Everything posted by iNow
-
Corona virus general questions mega thread
Stay away from others
-
Please tell me we have free will
Breathing is autonomic, by definition not voluntary. You could voluntarily tie a bag around your head for all I care, but your body would still attempt to breath. Your suggestion that your personal will is free in this regard is absurd.
-
Please tell me we have free will
Not really, no. You can wound yourself in such a way that breathing will eventually stop, but you cannot voluntarily stop breathing. My point is valid regardless of what word games you try to play.
-
Please tell me we have free will
Just because it results in difficult considerations in our punishment approach and justice system doesn’t mean free will itself is anything more than a postdictive illusion. You cite possible downstream consequences as a reason to reject the validity of the upstream conclusion. That’s illogical and they’re irrelevant. Because there would be no functional difference in our experience. Whether or not we have free will, the way we perceive the world around us is largely unchanged. Why bother breathing if you have no choice is a similarly absurd question.
-
Why is the earth at an angle?
We’d still experience changes in weather and climate but seasons would be different.
-
Today I Learned
People who want to prevent terrorists from using these platforms to grow and spread their hate Now, if only they could do the same with fake divisive political posts...
-
Today I Learned
The Facebook counter terrorism team is larger than the entire counter terrorism team of the US Department of State
-
Debt-free College (Yang's Plan) - Split
Lol. Skitts law strikes again: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muphry's_law
-
Debt-free College (Yang's Plan) - Split
It’s at least an order of magnitude too high, in fact $1,200/mo, not $12K
-
Debt-free College (Yang's Plan) - Split
So, what are the key elements of Yangs debt free college plan we should discuss?
-
Debt-free College (Yang's Plan) - Split
Then talk about Yangs plan and how it compares to what we’ve been discussing. Don’t reply to an off the cuff comment about not being able to root for Yang, ask why, amd expect us all to read between the lines that you meant in context of this topic. i asked these Yang posts to be moved to the Democratic primary thread. Feel free to post specifically about the debt free tuition component of Yangs candidacy here. X-posted with migL
-
men vs woman
If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough. Albert Einstein
-
The Official JOKES SECTION :)
I’m confident your mind is far from small, but continuing to speak about the looks of others in a mocking way forces me to reconsider. Your call. Carry on
-
The Official JOKES SECTION :)
I’ll quote Eleanor Roosevelt now: Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people.
-
men vs woman
Actually, no. Probably not. Much more likely is confirmation bias.
-
men vs woman
Neither of you. Males and females not as different as you both seem to think
-
Only 10% of the Nobel prize winners are atheist ?
My questioning of assertions and suspicion of source data underlying those assertions doesn’t magically shift the burden of proof on to me. Even if for the sake of discussion we assume the number is valid, the easy explanation is that atheism as a label wasn’t really used back then. It only came into prominence within the last decade or two. Prior, most called themselves non-practicing, or deistic, or more believers of Spinoza’s god of nature, for example. Regardless, I do find the claim far too questionable to take seriously or hypothesize about reasons. YMMV
-
Only 10% of the Nobel prize winners are atheist ?
Nonsense.
-
Only 10% of the Nobel prize winners are atheist ?
https://www.scienceforums.net/topic/108124-welcome-to-the-upgraded-sfn/page/4/?tab=comments#comment-1011928 No. I think most never bothered to answer the question and that the 10% claim relies too heavily on assumption and limited data
-
Only 10% of the Nobel prize winners are atheist ?
Because in my experience I’ve found that it’s a wise standard operating procedure when it comes to questionable assertions like these. Most people that I know don’t go around declaring their nonbelief or religiosity, especially in context of well known scientific awards.
-
Only 10% of the Nobel prize winners are atheist ?
I question the validity of the source data. Is sharing ones religious affiliation / nonbelief in an open and honest way prerequisite to receiving the award? No, it’s not, so most of these “data” underlying the claim of “only 10%” are surely better classified as unsourced assumptions. You may as well be asking why only 10% of Nobel winners like mozzarella.
-
Book by Stephen Hawking
I enjoyed the Magic Furnace by Marcus Chown
-
Woodworking: Amateurs, Craftsmen, & In-Between
Thanks, guys. Lots of new skills and never before tried techniques went into that one. Merry Christmas 🥂
-
Woodworking: Amateurs, Craftsmen, & In-Between
-
What are you listening to right now?
In my case, it’s mostly all the craft beer