dimreepr

The problem is, not all of us are contributing to life, whatever the hours we work. You may as well ask, how does a token of food fill our bellies, better than food? If all the billionaire's, spent their money on feeding people, rather than filling their ego's; some of us may live another day...

Imagine that, it has peanuts in it...

Lunchtime. doubly so...

It's been discussed many time's, I once asked Swansont why the heat death of the universe wouldn't result in a universal BEC; if I remember correctly, density was, at least, part of the answer.

Most people fear, what they've been taught to fear; the shocking part is, it's incredibly easy to teach; all you need is a trusted adult. And no means to question them...

Context, is kinda the definition of here... sorry, if here is out of context...

Most of us, aren't here... Language is a bitch, for most of us...

Human, the last time I checked; though I may have been drunk at the time... 😉

Yet they all do it, "google v nation state's" is like asking "how do we stop ourselves?". And I've got a fucking pension, that I'm currently trying to liquidate...

I find the notion that money can self replicate/regulate, to be an abomination.

I'm not, I'm here. 😁

Why are you so keen to change what people are? As Markus suggests, being content with who we are is much less damaging than wearing a mask, to make other's content with who we are; not that that is even possible, unless they're content with who they are, and that kinda defeats the reason for a mask.

Dark language. 🤔

You just need a thesaurus, some of my sentences are just the set up to, or just jokes. I wish I was special...

Imagine that... 😁 Cybermen are allergic to gold, right?

That's the equals part, right?

I knew I should have added 😇.

Strange that, the closer we get to disaster on this planet, the more money we spend trying to get off it.

IOW, down-hill is just a direction...

Indeed, we have to start with the fundamentals, for instance what physics expert can repair/build a car? First, we have to understand the limitations of knowledge as it pertains to understanding the human condition.

A friend of mine once said "never go to the next lesson, until you've understood the last" it's the curse of knowledge that you think there's a "deeper understanding"; there is just understanding, some do and some don't; a good teacher improves the number that do and struggle's with those that don't. A good student just struggles.

For the rest of us it means, let's try to understand our fellow human's before we cast them/and us into Dante's Devine comedy.

Neither, the police are quite adept at inspiring violence at an otherwise peaceful protest. Like I said, the difference is the intent on the part of the protester's and I think there's little doubt the Trump army intended violence, when they descended on the capital, because they didn't get their way in the polls; so no, the two aren't equivalent. You can't/shouldn't just dismiss a legitimate protest because some of them defended themselves when attacked. Violence is never Ok, is more of an excuse to deny legitimacy in this context; I have every sympathy with pacifism as an ideal, but then I've never been attacked for waving a banner. The difference is, they used that motivation as an excuse to be violent, rather than a reason to protest.

But it is a discription of us... One imagines...

In answer to the topic title; the difference is intent. BLM had banner's that explained why they're protesting... And the easiest way to discredit that explination, is to provoke violence...