dimreepr

Of course not, its a series of excuses designed to justify your desire to exclude some people you haven't met and deny them the chance of, whatever you don't like. Besides, what game doesn't have a workable set of rules for all parties involved? Well of course they have, it was bad enough when a machine rocked up and beat them, if a girl turns up and does the same, I can only image the devastation... 😲

LOL, nice try, but "you over nyah and me over nyah"; I'd better run it again, for the slow learner's...

Well, the reason I do is: I imagine that that person is me, then I imagine what I would feel like if I wasn't allowed to play, because of some bigoted idiot who can't accept that his hero could be beaten by, or become, a woman. Is that the same as your reason? In my opinion Richard Dawkins is an arrogant dick, he basically said "anyone that thinks differently to me must be delusional", any argument derived from this is, ironically, delusional... 🙄

It's the question I've asked, in many different ways, throughout the last 10 or so pages, and always ignored; but WTF I feel lucky, why do you care what game's other people play? "I have asked so many that have gone ignored I've lost count." All of your questions have been answered, it's not my fault that you assume anything you don't understand, should be ignored...

Oh come on, this isn't a playground; be honest and point to a post where you, or anyone else, have answered my fundamental question. I can't be bothered with this thread until you, or anyone else, answer my, very simple, fucking question; until you do, I'll be over nyah...

Oh FFS, just answer the question, why do you care? The reason I care is, what if I found myself in a situation where I wouldn't be allowed to play in a game that disallows my webed feet... Over to you... 🧐

It's not absent, you're just looking in the wrong place; try looking for meditation and it's various techniques, both lead and self induced. 😉

This clip sums up my response...

Have you actually read this? "Using testosterone levels as a basis for separating female and male elite athletes is arguably flawed."

What did I miss? Lord Coe, only got to the top of the greasy pole because he was allowed to play in the first place, with his inherent advantage's... It is very unfortunate that people who want too play against people that also want too play, are unable to do so because other people, not involved in the game (by which I mean not playing), maybe it's because they can't think of a way to make money out of it. You both keep stamping your feet and claiming it's unfair with no actual evidence, WHY IS THAT? If it's not a misogynistic bias, then what is it?

Oh, OK, Lord Coe confirms it; well he certainly has proved that he has no interest in money... where's the slap head emoji when I need it 😣 I'm guessing this will confuse @mistermack...

And here we are again, back on page one, in a cloud of misogyny... Transgender athletes just want a magic wand and a spell (expelliarmus seems appropriate), and then to just get on with their lives and play with whomever they like... "International sports bodies have certainly moved in the direction of my position." No they haven't, they're just trying to maintain a political legitimacy to keep the sport financially viable; which leads us back to Cartman...

That's a question for another topic. I thought you said there's a lack of evidence, you can't have it both way's. 🙄

Don't you see the parallel's, or the irony? If there's a current lack of evidence, then what are you complaining about? If you accept their (the risk players) choice of colour will have no effect on the game, then what are you complaining about?

Your argument centers around risk and every game has a certain amount jeopardy that's why we watch and play, because that's life played out in a game. But that's like not letting anyone play near a railway, good advice for a child, but condescending for an adult. It's not an athletic choice, it's a human one. It's like asking what colour do you want in a game of risk or what avatar in monopoly?

because he doesn't want to hear the answers, they're not real enough to fit his universe...

No more than your denying the inbetweener's. edit, for instance, if I tuck my ball sack away and squint, my dick does look like a clitoris... Your issue seems to resonate with all the other 'isms' out there, 1, fairness as I see it. 2, freedom to identify as one chooses, provided it doesn't conflict with my freedom to put a stop to all this madness... 😣 They don't, they just want to take their rightful place on the spectrum of humanity. Your signature is right though, simplicity is often blinding.... Still no answer to this question, so I thought I'd bump it, for any brave righties out there to answer...

If only, +1. Now, what's the betting on 100+ page's?

All I wonder is why you all care so much about something that doesn't involve you at all, except in the most vicarious of way's??? What you mean by this can only be, that it's your finger on the scales; all I want is finger free scales, you know, a fair deal... 😉 The only agenda we have is, one step closer to a slightly better society... 😉

Knowledge is always worth the effort, but like I said "we can't beat it into you"; as tempting as that option may be...

In the context of this thread, average isn't good enough to win, and that piss' off a lot of people; if you don't believe me just visit a pee-wee game, and check out who's going postal!!! I can't show you something that your unwilling to see... 😣

Well for one, the elite levels are pushing the envelope within the chosen field of play, so that's where the best data is; let's not forget that the elite level is, by definition, designed to route out the outlier's of human physiology. (edit, which we're happy to celebrate, as long as the women don't look like men) I hope you don't think this question in any way turns the tables, if anything it puts more pressure on you to come back with at least one reason why my reason/ing is wrong? Besides, why is it only elite athlete's that 'deserves your' protection? It's not our job to understand it for you, there's now 83 page's of very patient explanation's; not everyone gets it first time round, and we're not aloud to beat it into you, so I suggest you read it again, because some of the subtle stuff obviously did a fly-by... 🧐

Of course not, they haven't played 'yet'; how can you possibly explain a game that hasn't been played? But if you really want to know what my version of fairness is, it's very Darwinian, "let them fight"... 😉

Of course it's a no, because 'they' will always be wrong, despite reason (you've said it before); you've yet to explain why you support this particular "ism" of thought... 🧐