swansont

the matter/antimatter asymmetry is the issue of why we have matter and not antimatter around. The amounts are not equal, or symmetric g-2 refers to the muon magnetic moment experiment, in the nature link I added to my previous post I come from atomic physics, which gave us "optical molasses" and "Bose-nova" (both, I think, from the Wieman and/or Cornell research groups) so don't look to me for help.

So they say scientists don't know what the force is, exactly, but imply it will explain dark matter, these muon issues, matter/antimatter asymmetry, etc. Also, they imply this is a revelation, when we know the standard model is incomplete. I saw on twitter where it was stated the g-2 results from today used the same storage ring design as the previous results (which showed a similar disagreement with the standard model), meaning you can't rule out some systematic errors. edit: the calculations that incorporate better QCD values narrows the discrepancy between theory and experiment https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-00898-z

What have you concluded?

redcorner2000 banned as a sockpuppet of sweetque and molbol2000

Scandinavia isn’t a country https://checkinprice.com/average-and-minimum-salary-in-stockholm-sweden/ Sweden does not have an official minimum salary. Minimum salaries are generally negotiated through workers’ unions. As a reference, the salary for a McDondald’s cashier is hovering around 101 to 125 Swedish Krona, or roughly 15 USD per hour.

And it gives off even less energy in microwaves, because those are inside the chamber. (unless it’s broken) A 1 kW microwave that’s 66% efficient at converting electrical energy to microwave energy is dumping 1 kW into the food and 500 W is waste heat, some/most of which is sent off to the outside environment.

I would think heat is much more likely than microwave leakage. I’m not sure how you eliminated that from consideration. There’s a lot more thermal energy involved as compared to microwave, outside of the chamber.

Than you aren’t hearing ultrasound, as you had claimed. Yes, you did say this. “I want nanometer resolution of the tissue, if I can see DNA, sure.” Right there in the OP The hubris of claiming you did not say things when there’s a written record in plain sight is astounding Tera, not tetra And there is scientific application here, if you had any interest in learning the science. That’s not defamation. That’s feedback for lazy thinking.

You can't, by definition, hear ultrasound It was your math that said 10 GHz gives 140 nm resolution in tissue, which means that you do not have 1 nm resolution. This is science, not magic. You can't just conjure up an answer out of thin air. The wavelength you can get depends on the speed of sound in the medium, so any calculation for one medium will not work for another medium in which the speed is different. IOW, THz might work in what the article says is the application, e.g. in silicon or other semiconductors (checking for defects in circuits), while not working in e.g. water or air. You have to show it, i.e. do some science.

It’s not obvious to my why this would be.

What part of the article leads you to this conclusion?

OK, sound waves in a non-lattice structure, if you’re wanting look at DNA. (i.e. how does a 1 nm sound wave propagate, if the atoms are, say, 10 nm apart, and not in a lattice?How does thermal noise impact this propagation?)

I recall a discussion in which it was suggested that nerds/geeks place a high value on information, which is why there is this conflict with people that place a higher value on manners, and the situation where someone being corrected might be considered rude. The nerd accepts and perhaps welcomes the correction, rather than getting upset. This explains the tendency of scientists being nerds.

Then your first question has been answered. nanometer resolution is not achieved with 10 GHz ultrasound. You would need more than 100x higher frequency, and you’d need to establish that it’s possible to have sound waves at that frequency.

Yes. So does Tyson.

! Moderator Note But you named people, which doesn’t seem consistent with ethical standards and medical privacy laws.

! Moderator Note You should link to it, for reference

! Moderator Note Posting to advertise your site is a violation of rule 2.7

If it’s part of the explained universe, then there’s nothing to explain. So what is unexplained, and how does your idea not contradict existing science? What we understand excludes a lot of potential explanations.

Show the math

What are you trying to explain that isn't covered by existing science? You've mentioned mechanical and thermodynamic effects, but both are areas of established physics. Ask the question in a new thread, please.

There are radio stations that broadcast the USNO master clock voice announcer feed when they have certain issues, so people know the station is still broadcasting. Maybe I can slip Girl from Ipanema in there next April 1

You are correct, this is where I got it. “classified” does not mean they know but aren’t telling.

Can you provide a quote? I think you’re reading more into the article than what’s there.

If they can’t identify them, they can’t restrict the possibilities