Modern and Theoretical Physics

Hello, I am new here, I hope that I'm not violating any rules by posting my work on the unification of physics. I submitted this paper today, and I hope I can atleast a detailed review from the journal. This paper is my most serious work on the topic, and it start defining a function that is sometimes seen in solutions to some equations in Engineering and Physics. Then it discusses it's properties and identities, then it defines a coordinate system based on on it. Then QM and GR expressed in those coordinates and are connected together through a general form of GR incorporating the mass gap equation's solutions, all within the newly defined coordinates s…

Been examining a newer way of looking at Feymann integrals that greatly helps simplify some of the mathematics. The method employs the charge conjugation relations to simplify allowable interactions on Feymann integrals. https://arxiv.org/pdf/hep-ph/9601359 Figured this would get a bit of interest for discussion.

I am simulating a solar cell structure with 2D grating and nanoparticles. Is there any possibility of seeing the Talbot effect in the electric field profiles inside the solar cell? What is the circumstance for seeing this effect in this optical structure?

This is a newly research from John A. Macken, Published in Journal of Modern Physics. A new insightful work which gives a very new wave perspective of the Universe. About the theory: In this article, spacetime is modeled as a quantum mechanical sonic medium consisting of Planck length oscillations at Planck frequency. Planck length-time oscillations give spacetime its physical constants of c, G and ħ. Oscillating spacetime is proposed to be the single universal field that generates and unifies everything in the universe. The 17 fields of quantum field theory are modeled as lower frequency resonances of oscillating spacetime. A model of an electron is pro…

Premise I have this kid, ok? A girl, at that, so, like, the least suitable canditate you'd imagine for a theorethical physics conversation. I'm just a parent. Parents might have deep conversations. But I'm no prof scientist. I work summer jobs to survive, I started coding a videgame on my spare time. I only just learned a bit about javascript. I try reading the posts in this forum and it's all mandarin, alien language. But, I fed Einstein famous E = MC² to my kid, and she broke. Like... brain fried. Then, after we panicked and stuff for 2 days, almost about to call the ambulance, she comes back to reality and starts drawing stuff. Now,…

Suppose we have a massive particle (Would a proton be the smallest or can quarks exist as an individual massive particle?) moving in the Higgs Field. Does its trajectory change if it gets close to an actual Higgs particle as opposed to the Field? I have a picture of a Higgs particle acting like a source of gravitation of the particle but doubtless this is both simplistic and wrong. Also wondering how massless particles' trajectories are affected...

Wondering how people feel about Stephen Wolfram, the Runiad,rulial space, and computational reducibility? Just curious...

In the present atomic model the atom consists of components but could the electron just be an elementary particles conservation of charge ?

I would like to ask if Gluons are affected by the Higgs field in the same way as atoms. I've watched PBS video about the possibility that the Higgs field doesn't engage all particles equally but the specifics weren't clear.

If we reflected lasers back to earth from mars could we receive information before the information is sent? If the information travelled at the speed of light to mars and back to earth would it effectively be time travel for information?

Since Google physicists created the first time crystal, I've been wondering if this new state of matter could be a source of infinite energy. Could a machine be built that can harvest the energy of a time crystal in some form? (I'm in middle school, so I don't have much experience with physics)

Hello, world. I’m eager to share the motivations behind my work with you all. As Michio Kaku points out, we are a level 0 civilization—it’s time for us to advance. I deeply appreciate the monumental efforts and contributions of our scientific pioneers and current researchers. Yet, considering it has been over three centuries since Newton and a century since Einstein, we must ask ourselves: What’s next? Let’s unite our strengths, incorporating AI and interdisciplinary collaboration to transcend traditional boundaries. It’s time to set aside personal biases and collectively push the frontiers of science. Together, we can explore the cosmos and develop new energy s…

Hi, all, I am interested in the mathematical foundations of theoretical physics and gave been posting pdf's to the url deleted I just discovered this forum, but I can try to keep it updated as to progress if allowed (It is too much to duplicate posts; i'm 83+ and don't have much time left. A documenet that has most of my current links is available at: url deleted Chuck

I believe I have come up with a particle accelerator breakthrough, and I need your help so I can know if it is practical or not. Before I start to talk about this idea, I must inform you not to steal it, and if you do, I have proof of it being stolen right here and will get you in legal trouble. Now that that is over, I will tell you, my idea. Einstein got his well-deserved Nobel Prize in 1921 for his work on the photoelectric effect. Now, quantum mechanics has gone off the rails with quark-gluon-plasma, quantum fluctuations, particle accelerators and much more. What if I told you I came up with a way to combine the photoelectric effect and particle accelerators toge…

