Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
bored_teen

1+1= not 2?

Recommended Posts

That wouldn't really fit with any regularly used definition of '+' then would it?

 

Roman Numerals I+I=II

 

:P

 

That wouldn't really fit with any regularly used definition of '+' then would it?

 

Roman Numerals I+I=II

 

:P

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sorry... :confused:

 

Isn't the fact that 1+1 = 2 derived empirically?

 

 

As in " When I put one nut in the sack and then another nut, then I got two nuts in the sack."

 

And logic is then a generalized system based on the above and similar empirically derived non-disputable facts?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

[math]suc0 + suc0 = sucsuc0[/math]

 

proof:

 

principia.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, I've seen stuff like that too! There is just one trick, dividing by zero.

 

Just out numbers instead of variables and you will see that it actually doesn't work!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You'd possibly better mail it to him, because:

Bored_teen is a decent person

bored_teen bored_teen is offline

Last Activity: 08-01-2007 08:52 AM

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You'd possibly better mail it to him, because:

 

hehe i'm back. i got it. thanks everybody!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was going to say, when the first 1 = one apple and the other 1 = one orange then you have 1+1 = Fruit Salad!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

oh hey you guys i heard this forum was the place to be so i decided to join... to the point 1+1 obviously = 2 what are you on about /sigh thanks bye

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
oh hey you guys i heard this forum was the place to be so i decided to join... to the point 1+1 obviously = 2 what are you on about /sigh thanks bye
Joining with two accounts is against the rules. I doubt your sincerity and you have a big strike against you, especially since your other account has already started calling people "idiots".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So, a quick summary of when [imath]1+1\neq 2[/imath].

  • When your working modulo <2
  • When by '+' you don't mean 'plus'
    • As the logical operator AND, which I've always seen written as '^' which seems an awful lot less confusing. But write it however you like, whatever. (you'll note that I never challenged this)
    • When you chose it to mean something completely random, which is okay, just boring.

    [*]When by '1' and '2' you don't mean '1' and '2'. This is stupid. (a 'I' doesn't look like a '1', srsly)[*]When you apply a fallacious 'proof', this is mega stupid.[*]When you are otherwise being stupid, or boring.

Unless I've missed something, can we call this concluded?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1+1 = 10

 

There are 10 kinds of people: those that can read binary codes and those that can't!;):D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Unless I've missed something, can we call this concluded?

 

Yes please. This thread should have been closed a looong time ago.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.