Skip to content

Speculations

Pseudoscientific or speculatory threads belong here.

Speculations Forum Rules

The Speculations forum is provided for those who like to hypothesize new ideas in science. To enrich our discussions above the level of Wild Ass Guesswork (WAG) and give as much meaning as possible to such speculations, we do have some special rules to follow:

  1. Speculations must be backed up by evidence or some sort of proof. If your speculation is untestable, or you don't give us evidence (or a prediction that is testable), your thread will be moved to the Trash Can. If you expect any scientific input, you need to provide a case that science can measure.
  2. Be civil. As wrong as someone might be, there is no reason to insult them, and there's no reason to get angry if someone points out the flaws in your theory, either.
  3. Keep it in the Speculations forum. Don't try to use your pet theory to answer questions in the mainstream science forums, and don't hijack other threads to advertise your new theory.

The movement of a thread into (or out of) Speculations is ultimately at the discretion of moderators, and will be determined on a case by case basis.

  1. Started by Clipper,

    Init weird how in life things can either go ‘up and down’, or good and bad, or in between good and bad, or extremely bad. It’s levels of things, like umm... text on a screen. It’s either there or it’s not. A percentage of it is either going or coming. I have a good day, then I’ll have a bad day; these things come and go, but they literally do ‘come and go’. So let’s say we have: Good day + Bad day = mediocre day. And Bad day + Bad day = terribad day and Good day + Good day = brilliant day. But these descriptions are just levels in-between the two originals. So even really when you say you had a mediocre day, you mean that it wasn’t bad nor good. And …

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 19 replies
    • 2.3k views
  2. Atheists, see, you degenerates have last names like first names... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flying_Spaghetti_Monster ************************************************** ***************** how about I believe in WHATEVER I want - even in the FLYING SPAGHETTI MONSTER! - and you have nothing to say! ******************************************************************** let me show you the end results of this particular *ONE-DIMENSIONAL SCIENTIFIC MODE* of thinking that is called *CRITICAL THINKING*, which is completely divorced from any human objectives... this style has been perfected by dawkins, pz, randi and the other *NEW ATHEISTS*…

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 48 replies
    • 5.9k views
  3. Started by ponderer,

    Whatever you say. http://memebox.com/futureblogger/show/835-new-hyperspace-engine-could-roundtrip-mars-in-5-hours http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g_ylP4kh-xA

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 24 replies
    • 3.2k views
  4. These are questions that I don't have theories for or proofs, but just speculations based on "observations". Is there any evidence for or math for the "condensation" of energy back into matter? We know that in fission and fusion reactions, a portion of the yield is energy that does not have particles, "pure energy", but the remaining particles are matter. How are these elements formed in the first place? Where is the transition point? What would be the conditions necessary for this transition? Is it possible that the actions of fusion provide heavier and heavier and larger elemental nuclei with their corresponding electrons and they cool, with the remaining…

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 5 replies
    • 1.9k views
  5. Well guys, I have been brought up with this "coincidence". And I refuse to believe it is mere coincidence. Over the past year, I have devoted to finding a logical reason rather than attributing it to God/chance. Last Sunday at 1:16:10 AM (Puerto Rico time) or 5:16:10 AM (Universal Time) ocurred Puerto Rico's biggest earthquake since 1918. Coincidently, last Sunday's date was 05/16/2010. How can we explain this??

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 6 replies
    • 1.6k views
  6. Started by Sunne,

    The magnetic machine was constructed by the inventor from Poland. You can read the article on his website: http://www.andrzejstruski.com/articles_66_The-magnetic-machine.html It is the only construction of this type in the world.

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 3 replies
    • 1.2k views
  7. Thank you very much! Atheists ROCK!!! ************************** ************************************ see, you glorious people have last names like first names, which is kinda cute! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flying_Spaghetti_Monster ************************************************************ how about I believe in WHATEVER I want - even in the FLYING SPAGHETTI MONSTER! - and you do the same! ************************************************************ let me show you the end results of this particular *SUCCESSFUL SCIENTIFIC MODE* of thinking that is called *CRITICAL THINKING*, which is completely in line with all human objectives...…

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 4 replies
    • 1.3k views
  8. Started by xatheistwarfare,

