That wouldn't really fit with any regularly used definition of '+' then would it?

 

Roman Numerals I+I=II

 

 

That wouldn't really fit with any regularly used definition of '+' then would it?

 

Roman Numerals I+I=II

 

hmmm

 

1 + 1 = 0 mod 1

 

or

 

1 + 1 = 0 mod 2.

 

There. There's two cases.

no there is a way where you start if assuming that A=B or somrthing, ill find out tommorow.

I'm sorry...

 

Isn't the fact that 1+1 = 2 derived empirically?

 

 

As in " When I put one nut in the sack and then another nut, then I got two nuts in the sack."

 

And logic is then a generalized system based on the above and similar empirically derived non-disputable facts?

[math]suc0 + suc0 = sucsuc0[/math]

 

proof:

 

if it is vector addition the value could be anywhere between 0 and 2.

1+1 =2

 

this is true if 1=1

Yeah, I've seen stuff like that too! There is just one trick, dividing by zero.

 

Just out numbers instead of variables and you will see that it actually doesn't work!

Goodness people.

 

Here you are bored_teen:

http://mathforum.org/library/drmath/view/57110.html

http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Fallacy.html

You'd possibly better mail it to him, because:

Bored_teen is a decent person

bored_teen bored_teen is offline

Last Activity: 08-01-2007 08:52 AM

You'd possibly better mail it to him, because:

You'd possibly better mail it to him, because:

 

hehe i'm back. i got it. thanks everybody!

1+1=10

I was going to say, when the first 1 = one apple and the other 1 = one orange then you have 1+1 = Fruit Salad!

oh hey you guys i heard this forum was the place to be so i decided to join... to the point 1+1 obviously = 2 what are you on about /sigh thanks bye

oh hey you guys i heard this forum was the place to be so i decided to join... to the point 1+1 obviously = 2 what are you on about /sigh thanks bye

Joining with two accounts is against the rules. I doubt your sincerity and you have a big strike against you, especially since your other account has already started calling people "idiots".

1+1=10

 

Obviously, 1 + 1 = 11.

So, a quick summary of when [imath]1+1\neq 2[/imath].

• When your working modulo <2
• When by '+' you don't mean 'plus'
  • As the logical operator AND, which I've always seen written as '^' which seems an awful lot less confusing. But write it however you like, whatever. (you'll note that I never challenged this)
  • When you chose it to mean something completely random, which is okay, just boring.

  [*]When by '1' and '2' you don't mean '1' and '2'. This is stupid. (a 'I' doesn't look like a '1', srsly)[*]When you apply a fallacious 'proof', this is mega stupid.[*]When you are otherwise being stupid, or boring.

Unless I've missed something, can we call this concluded?

1+1 = 10

 

There are 10 kinds of people: those that can read binary codes and those that can't!

Unless I've missed something, can we call this concluded?

 

Yes please. This thread should have been closed a looong time ago.