 0.6, and that's wrong even for most metals, whose friction coefficient is often between 0.12 and 0.4. These two numbers don't even vary in a correlated way. I know it's one historical model that is taught in books and courses, but there is no reason to believe it, use it, no teach it.

Every equation of the relativity is just the way to understand through to solve one question of math. 1+1=2 step by step. And we just add the feeling into the equation as the hypothesis. I hope to make a big new theory without the relativity. The number is just enough now. Maybe another thing would happen as we understand the way through the math in logical way. The experience is just in the way of the math problem, again too.

Rotation of earth, considered here, is with respect to its axis. Magnitude and type of earth's resultant motion, with respect to an external reference, depends on other simultaneous motions also. Earth also moves in linear direction along with sun (around galactic centre). Therefore, earth's absolute spin motion is relatively very small. Part of 'central force' due to gravity between earth and sun causes steady acceleration of earth's spin motion. For details, kindly see http://vixra.org/abs/1008.0029 Nainan

Sensei Yours, exposed tables, about disintegration of pair proton – antiproton, open another box of worms. And indeed ask for an-other flow of questions. But what have to do, I -- the poor layman, for not falling in “sin of hijacking”? Nevertheless I’ll take the risk. The tables of disintegration (reaction?) of proton -- antiproton, show us that another row of mater antimatter comes from this disintegration, plus in some other kind (bosons?). But in “the end”, those byproduct of disintegration of mater antimatter, doesn’t they combined in…. (bosons?). And prompt: some high thermal energy emerged that further cooled in …. Microwaves. And as for question about “asymmet…

Hi,I am new here and a little intimidated. There are people here who know alot more about this subject than myself, but that's why I came here! So please read my ideas carefully and please don't laugh at me if you disagree, they are just ideas for now and I hope at least one of them could be tested somehow. Right, here goes... As I understand it (correct me if I am wrong) when a wave is observed by us, it becomes a particle, but in so doing 'splits' the universe into many places or rather parallel universes, where each and every outcome occurred simultaneously, though for whatever reason, our mind is also split and observes only the one we are in. But m…

1 second after big bang universe 1 billion kelvin, Now 2.75kelvin. I have not yet read up on the big freeze theory, but I was looking at the gas to solid temperature of the elements http://www.ptable.com/#Property/State I was interested in hydrogen/heliums gas to solid temperatures. Helium freezes at 1.15K / 457.6F(Under pressure) unsure without . Hydrogen freezes at 434.45F, As the universe temperature is roughly 454F, Already 20F below the freezing point of hydrogen, I was wondering how long the stars/sun can still function in these dropping temperatures, The sun is 15 million celsius at core but only 5526 celsius surface/photosphere, 4320celsi…

Hi Where is the antimatter ? During the Bigbang the energy 'condensed' into matter and antimatter. If we accept the Feynman–Stueckelberg interpretation of antimatter, that antimatter are particle going back in time, then there was nothing before the 'condensation' so the antimatter never encontered matter. Anti matter that was created in that time are going back in time and will never meet matter. Is it something that was thaught before ? Thanks

Would it be possible to take advantage of mascons on the moon to generate electricity?

I often come across discussion about how and why the universe is expanding, and what causes the expansion to constantly accelerate. The view currently accepted by science is that dark matter and dark energy are causing this. Since I don't have proof or solid indication of another model, I of course can't speak against that. Still, I'm considering a different explanation, which feels at least plausible in my opinion. I was wondering if there are any similar views, and if anyone else looked at this possibility to a deeper extent. This is my idea: As time goes on, atoms (and ultimately objects) around the universe experience more outcomes at the quantum scale. At least u…

I believe that fundamentally the universe is simple and easy to understand. All complexities are massive quantities of interacting basic particles. The only particles necessary for understanding are electrons and positrons. Quarks are just made up by people. So try on the thought of electrons and positrons being spinning magnets. A neutron then is a collection of an equal amount of electrons and positrons so that it creates a neutral net charge. A proton is a collection of electrons and positrons with one more positron than electron. Atomic structure is created because a neutron is diamagnetic when exposed to the magnetic fields of a proton and an electron. For every pr…

Mitch Bass. The way I view energy indicates that you are correct to believe that motion requires the presence of energy. Even so, the magnitude of energy intrinsic with the motion you are referring to depends on whether the motion is of matter or to that of a photon. In either case, if you were to do an analysis of energy that extends to the fundamental level of reality, you would be compelled to invoke the concept motion however slight, and the magnitude of potential force intrinsic with that motion. In that case, a unit of mass consists of energy amassed to a density of C2 .

-5=-2π -4=-1π -3=-3/π -2=-2/π -1=-1/π 0=0/π 1=1/π 2=2/π 3=3/π 4=1π 5=2π -5=-2π -4=-1π -3=-3/π -2=-2/π -1=<v 0=0 ∞ double zero (infinity symbol) 1=v> 2=r 3=Δ 4=π 5=2π also gut feeling tells me ΔΔΔ.ΔΔΔ = 333.333 = matter/anti-matter? and πππ.πππ = 444.444 = time/anti-time?

The big bang theory presents a number of serious contradictions to our observations of the cosmos. Although many attempts have been made to reconcile these differences, many questions remain unanswered. This new big bang theory offers explanations that better fit our observations and leaves us with more answers than questions. Before presenting a new big bang theory that seems to answer many questions that the current big bang theory does not, a brief review of some of the problems with the current big bang is in order. The big bang theory has several vexing problems. First, there is the big void, close to a billion light years across space, which lies at the edge of th…

Been wondering about light/photons passing through different mediums, I believe light is still c relative to each medium, But from our perspective light is slowed down. I believe light can be slowed to a walking pace through a Bose Einstein condensate, I was wondering if a single photon/beam pulse was passed through a Bose Einstein condensate how would those photons exit condensate?, if one photon was still in condensate and nearest photon as just left condensate returning to c relative to us, would they exit cause a strope effect?(3) Or would photon "stretch?(2) I believe that the photons within condensate may be "spaced", Could you perhaps then pass another photon…

So that you can go about playing Elitest bullies to others who feel inferior enough about themselves and their models to take it.

About motion of single electron in atomic hydrogen you can read in the article http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=49252#.VFoXwxYTOUl

I have come here today to present a revised, and better version of the "Universal creation and rebirth speculation." My theory has several important points. 1. Black holes are relatives of the big bang. Essentially a black hole if large enough could create another big bang, although the amount of matter and energy this would take is enormous. 2. Particles with enough velocity (Theoretical particles (tachyons) and possibly neutrinos in special cases) can escape the event horizon because black holes do not have infinite gravity or mass. (Pet theory, Ultra-high velocity ejection) 3.The universe as we see it today is part of an endless cycle of universal implosio…

Person-a travels on circumference c1. Person-b travels on circumference c2. There will be time-dilation. Person-b will age more slowly relative to Person-a. However... say that Person-a & Person-b can look at each other throughout the rotation, and light travels between them at c, do we not have an impossible situation of relativity? Please explain in plain English.