    Atheists, you are going to learn even to TALK about GOD the way you do is going to cost you your lives… ——————————————- the writing on the wall... f*ck you very much! Atheists!!! ************************** ************************************ see, you degenerates have last names like first names... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flying_Spaghetti_Monster ************************************************************ how about I believe in WHATEVER I want - even in the FLYING SPAGHETTI MONSTER! - and you have nothing to say! ************************************************************ let me show you the end results of this par…

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 1 reply
    • 1.3k views
  9. Started by Moontanman,

    If UFO reports are at least sometimes real nuts and bolts space craft from another civilization where do they come from? it would be easy to just say they are all hoaxes or misinterpretations of common objects but in many cases there is embarrassment of data by people that could under different circumstances condemn you to life in prison if not death by their testimony. So if we give credence to at least some reports where do they come from? And how could we detect them by scientific means that would indicate their reality?

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 56 replies
    • 8k views
  10. Started by Widdekind,

    Matter vs. Anti-Matter asymmetry stems from "global" Curvature (Topology) of Spacetime ? Does matter / anti-matter symmetry assume, implicitly, that spacetime is "globally" flat ?? If so, could it be, that the highly curved state, of a hyper-spherical "closed" cosmos, or hyperbolic "open" cosmos, soon after the Big Bang, would favor one form of matter over the other -- perhaps b/c matter & anti-matter "protrude" from spacetime in "opposite directions" (as per PP) ?? If so, by appealing to non-flat spacetime fabrics, as the "backdrop" for early Cosmological phenomena, perhaps the preference for matter over anti-matter amounts to convincing evidence, that th…

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 1 reply
    • 1k views
  11. Started by 1123581321,

    hi, Was wondering, in the realm of psychic phenomenon and other associated paranormal activities of the mind, How likely it is that junk DNA is really responsible producing and allowing such brain power, if it is, what could be responsible for its awakening and wether there are/have been any cases of psychics in the world having active junk DNA ? p.s. i know this may seem completely science fiction, but im really interested...

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 10 replies
    • 1.9k views
  12. Started by Charlatan,

    Some people are fat. To get thin they need to burn the fat. If they were to devour spices that are hot, they burn the fatty cells off. You need to eat spices and curry, lots of curry. If you are on a pill that makes you gain weight you could eat even more of it! Reccommend the curry though, how many fat Hindis have you seen?

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 12 replies
    • 1.7k views
  13. Started by Moontanman,

    I think can technology progress underwater has been asked before but what about advanced technology of higher than stone age or more advanced coming about in a non oxidizing atmosphere? If you can't have fire can you have anything more than stone age technology? An example would if you had a super terrestrial planet with an hydrogen atmosphere could any life advance past the stone age since fire would not be possible in a reducing atmosphere.

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 23 replies
    • 3k views
  14. Started by Charlatan,

    If we were to take a thirteen year old, we could make them stronger and more intellgent. If we were to stick them full of chemicals for this, they would, during thier peak growing times - while they are still developing into people, inject them wih stuffies to make them 'better'. ========================================================== Physical muscular growth ========================================================== We could do this by taking muscle mass and fidning what makes it the way it is, or, stimulating muscular mass by adding growth hormones to it - like steroids, but it would be legal as long as everyone does it, or, if laws are changed to make it e…

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 5 replies
    • 1.3k views
  15. Started by rrw4rusty,

    Hi, Hopefully this is the right topic for this... I've studied quantum physics and cosmology as a hobby for 20 years reading books like 'A Brief History of Time', 'The God Particle', 'The Road to Reality', etc. --in other words I don't really know snot. Never the less (and of course!) an idea has come to me that solves a lot of proglems. It kind of turns things around but it seems nice, neat and logical. Its not completely original and of course it has to be completely wrong LOL, still I wanted to post it to have it formally torn down. But it's summarized in 4 pages of bulleted items and pictures in a zipped Word document. I think I can guarantee that …

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 0 replies
    • 1.2k views
  16. so basically i gotta tangent, the ether is the source of all matter and force, "energy" does not exist in a physicl form, but its the "ability to do work" which is equal to the "force over time" the word "energy" is a convenient fiction, like "time" which is an arbitrary measurement of the rate of motion of matter though ether filled space. all events occur in the present and the past and future are meerely metaphors. the eether is a universla medium which fills all space and appears to be dynamic relative to the earths moving thousands of miles per hour though space the ether is normally electrically neutral and penetrates all solid matter. there is a ultra high frequenc…

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 3 replies
    • 1.1k views
  17. Started by lucky45,

    Did mankind come to be from the evolution of some ameba or some single celled organisim that came together at the beginning of our planet? Or were we put here by some super intelligence from another planet? And just maybe these aliens are keeping watch over us! Who can say, Maybe all of the UFO reportings might have some truth to them.

