dimreepr

As far as I can tell, what you mostly dislike is reasonable argument's that you can't refute. The irony is strong with this one @iNow, he refuses to learn anything from science that doesn't agree with his belief; almost Pythonesque, in a life of Brian quest for the holy grail sort of way.

I read that some artist's would forge a work, that 'was' new, once upon a time...

I think I know, but apart from that... If one is a fruit fly, 7 years worth of generation's would take them back to 'before the stone age'; it's all a matter of perspective... 🧐 Not that you'll be able to read this, which is ironic... So, what are you trying to say? Because AI is really good at forming new images from external sources.

Do you realise how much you would need to 'Torture' that premise!!!

If we find life elsewhere in the universe, what difference could it make??? We can't comunicate and we can't make a meaningful extrapolation, vis-a-vis the universe; IOW a meaningless project... But, it's a bloody good excuse for funding...

The Total Perspective Vortex will show you your value...

An ant has evovled to prove intelligence doesn't matter... 😉

"Oh come on, it's right there 'in the script'" "Jesus" 😣 "OK, let's take it from the top"...

Human spirituality means nothing to AI, much like AI imagination means nothing to us. As I've previously mentioned, it would be like talking to God without the magic guy 'voice of god' (translator). AI consciousness will always be a mystery to us, but never impossible...

That's my point, you don't have too: Liike I said it's a yin-yang thang... 🧐 Glad to see you haven't lost your dislike of me, I hope it brings you comfort... 😇🙏

LOL, it has it's place...

“One swallow does not make a summer, neither does one fine day; similarly one day or brief time of happiness does not make a person entirely happy.” ― Aristotle, The Nicomachean Ethics The yin to your yang.

Logic takes us to the most likely explanation from the available information; when it meets a paradox, it doesn't mean the paradox is real, it means the information is unavailable. Therefore logically, to draw the conclusion that logic is therefore illogical, is illogical... Couldn't be bothered to read the rest.

This question, for me, is akin to, will forest Green Rovers win the UEFA Champions League? The probability is low, but if they do it'll be a great day and then, meh...

If nothing else, he/it/she provides a good set up for the jokes... 🧐

By that definition a sharp rock doesn't count as a descendant of a bread knife and therefore cannot be used to study sharpness, or bread... Of course you do 🙄, since any possible argument, is impossible; bc you have spoken the truth already...

I am the Walrus I'm not sure, it is mildly entertaining.

Don't worry, nor is he. Organoid's are an exciting new line of inquiry thoguh.

And? In a topic about evolution, which is essentially the process of getting better at what it is/does, there can be absolutely no doubt that this is happening with computer's; in fact IIRC human's no longer designs the architecture of a computer chip, a computer does. We can never know what evolution will produce tomorrow, given enough tomorrow's it could be anything that's physically possible, even a computer with agency. Because he doesn't know the answer, ask enough times and he'll block you (don't worry, he can't hear me 😉).

For the absurdities of the extremes to be exposed before the people, first we have to suffer it, then a martyr should lay down his life before the sacred pendulum of politikos. So, Trump et al is to be suffered, before the martyr is pissed off enough...

The problem is, evil is just as immune to a proper definition, as is time. The problem of kindness, is that it's trying to kill my dog; my wife can't stop giving him treat's...

And we're back to the same handwaving and bs arguments you presented in your other thread on the subject; basically it's blind faith in the ineffability of humanity, through some sort of God, as far as I can tell... Well, that's another iron-e-meter bolloxed FFS, I wish they could design one that could evolve past, throwing in the towel; you don't know the difference between an argument and gainsaying, look em up... Better still:

I've read the bible and the lessons are there for all to read, most of which don't really include god, well, not the good ones; the bad ones need a little more thought to understand the author's intention, and guess what, the author isn't god. TBH mate, if you're hearing or seeing god, you'd be more likely to start a new religion. Please feel free to preach your heart out, just please recognise the source of your enlightenment and let people make up their own mind; sometimes abortion leads to a sunlit upland, for the parent, and not the hell that child would have to suffer from a malicous/unprepared/unwilling/disinterested/unable parent...

So, your solution is to run away? If only refugee's could think that clearly...

Does one still have a soul if one doesn't have a god?