iNow

Language isn’t the problem here. Comprehension, understanding, and intellectual honesty are.

Now you’re moving goalposts by adding that your villain must be conscious. That’s fine, but now you must define what you mean by consciousness. I’m not hopeful you’ll succeed. It’s not idle at all, especially when one considers more common usages of free will and how neuroscience undermines those usages. And again, you evade direct questions:

I tend to agree, which is why you look so extremely and irreparably foolish saying ridiculous things like this:

Which means I also get to decide. I’ve decided you’re evil and that your life is worth less than a chicken. How will you defend against this?

As I thought. You’re not worth anyone’s time. Thanks for confirming.

Do you also get to decide who is and is not evil?

This clearly depends on the measure being used. Since, however, you said “completely,” what is also clear is that you have no idea what you’re talking about and aren’t worth listening to. Like here, again spouting trivially false nonsense suggesting China hasn’t invested in its own economy. You post often here and seem to like including laughable fictions essentially every time you do. You also still haven’t answered my direct question:

I’d agree with you, but then we’d both be wrong.

Do you also get to decide who is and is not a villain?

As someone who has both delivered and received such strikes, I can promise you this is also untrue. It is a factor of involvement of hips and shoulders that’s relevant here, not straightness nor curviness of the strike.

They’ve joined allies across the EU, imposed sanctions, and called it out in clear terms as genocide so international courts can investigate and level charges. Beyond that, the only other options involve sending in bombs and soldiers. Is that what you’re recommending? If not, then what ARE you suggesting they do?

Lol

You know what they call alternative medicine that actually works? They call it medicine.

Apologies. The only time bacteria flagella ever enter my mind is when I’m considering how deeply and frustratingly ignorant creationism is yet how fervently the pious and faithful believe it. Glad you found your answer, though. Thanks for sharing.

Too late

First, this is irrelevant to the points made. Second, it's yet another wrong claim asserted by you.

The existence of doubt is generally inherent in all debate

This is a thread about water on the moon, not human economics or cold war politics.

People should disregard most of the nonsense Senator Ron Johnson keeps spewing. He's clearly prioritized riling up a low information voting base instead of bothering with any truth or integrity or desire to help those he represents.

Uniform? No. Homogenous? Yes.

Oh, hey look. Another thread where JohnSSM has driven all conversation away from the actual topic of the OP. I see, however, the mods have already addressed this. Thx team.

There go those reading comprehension issues again. That your argument is absurd and even uses the tenets of absurdism itself. Correct, and you weren’t personally attacked. Quit whining and being so sensitive, or report the post for review if you feel a rule has been broken. You technically already have, but it’s good that you won’t persist since you still are misusing that term.

I like this idea... like another moon or planet crosses between the planet and the star every 4 years causing long lasting shadows and extreme cold. Nice +1

Lol It depends a bit on how one defines "random." Genes copy themselves and do wo within certain guardrails and process prerequisites, yes, but during this process there are also random mutations. Some get selected for, some get selected against, some have no measurable effect on outcomes. If it's not random, then really the only other explanation is it's directed... which as you were already told in that other thread which got closed... a status this new thread will soon have as well... that smacks of creationism and results in absurd "it's turtles all the way down" conversations when you start exploring who created the creator... and who created that ad infinitum. Even if you're not thinking of creator, you'd need to explore all free radical interactions and gamma rays coming in to break apart structures and that all follows variabel probabilities and randomness. But since you were told not to bring this up, yet did anyway... the next step for this thread will be anything but random.

Ocean currents. Think of phenomena like La Nina and El Nino, just more intense and instead of happening every 9-12 months they happen every 30-36 months. https://www.weather.gov/media/owlie/2018_ENSO.pdf