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 24 replies
    • 3.7k views
  18. Started by Widdekind,

    The curvature of mass-free space-time is allot like the "compensating curvatures" (my words) of a soap film, drawn out between two circular hoops, held up in the air (Wheeler. Gravitation & Spacetime). Now, for a soap film to exist in space, the soapy water must be different from the medium in which it is immersed — to wit, whilst one could create soap films in the air or in a vacuum, one could not do so "under (soapy-)water". Arguing naively from the analogy, then, the "film" of space-time must be distinctly different from the "medium" of Hyperspace. Moreover, the shapes of soap films are created by the counter-balancing of Surface Tension forces t…

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 2 replies
    • 1.3k views
  19. Started by Phx Lord,

    My theory has just had a few holes poked through it. I would like evryone who cares jot down thier theories and supporting argument on this thread. I can then review these theories to refine my own.

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 15 replies
    • 2.9k views
  20. Started by ecoli,

    This is probably why non-physicists shouldn't waste their time thinking about physics: So by determinism, I'm talking about the concept that if you knew the state of every particle at the beginning of the big bang, you could recreate or model the universe perfectly as well as make perfect predictions about the future. I think the concept is rooted in chaos theory. The Many worlds interpretation is, I think, considered correct by a consensus of physicists. My question is, if you knew all the causes and effects starting from initial conditions, how could the wave function collapse on an alternative to our own universe? Determinists claim that randomness is …

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 5 replies
    • 1.6k views
  21. Started by xshen,

    Attached are the pdf and words format. Because the short article contains equation that can't paste here. Hope interesting people join discuss or e-mail me. my e-mail address is xl_shen@yahoo.com Why the Special Relativity is wrong.pdf Why the Special Relativity is wrong.doc

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 19 replies
    • 4.3k views
  22. The lever paradox and the elevator paradox are more challenges to relativity than the twin paradox and the submarine paradox. The lever paradox was raised by Xinwei Huang about in 2001. It has be discussed for many years in China. The conclusion is that special relativity can not explain the lever paradox, unless the introduction of the gravitation magnetic field hypothesis. So Xinwei Huang raised the elevator paradox about in 2004. The elevator paradox has almost no discussion because even the gravitation magnetic field hypothesis can not explain it. To solve these two paradoxes, I put forward my own theory. It can also explain the phenomenons that be explain…

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 6 replies
    • 2.8k views
  23. Can the Principle of Constant Light Speed be Proved by the Michelson-Morley Experiment? Please read http://api.ning.com/files/Hark62hE1uMt2uQHmYnIptCnoMSBmVwR4Gsc1ONqXXZnJOalLs3GDgRoF6fc35dYyOu1ooXfqn0SxtL*iXC4F9NTsZXu-ADT/Apaper.pdf This paper has just been accepted by GALILEAN ELECTRODYNAMICS. Dr. Cynthia K. Whitney, an editor in GED, said to me “It is understandable, and reasonable to publish in GED. Please be aware that GED pages are filled through year 2011,So this will appear in 2012, unless someone withdraws something before then.” This paper was contributed to the American Physical Society(APS), and reviewed by the editors and reviewers of PRL, PRD and …

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 91 replies
    • 12.3k views
  24. Started by vuquta,

    Hi, I seem to have a condition in which SR measure two different values for c. Since the math is somewhat long, I've put it to a pdf file here. If you find any logic or SR errors, please feel free to point them out. Thanks in advance.

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 103 replies
    • 10.6k views
  25. Started by padren,

    Just out of curiosity, could the manner in which we experience time, the patterns of entropy and all that good stuff be a side effect of the big bang's outward impact through space/time in which, with our perceptions being limited to this small sphere of space/time effectively appear "linear" due to how small that range is? To elaborate, lets say the big bang occurs and space/time and all matter and goodness goes flying out in every direction, in space and time. We exist at a location a certain distance from that center in both space and time. If we could "do a 180" with regards to time and head towards the center of the big bang in space, entropy would appear to go…

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 0 replies
    • 997 views

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.