I read that by about the year AD10¹⁴ the last stars will be dead, so no more light in the universe, and the universe will leave the stelliferous era and enter the dark degenerate era. The universe will have evaporated away altogether by AD10¹⁰⁰ If species are still around in the year 10¹⁴, I assume life will no longer be possible with no more light. If so, will it in theory be possible for spectacularly advanced species to repair, prolong or create new stars and thus prolong the stelliferous era? Not indefinitely of course, but for alot longer? Cheerz DECLAN🙂XXX

Magister colin leslie dean has shown Determinism shown to end contradiction Determinism shown to end in Meaninglessness nonsense Causal determinism en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Determinism “Causal determinism, sometimes synonymous with historical determinism (a sort of path dependence), is "the idea that every event is necessitated by antecedent events and conditions together with the laws of nature." “Causal determinism has also been considered more generally as the idea that everything that happens or exists is caused by antecedent conditions” take the 3 body problem –as a simplification of all things in the universe …

gravity by muhammad owais pdf_2602242145004.pdf

The Lagrangian, \[\mathcal L(x)= \frac 1 2 \partial^{\mu} \phi (x) \partial_{\mu} \phi (x) - \frac 1 2 m^2 \phi (x)^2\] for a scalar field \(\phi (x)\) is said to be "Lorentz invariant and transforms covariantly under translation." What does it mean that it transforms covariantly under translation?

*"It is impossible for a contradictory thing to be true.* A non-contradictory thing could be true or false depending on context but at least has the *possibility* of being true." - me, I said that ❌️Contradictory Theology, Mathematics and Physics (Knowing Good; Functions; limit built into every operation)❌️: 1. The Genesis 1 character and the Genesis 2 character are the exact same character. 2. Zero is not fundamental and nonzero numbers are fundamental (Newton/Einstein calculus). 3. 0D is not locally real and 1D, 2D, 3D, 4D are locally real (Newton/Einstein physics). ✅️Non-contradictory Theology, Mathematics and Physics …

I'm looking for direct references two specific double slit variations that have been performed. All I can find are vague 2nd and 3rd hand accounts and references about these. If anyone can help me, I'd sure appreciate it. 1st: a double slit setup was sent to a bunch of different colleges. They each shot one photon through the apparatus onto a separate recording plate, then passed the setup on. When the plates were compiled there was an interference pattern with each photon knowing it's place in the overall pattern, independent of time. 2nd: The double slit wave collapse. I've read that if the measurement that collapses the wave into a a particle pattern…

"How much energy would you put into ITER to fuse 1 kilogram of lead into gold?" ... to fuse 1 kilogram of lead (Pb) into gold (Au), we need to consider the mass difference between the two elements and the energy release per nucleon during fusion. The atomic mass of lead is approximately 207.2 atomic mass units (AMU), and the atomic mass of gold is around 197.0 AMU. Therefore, to convert 1 kilogram (1000 grams) of lead into gold, we need to account for the mass difference, which is 10.2 AMU. The energy release per nucleon during a fusion reaction is typically on the order of millions of electron volts (MeV). However…

I hope you are all are doing well. I am engineer that is doing some home experiments on electrical signals through topological surfaces and was wondering if you guys know of any resources I could look at to get a better understanding. I personally find it useful to have a textbook that I can reference when working on new subjects. Thank you for your time

Are atoms inanimate? Is it possible to prove whether: – Atoms are inanimate objects which respond to a priori forces OR – Atoms are material systems which respond spontaneously to their energetic environment This might seem an esoteric question, but it has fundamental implications for the way we see the universe around us. The former statement is consistent with materialistic philosophy, that which we’ve inherited from the Victorians. But the latter would seem to be the direction of travel that quantum mechanics is taking us in. If the latter holds, then all forces of nature are the consequence of the behaviour of matter and not the consequ…

Renormalization

hi, I am a physics student in grade eleven. I do not have much knowledge of physics but I have a doubt: i am well aware of the theory that all masses dropped at the same height from earth will accelerate at the same speed but i say this is wrong i have come up with a possible contradiction for this: In the first case, both masses are the same and accelerate toward each other at the same rate. Now in cases 2 and 3, I have reduced the mass (m1), as this happens point of collision moves towards the greater mass. Now let's consider that all 3 collisions take the exact same time for collision. the distance between the objects in all three cases is the same. Now looki…